Homosexuals Should Be Entitled to Marry - Essay Example

I disagree with Andrew Sullivan’s premise that homosexuals should be entitled to marry. Firstly, all the major religions in this world completely shun homosexuality and consider it to be a heinous sin. The religious laws shall not lose their importance and sanctity with time and should be respected by all, by accepting homosexuality we’d be indeed interfering in the ways of nature and disrupting the cycle of production and reproduction that Nature has set aside for our benefit.

Secondly, marriage is a very pure and sacred institution. I believe that promoting the rights of homosexuals and legalizing marriage for them is an insult to the sacred and traditional institution that marriage is. Our society gives us no right to play with the traditional values that have been set by our ancestors. Homosexual marriages will give rise to non-serious marriages. As mentioned by Andrew Sullivan, gay men enjoy more sexual freedom and escape the strains of monogamy. Legalizing gay marriages would hence mean inculcating more promiscuousness and corruption into your society. Gay men are more likely to have many partners than straight men and they are less likely to be loyal to only one partner for a long time. Hence, the traditional family ties would be further weakened which would in turn have a detrimental impact on future generations.

People might also want to marry stuffed toys, their mothers or brothers or sisters, so how would they be stopped from claiming their rights?

To be frank, Homosexuality is still considered an abnormality or a psychological disorder amongst many conservative societies and they would be completely unacceptable towards the stance of legalizing same-sex marriage. Also, it has been shown by numerous studies that gays are more likely to have a shorter life expectancy. Promiscuousness, drinking, smoking, and unhealthy lifestyles should be avoided.

I disagree with Andrew Sullivan’s claim that same-sex marriage would strengthen the culture of marriage. Heterosexual marriages are considered sacred because they are the reason behind the continuation of generations of a particular race. Promoting same-sex marriages would mean promoting a channel that would lead toward the end of your race, ethnicity, and creed. And therefore, in my eyes, it would be a highly ridiculous thing to do.

As mentioned in the article, I truly support the words of Stanley Kurtz. I believe that men should be paired with women and both should complement and support each other. Both of them are created to be with each other by nature and they should tame and pamper each other for the future generations to be more socially and morally strong.

To conclude, same-sex marriages are not natural. One should not support something unnatural just because one gets pleasure from it.