Spatial Imaginary on Racism - Essay Example

Task “Ethic” Race and spatial imaginary are inseparable. Spatial imaginary on racism involves presumed discriminative racial identity in shaping up opportunities and life chances for individuals and groups. This essay intends to examine the dynamics of appreciating race and racism work by accounting for the vibrant ways in which racial identities are spatialized in tandem with a racialized space. An ordinary perception on race gives a shallow definition of racism basing it on the physical happenings and treatment. However, this study establishes that, racial segregation goes beyond unfair discrimination since; associations between races imply associations between places (George, 21). For instance, space can create racism through residential and school isolation, discriminative policies on taxation and transport, bigotry mortgage and cover redlining and biased relocation of environmental facilities and noxious hazards. The relationship between race and space is real because human beings do not exist in a vacuum. Human beings exist in space so do racism. The white identity in the US is place and space bound. It exists due to segregation of neighborhoods and schools. This practice distort down the opportunities along racial prejudice. The practices represent space racism and spatial race, consequently learning and legitimization of whiteness is perceived as natural and unavoidable. The whites enjoy access to privileged opportunities for social enclosure and vertical mobility (George, 28). This trend imposes discriminative and unjust forms of mistreatment and segregation on less advantaged communities based on color. Racialized space defines all facets of urban life. This study evidences that, the dynamics of understanding race and racism are directly correlated to the racialized space and spatialized race (Caroline and Pedersen, 186). The racial thoughts, which consign people from diverse races and backgrounds to diverse spaces creates unequal access to employment opportunities, education, transportation service and shelter. Conversely this space exposes the less advantages races to environmental vulnerability and other numerous social nuisances. On the other hand, the whites, who are more advantaged benefit from accessing superior social facilities, economic chances and fundamental individual connections (George, 32). This occurs on the understanding that, lived experience occurs in actual spaces while the lived experience of place is determinately and logically defined from both explicit and clandestine knowledge of race. However, this study reveals that the purported benefits attributed to the whites from the spatial links, damages the long term interests. On the other hand, the marginalized races such as Africans create ways of imagining and continuing a more decent and dignified social associations for each one (Caroline and Pedersen, 189). The racialized space imagination that often used by the whites to prejudice other races especially the Africans should be lowly regarded because diverse races inhabit different places by chance and not by choice (George, 54). For instance, when considering the outcomes of race and racism on housing and lending, and other injustices, makes places synonymous with races. The American whiteness is one of the most steadily subsidized identities in the globe, ensuing from the racial implication of places. This identity enables the whites to acquire and own homes, which adds value and create wealthy that is passed down to other successive generations. On the other hand, the racially discriminated group confronts a falsely constricted housing market, which compels them to live in rented houses forever due to inaccessibility to home owner’s tax code subsidies. Conversely, the segregation based on schools purposes to direct the children from less advantaged races into poorly equipped schools with inexperienced tutors (George, 62). On the other hand, the children of the whites enjoy well verse education system in well equipped schools with experienced teachers. Moreover, racialized space and spatialized race can be evidenced by a situation where racially discriminated groups of people are forced to live in a segregated inner neighborhood. Taxes are imposed based on color on through the health care system. The racial wealth gap is related to this racial health gap. This study indicates that proper understanding of race and racism in relation to racialized space and spatialized race is a key component of examining the real situation in a racist milieu (Caroline and Pedersen, 192). The racial discrimination on health, housing has widened the life expectancy gap between the richer and principally whites living the suburbs and the poorer and primarily Africans living down town. Similarly, this study establishes that prejudice on housing influences both health and wealth. Relegation of people from diverse races to dissimilar places potentially skews contact with noxious hazards such as incinerators, wastes, scrap meals, pollutants running from freeways and industries, and this haphazardly threatens the health conditions of the discriminated and relegated groups of people. On the same regard, previous research indicates the notion of discrimination itself is a threat to normal health. The prejudiced experiences hamper the normal functioning of the bodily mechanisms such as endocrine, metabolism and immunological systems. This condition is attributed to hypertension (Charles 51). This implies that imagining of being racially discriminated is equally impactful as space and spatial prejudice. These aspects of racism results to exaggerated costs of health care among the segregated group of people. Equally, the spatial prejudice on employment chances and social facilities increases the transportation costs. This study establishes that, racialized space goes principally unobserved because it is a product of long history induced so impressively in the imperialist’s art work (Caroline and Pedersen, 188). It is notable that, racial subordination and exploitation is closely linked to spatial control, dispossessions and exclusion. The superior race spatial imaginary can be countered by the formation of race based social groups that make the inferior race’s existence and color meaningful. The issue of insurance cover’s bigotry and discriminatory mortgage lenders as skewed down the life chances of the minority races to insure their lives and property and own homes respectively. The lenders subject the minority races to exorbitant interest rates on mortgage loans. In addition, the lenders subject the racially discriminated individuals to extra credit checks thus making it difficult to acquire and own homes (Charles, 41). On the other hand, the white counterparts who are favored by the space and race free prejudice face less preventive conditions. They are able to receive free counsel on resourceful investments options (George, 24). They secure loans easily with lower interest rates. Nevertheless, the black or prejudiced spatial imaginary perceive space as precious and predetermined as a public responsibility for all inclusive stewardship. It can be argued that, discrimination brought about by the white spatial imagination and racialized space can be countered by willful involvement of the minority races in diverse sectors of economy such as administrators in financial institutions, can increase lending to the minority (Charles, 47). Moreover, the numerous manifestations of racial disparities in various sectors of economy and aspects of life can be addressed by allowing the racially marginalized enjoy political, economic and social freedoms. Nonetheless, spatial imagination of the prejudiced race can reflect a mind set of having strong democratic institutions to serve all mankind indiscriminately. The white spatial fantasy depicts the suitably gendered flourishing suburban homes as the fortunate moral topography of the nation, while the demonized people of color are depicted by incarceration, regulation and unfit for freedom (Caroline and Pedersen, 189).This mindset has immense political cost, which emerges from public guidelines that subject the materialistic consumer at the axis of the social globe, which acts a pillar for aggressive privatization and cynical localism as superior race in the suburban. This encourages the superior race to crew together with the intent of capturing facilities and benefiting themselves in various ways, while outsourcing the accountability and troubles to inferior races. However, the minority spatial imaginary continually grows hostile with enormous generation of new and apt democratic imaginations and ambitions intended for justice and equality. The ideology that emerged from the spatial realities immensely accounts for the radicalism that Dr. King and the civil rights groups championed for. Dr. King proclaimed that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (Caroline and Pedersen, 192). Dr. King desired that all minority races come up together with a mind of incorporating themselves in an inescapable network of mutuality destined at equality, fairness and morality among all God’s people (George, 24). Notably, the prejudiced spatial imaginary emerging from multifaceted couplings of race and space promote solidarity amongst the minority across the spaces. This imaginary remain irreducible to personified identity. In conclusion, as the white spatial imaginary advances racial discrimination attributed to consigning people from diverse races and backgrounds to diverse spaces creates unequal access to employment opportunities, education, transportation service and shelter (George, 21). Conversely this space exposes the less advantaged races to environmental vulnerability and other numerous social nuisances. On the other hand, the prejudiced spatial imaginary emerging from multifaceted couplings of race and space promote solidarity, forego personal interests over public interests, believe in environmental protection, affordable housing to all, public education to all children, efficient transportation and universal medical care (Caroline and Pedersen, 185) Work cited Elkins, Caroline, and Susan Pedersen. Racial violence and origins of Segregation in South Africa” New York: Routledge, 2005. Lipsitz, George. How Racism Takes Place. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2011. Print. Mills, Charles W. The Racial Contract. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997. Print. Read More