Sex and Gender: Women Rights and Sexual Revolution - Assignment Example

Relationships according to England and Thomas readings Q1). Are Hook-ups good or bad for women’s rights according to England and Thomas? In the past years, dating had become the norm for many campus-going students. However, in the start of the year 200, a student amazed the professors when he wanted to carry out a research as to why dating is not as much common as it was in the past. Further examinations by the professors proved that this observation was real. They asked in class and got a response that brought more questions than answers. The students mentioned that they would rather hook up or hang up with their friends rather than date. Further research relieved that this was a national wide trend (England and Thomas 141-142). Traditional dating was when a man asked a woman out several days prior to the day they were supposed to go dating if she was interested. The innovations made dating more casual that it was before. However, the question that bugs many people is; are hookups good or bad for women’s rights? According to England and Thomas, hook ups are when two people go out dancing, for movies and later on retire to a more private place for sexual encounters. Such encounters are aided with a lot of drinking (143). From the research that was carried out, more men enjoyed hookups than women did. The rates of satisfaction in women were low and many were not happy with their en counters. Many of the men hooked up with women that they had never seen before and in the morning, they could not remember their partners (144) Taking to perspective the fragile nature of the women emotions, it is then appropriate to say that hook ups are not in the best interests of the women. Many of the women leave the encounters emotionally bruised and the fact that they have not achieved the intended felling’s makes it more frustrating for women (147). Q2). Is cohabitation an alternative to marriage according to the article? Why/why not As much as there is dating, hooking up or any other form of interaction people need to live together. This is what is called cohabitation; a living arrangement that is facilitated by agreement between two parties. Mostly this happens in members of the opposite sex. According to Casper and Bianch, the increase in heterosexual cohabitation has led to delayed marriages and an increase in divorce and caused one of the most significant changes in family life, as we have known it (153). It is believed that cohabitation had decreased the committed that is associated with marriage. Marriage used to be the foundation of sexual relations, living together among many other family related matters (153). Today people are joining up to live together without even being married. They are having children and even giving themselves names husbands and wives without thinking of getting married first. This attributes a lot to the rates of separations and bad choices that are associated with premature relationships (154). The increasing acceptance of cohabiting is breaking the link that was established by marriage. This is changing the difference that was there between the married and the single. In both relationships, there are more similarities than differences. The society upholds a legal marriage more than a cohabitee because of the moral upholds that is associated with the institution (155). In the research that professors carried out, they found that cohabitation is an alternative to marriage in this modern world, but has different benefits and respect than cohabitation. Q3). What is the good marriage, bad marriage phenomenon according to Skolnick? Research has shown that marriage is an institution that has been in our society for the longest time. Recently an article that was published brought out the bad state in which our society is in concerning marriage. The article read that a 40-year-old woman has better chances of being killed by a terrorist than setting married (Skolnic 192). The combination of both high rates of marriages and divorce seem paradoxical but they represent the same side of the story (193). Couples in marriages these days are expecting a lot than the case was earlier. In the culture we are living in divorce has lost its meaning and shame and staying in marriage has become like being marriage. The good marriage bad marriage phenomenon describes marriage as a convenience of satisfaction (195). A lot of those who were sampled showed similarities in the way that both the married and unmarried partners perceived satisfaction in married. In addition, the difference was seen when one partner was contented with the marriage that he or she is in and the other partner is not. Most partners complained a lot, about how the other partner did not do this or that making them being in the marriage just for convenience (195). The good marriage bad marriage phenomenon is expressed across all couples irrespective of their age or social background. The main factor that brought about the good marriage bad marriage phenomena was anger over lack of satisfaction in marriages (196). In the research that was carried out it was evident that some of the people interviewed were angry over their partner’s habits. Q4) .What are the two magazines that were instrumental in the sexual revolution? How did they make a difference? In 1948, two controversial magazines revolutionized the sexual word. Both magazines titled ‘sexual behavior in the human males and sexual behaviors in the human females were written by Kinsey and sold over half a million copies (Bailey126). However, the magazines were seen as controversial they opened a lot the sexual world of both men and women. The fact that when the two magazines were being published there was no much publicity over sexual issues between men and women made the magazines more fame. The magazines highlighted the most common struggles that both sexes endure during marriage. The magazines had a lot of exposure to matters that were considered private between a man and his wife. The writer brought all these issues to the limelight starting his very own sexual revolution. The magazines were based on two hypotheses overt and covert (126) He described these two angles to his stories in sexual context. The magazines brought a revelation as to how people were doing what they were not supposed to do. The research that was done by the writer showed that many people had engaged in premarital sex and they approved it on moral grounds this statement threw the perception about premarital sex into a new direction. Many people that it was okay to have premarital sex basing their arguments on morals. The magazines gave light to the three strands that are associated with sexual revolution. This gave the leaders a new look on issues related to cohabitation marriage ad sexual behaviors. Works Cited Bailey, Beth. Sexual Revolution. Sex and Gender. 1st ed. 126. Print. Casper, Lynee and Suzanne, Bianchi. Courtship and Marriage. Sex and Gender. 1st ed. 141- 147. Print. England and Thomas. The Decline of Dates and Increase in Collage Hook Ups. Sex And Gender. England and Thomas. 1st ed. 2002. 141-143. Print. Skolnick, Arlene. Grounds For Marriage: How Relationship Succeed Or Fail. Sex and Gender. 1st ed. 192-196. Print. Read More