Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/gender-sexual-studies/1407376-family-support
https://studentshare.org/gender-sexual-studies/1407376-family-support.
How would you define family support?
In the course of human history, family dynamics may have evolved. In the past, the traditional family included a father, a mother, children, and extended family members. Nowadays, families come in different forms with different values upheld. There are now single-parent families, adoptive families, affinitive families who do not share any blood relations, same-sex parent families, etc. Still, the common thread that binds families of old with families today is the love and support shared by the members.
Family support is a philosophy that promotes the growth and development of families. It aims to enhance the strengths innate in families as well as strengthen identified weaknesses in order for the members to achieve optimal well-being and personal success. Various family support programs have been developed and offered in communities, however, Malcolmson (2002) believes that family support should have a strong commitment to relationship-building based on trust, respect, and sharing of power.
Dunst (1995) offers the following characteristics of family support programs:
How does the theoretical framework of family support e.g.: premises/paradigms and guiding principles culminate in a promotion model of service delivery to families as described in the reading?
The theoretical framework of family support gives the prevailing idea that support services are more preventive than promotional. Initially, being preventive is viewed as a good thing. The cliché “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” hails prevention as the ultimate paradigm to keep families safe, healthy, and far from the risks of deterioration. However, Dunst, Trivette, and Thompson (1990, as cited in Dunst, 1995) and Cowen (1994, as cited in Dunst, 1995) contend that the use of prevention models goes against the principles of family support. They argue that the prevention of problems does not guarantee that families will effectively function and their competence will be optimized, as opposed to situations when they are given opportunities that support and strengthen families from the onset.
Family support is characterized by a proactive paradigm that focuses on further enhancing families’ strength with promotion-oriented practices. Such practices have a mastery and optimization orientation, and the development, enhancement, and elaboration of an individual’s skills and strengths are emphasized, most especially the competencies that increase his control over the important aspects of his life (Dunst, 1995).
Hence, a promotion model of family support builds strengths instead of rectifying deficits. This way, the individuals benefitting from the promotional family support find it easier to deal with life’s challenges and difficulties while they set growth-oriented goals and the achievement of personal aspirations.
What do you see as the role of the practitioner in this model of service to families?
Consistent with Dunst’s (1995) characteristics of family support services, the practitioner has multiple roles in the delivery of such service. Being alert to the needs and strengths of the families in the community, he has a broad picture of the resources and supports available. He is able to match service providers with service consumers and he bridges a sense of responsibility and collaboration between them. This is to ensure that members of the community are aptly tasked to cooperate with and look after each other. The family support services a practitioner runs or works for need to be careful in dealing with families from different cultural backgrounds. The practitioner must be knowledgeable about diversity and how to protect the cultural values of families from pressures to conform to societal standards or expectations if these run against their favor. The practitioner also encourages the strengthening of each family member’s competencies toward a fully functioning family unit. He is also concerned with urging families to adopt proactive program practices and to be more active in community involvement. This way, the practitioner contributes his share in nation-building as well as inspires others to do the same.
Read More