Considering Cases when Active Euthanasia Can Be Acceptable - Research Paper Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
The paper "Considering Cases when Active Euthanasia Can Be Acceptable" states that many people argue that active euthanasia, taking specific steps to cause the patient's death, is wrong because it is contradictory of the Hippocratic oath for a doctor to take the life of a patient…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.6% of users find it useful
Considering Cases when Active Euthanasia Can Be Acceptable
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Considering Cases when Active Euthanasia Can Be Acceptable"

Argument Essay
Pro Euthanasia
A medical treatment called active euthanasia which means to actively do something that will end a patient’s life with or without that individual’s consent. Euthanasia in an involuntary manner is usually only done because the patient is comatose or unconscious, or unable to communicate whether or not they want to have their life prolonged through artificial means. In these cases, the physician makes the decision to end the patient’s life because that individual would experience only pain and suffering in their present state. Active euthanasia should be allowed in order to give people the right to die with dignity, without pain and in peace.
Another way that active euthanasia can be viewed as acceptable is taking into consideration the immense amounts of suffering that goes along with terminal illness. When life becomes a burden and it is of no further use to the patient, doctors are required by law to take no action and wait until the illness takes over the person’s body. Professor Pence reminds us that, “the suffering of terminal patients is not confined to physical plain, as bad as that is: it involves helplessness, stress, exhaustion, terror, loss and other experiences that are difficult to imagine” (Pence). In most cases powerful narcotics are the only alternative for relief, but they usually reduce the patient to a vegetative state in which they have no further use of their life. In addition, the Hippocratic Oath states that the doctor has the duty to practice and prescribe for the benefit of the sick according to their best ability and judgment, as well as keep the patients from harm and injustice (“Hippocratic Oath”). So in the case of excessive pain and suffering where patients ask for final relief, passive euthanasia goes against the ethical practice of medicine that the doctors have to uphold. Also, it is proven that the physical pain isn’t even the usual reason for patients to ask for physician assisted suicide, but the anguish that comes along with the slow process of dying (Pence). The cases of terminal illness prove that passive euthanasia is morally worse than active, because the doctors have the tools to help their patients but they choose not use them or they are legally bound not to, therefore, the act of relieving the person of their misery is seen as morally correct.
When euthanasia, of any form, is necessary in a certain situation, the patient’s death seems to be no worse than the patient’s continued existence. If the patient is better off dead than alive, the cause of death seems to be irrelevant if the doctors have the same intentions of liberation. In contrast to the belief of actively taking someone’s life is ethically wrong; in some instances taking the tormented person’s life without pain can be seen as better than allowing them to suffer for longer periods of time. As a result, since both forms of euthanasia result in the death of a suffering patient, no one form should be viewed as morally superior than the other.
Many people argue that active euthanasia, taking specific steps to cause the patient's death, is wrong because it is contradictory of the Hippocratic oath for a doctor to take the life of a patient, and no one person should legally have the power to end the life of another. However, what about Janie’s case? These doctors have the power to end the suffering of a dying infant without any pain or prolonged misery, and yet they are not permitted to do so because it is seen as murder. Is there nothing wrong with standing by and watching an emaciated child die slowly as dehydration and infection take control of her body? Is terminating her pain worse than watching her die when they have the power to 4 suffer for longer periods of time. As a result, since both forms of euthanasia result in the death of a suffering patient, no one form should be viewed as morally superior than the other.
It is important for the families of the patients and the medical experts to work together and do what is best for the patient. The main focus should be on what the patient would want, if it is medically and financially feasible and most of all the “quality of life” the patient would have. I believe the following paragraph sums this issue up in the best way.
The Catholic Health Association noted that:
Just having medical technology around creates a mind-set that technologies
which can be developed ought to be developed; and, if we have them, we
ought to use them. Available technology becomes part of standard
treatment, even if its use on a particular patient may create more burdens
than benefits. For example, some physicians find it difficult not to use dialysis
machines, ventilators, or feeding tubes even when they only prolong dying.
Similarly, some patients and families find it hard to refuse them, since
technology represents the best standard of care…In a society captivated by
science and its awesome results and efficiency, we can easily lose sight of
the overall purpose to be served by technology. Medical technology is to be
used in service of the total good of the patient. The temptation to be
dominated by technological equipment stands in opposition to the unrecognized
wisdom that not everything that can be done ought to be done.95
Until we are truly put in this position with a loved one of our own, we will never really
know what we will feel or want for the patient. Each person feels and loves differently for
the people in their lives. Ultimately making this kind of decision is best based on
Compassion for the patient and the family.
Works Cited
“Active and Passive Euthanasia.” New England Journal of Medicine 292 2 (1975): 79-80. Print.
“Arguments against Euthanasia.” Pregnant Pause. Pregnant Pause, 2001. Web. 1 Nov. 2009.
“Euthanasia Pros and Cons.” Pregnant Pause. Pregnant Pause, 2001. Web. 1 Nov. 2009.
“Hippocratic Oath.” Wikipedia. N.p., 31 Oct. 2009. Web. 2 Nov. 2009. .
“The Hippocratic Oath: Modern Version.” NOVA. WGBH Educational Foundation, 2009. Web. 2 Nov. 2009. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Considering Cases when Active Euthanasia Can Be Acceptable Research Paper”, n.d.)
Considering Cases when Active Euthanasia Can Be Acceptable Research Paper. Retrieved from
(Considering Cases When Active Euthanasia Can Be Acceptable Research Paper)
Considering Cases When Active Euthanasia Can Be Acceptable Research Paper.
“Considering Cases When Active Euthanasia Can Be Acceptable Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
jordimarks added comment 1 year ago
Student rated this paper as
At first, I thought 3 of pages is too much for such a subject. But now I see it could not be done smarter. As the author starts you see the difficulty of the topic. I’ve read all at once. Precise paper

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Considering Cases when Active Euthanasia Can Be Acceptable

Voluntary Active Euthanasia

...safely exist a social duty to end the pain of a person who expressly declares a wish to end their life, and that this duty can override the fears and apprehensions of society as a whole (Hooker, 2002, p. 26). Very little evidence exists to provide foundations for the argument that legalization of VAE would gradually be interpreted as a positive duty to end the life of suffering individuals in all cases; its very restriction to ‘voluntariness’ would overcome such fears. Some argue that the value of human life cannot be overridden by any conflicting theory, thus rendering VAE morally incorrect because the sanctity of life should never be actively legislated against (Keown, 1997, pp....
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Moral dilemma of whether euthanasia is ethically acceptable

.... This is a kind of passive euthanasia, one can argue, given that old Eskimos are basically left to their own devices, in harsh conditions, and without the ability to further take care of themselves. This is acceptable in Eskimo society, and impliedly deemed as ethical and moral, even as the west may shun this as being harsh and unethical, and against common decency standards even. Banning euthanasia, even when the elderly patients want it, and even in the face of great suffering and pain on the part of the elderly dying and their families, can be construed as being immoral and unethical on the part of the Eskimos, meanwhile. These latter...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay


...), several attempts have been made since then to overturn the law but the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the law following arguments presented by the Gonzales v. Oregon case. Oregon State was followed by Texas in 1999 when it passed the Texas Futile Care Law where hospitals and physicians within the state can withdraw life support or treatment on a terminally ill patient (Kerridge, Lowe and Stewart, 2009). Passive Euthanasia and Active Euthanasia Advocates of euthanasia argue that passive euthanasia is morally worse than active euthanasia. From a utilitarian point of...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Active and passive euthanasia

...are a fusion of biological processes and biographical experiences; this is true to some extent of all illnesses, but is especially true of chronic illnesses. Following Rachel: "active euthanasia is condemned not merely as illegal but as 'contrary to that for which the medical profession stands' whereas passive euthanasia is approved" (p. 248). The treatment of chrnic illnesses in particular requires a fusion of biolgical understanding. In this case, "Letting someone die" is certainly different, in some respects, from other types of action- mainly in that it is a kind of action that one may perform by way of not performing certain other actions" (p. 248). In spite of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Considering Cases Of Bankruptcy And Reorganisation Of A Partnership

...Running head: CONSIDERING CASES OF BANKRUPTCY AND REORGANISATION OF A PARTNERSHIP Personal Legal Perspectives UNIT 5 IP Personal Legal Perspectives UNIT 5 IP Question One Explaining whether the petition for involuntary bankruptcy should be granted Beren, Elliot and Mannino formed a general partnership with an aim of purchasing and renovating an office building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. They had borrowed more than $200,000 from a bank for purchasing and renovating the building. These expenses exceeded they estimates in that disagreement arose among the partners on whether they should seek additional funds. Beren was for seeking additional funds while Elliot and Mannino were opposed to this issue....
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Active and Passive Euthanasia

...murdering his six-year old cousin in the bathtub and letting him drown by doing nothing. I find that argument ridiculous because both examples are morally wrong—they are both murder, and the guy should be prosecuted in both situations. It is a very different situation than a doctor or family member allowing someone to die or participating in active euthanasia. I also find the Down’s syndrome examples unsatisfying. Rachels wrote his essay in the 1970s, and medical treatments for babies born with Down’s has greatly improved since then. My problem with Rachels’ arguments is that it is obvious that he does not believe in the sanctity of life. If he did, he might have felt differently about giving...
1 Pages(250 words)Literature review


...Outline and Bibliography Outline This paper examines the phenomenon of euthanasia, presenting some working definitions of the practice in modern medicine. It takes the point of view that euthanasia is not an acceptable ethical or moral choice, from most particularly the Christian viewpoint presented. This perspective is taken based on Biblical instruction against the acts of both murder and suicide. To present an overview of the arguments against euthanasia, three major world religions’ stances are examined: Christianity, Islam and Judaism. Christianity forms the basis of the argument throughout the discussion; Islam and Judaism are presented in support of this ethical...
11 Pages(2750 words)Research Paper


...My Stand of Euthanasia School My Stand of Euthanasia Euthanasia is the process of intentionally ending a patient’s life in order to alleviate pain and suffering and allows the individual to be comfortable at the end stages of life. There are different forms of euthanasia, including voluntary, non-voluntary, involuntary, active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is the process of ending the patient’s life to end pain and suffering but such a decision is made by the patient. Involuntary euthanasia involves performing euthanasia on a patient, who is able to provide informed consent, but in such circumstance consent for euthanasia is not being asked or the patient may not want to die, though they may not oppose... ...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay


...& Somerville, 2014, p. 8). On the other hand, the law safeguards physicians against the cruel act when euthanasia is legalized. This has well been suggested by Marker (2006, p. 59) when the researcher observes that legalization of euthanasia creates an atmosphere whereby a criminal act proves to be acceptable or an appalling act turns to be an appealing one. This legal immunity may prompt certain physicians to engage in intentionally fatal prescriptions. In spite of the various social, ethical and religious concerns over the legalization of euthanasia, one can find increasing societal acceptance of...
8 Pages(2000 words)Admission/Application Essay

Active and Passive Euthanasia by James Rachels

...Active and Passive Euthanasia al Affiliation) Question One Active euthanasia is preferable to passive euthanasia in some instances like when a patient is suffering and is pain since from a moral stand point, by actively euthanizing a patient (through injections), you are easing their suffering and pain. In addition, the intention for actively euthanizing the person is not death itself but to ease the person’s suffering and pain. Death is merely unavoidable. Question Two According to Rachels, the conventional moral doctrine, which permits passive euthanasia but disallows active euthanasia, can facilitate people to base life and death decisions on moral grounds that are irrelevant. This is because the doctrine exclusively asserts... . In this...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Considering Cases when Active Euthanasia Can Be Acceptable for FREE!

Contact Us