Two-Tier Health Care - Essay Example

Health Care Delivery Systems  Health Care Delivery Systems A health care system is also referred to as a health system orhealthcare delivery system. A healthcare system refers to the organization of resources, people, and institutions to provide health care services to meet the health requirements of targeted people. There are various health care systems all over the world, with as many organizational structures and histories as there are countries. They include publicly funded health care, two-tier health care system, single-payer system, universal health care system, and socialized medicine system. In some countries, health care system planning is disseminated among market members. In others, there is a joint attempt among trade unions, religions, governments, charities, or other corresponding units to provide designed health care services aimed at the population they assist (Saltman & Von, 1995). This paper will assess the similarities and differences between different health care delivery systems. Section 1 Publicly funded health care is financed partly or entirely by people’s tax sums instead of through exclusive fees. This are made directly to health care givers or insurance companies through deductibles, insurance premiums, or copayments. Two-tier health care is a system whereby an assured public health care system is in existence. However, a corresponding health care system functions in equivalent competition. The private health care system gives the patients a chance to hold more alternatives in selecting their physicians and waiting lesser periods. Nevertheless, two-tier health care system is expensive and set aside for only those who can meet the expenses (World Health Organization, 2000). Physicians who work in the private health care systems may also have an advantage because they can establish their own charges. Single-payer system is a method to financing health care with a single source of funds for paying health care givers. The range may be community based, national, or state-wide. The payer may be an entity like an insurance agency or a governmental unit. The proposed benefits may comprise large savings in overhead charges and administrative simplicity for providers and patients. Universal health care system is also referred to as social health protection, universal care or universal coverage. It depicts a health care system that gives free coverage and health care to everyone in the population of that state or country. Conversely, universal health care does not cover everybody for all things. Moreover, universal health care can be influenced by three vital features: what services are covered, how much is covered, and who is covered (Institute of Medicine, 2001). Socialized medicine system provides hospital and medical care for everyone in a population at a minimal fee. This is through government control of health care services and financial backing obtained from taxes. In some instances, the term socialized medicine has been employed to refer to universal health care system. In addition, socialized medicine in industrialized nations is likely to be more reasonable than in systems where there is less government inclusion. Universal health care system and socialized medicine are similar in that both of them provide affordable health care services for every person in the population. Public funded health care system and socialized medicine system also have a similar feature. Both of them are funded through funds obtained from people’s taxes (Institute of Medicine, 2001). Section 2 Public health care system has a philosophy that permits access and is illustrated in the rules that apply to the entire population that contributes finances or benefits from the system. This is what differentiates public health care system from other types of private medical systems. They have a right to use the agreed upon subjects in contractual requirements between the participants. In addition, privately funded health care systems attempt to build profits by controlling the use of finances between givers of health care services and funders. Its goal is to provide reliable health care services to members of a population through their taxes. The philosophy of two-tier health care system is to provide an assured public health care system to those who can afford. Nonetheless, it gives the patients a chance to have more alternatives in selecting their physicians. Also, the users of two-tier health care system service profit from lesser waiting periods (Saltman & Von, 1995). The key goal of single-payer system is to offer universal health care cover for members of a population. This is with lower prices and similar quality services to other health care systems. Its philosophy on funding stems from a sole source of funds for paying health care practitioners. Single-payer system aims at saving overhead charges and promoting administrative ease for providers and patients. Universal health care system’s philosophy entails providing free coverage and health care to everyone in the population of that state or country. In addition, universal health care system is planned throughout giving a precise packet of advantages to every member of a community with the final goal of giving financial risk safety. Moreover, other goals of universal health care system include developed health care results and increased access to health care services (World Health Organization, 2000). One of the goals of socialized medicine system is guaranteeing worldwide access to health care services. Its philosophies evolve around the quality of health care coverage that a sick person receives. Additionally, socialized medicine system is aimed at lowering the total charges for providing health care services in a given nation. Nations that employ public health care systems instead of government-sponsored health care systems have a tendency of spending a large percentage of money on health care provision. In socialized medicine system, the funds utilized for administration is kept within acceptable levels, thus maintaining the cost of health care service provision within adequate standards (Institute of Medicine, 2001). Also, its goal includes providing hospital and medical care for all at a minimal fee through government control of health care services and financial backing obtained from taxes. All the health care systems share a similar goal of providing efficient health care services to patients. Section 3 My mission statement is to provide a patient-centered, reliable, and safe care through efficient and innovative care delivery techniques. This mission statement means that the health care system will be open to the expectations of the members of a population, and there will be fair monetary input. I chose this mission statement because it illustrates that the most effective care is delivered by using efficient and innovative care delivery techniques. Conclusion Health care systems are composite, and alterations do not assume epidemiological forms. The key objectives for health care systems are sensitivity to the anticipation of members of a population, adequate health, and reasonable financial involvement. Additional programs should be adopted at both country wide and worldwide levels so as to intensify country wide health care systems as the key feature of the world wide health care system (World Health Organization, 2000).. With this capacity in mind, it is paramount to have an unrestricted and clear idea of country wide health care systems that may cause additional advancement in worldwide health care.   References Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academy Press. Saltman, R. B., & Von, O. C. (1995). Implementing planned markets in health care: Balancing social and economic responsibility. Illinois: Open University Press. World Health Organization. (2000). World health report 2000 - health systems: Improving performance. New York: WHO Press. Read More