Case study analysis - Essay Example

Case Study Analysis Group dynamics as well as team building are primarily based on some form of fundamental relationships that do exist among the people, men and women, involved and is normally both a courteous and logical thing to keep assuring members of such groups, introduce them to each other and give them opportunities to learn their members and engage in building strong relationships that are beneficial to the organization. As has been established in other researches, people usually tend to give much of themselves in cases where they know and understand each other better as opposed to when they do not.

Gender matters do play an important role in group dynamics and should thus be addressed with the care they deserve (Nazzaro & Strazzabosco, 2011). As has been seen, many groups do form for two main reasons which are either based on purely social needs or to achieve a certain goal at hand. When a group is on the move to solve an issue that is when the interactions grow stronger, especially in cases where the group has been constraint with time and resources meant to achieve the results (Klochan, 2002).

One such group under this analysis is the Anne Barreta case which has a lot of responsibilities and in this case, the gender issues coupled with affirmative action does make things lively in spite of the fact that there is a lot of work involved. It has been argued that instructors are in a better position to make use of this case in reinforcing the fact that things in any organization or work are never straight forward nor simple as it might appear on the onset. It is called upon the group to explore various options or give possible explanations for the goings on instead of relying on one explanation.

It could be argued that people act in a manner that at times goes beyond their gender orientations. The needs of workers in an organization may vary and there is thus a reason to handle them carefully. The results that came from these observations are applied to other areas that are composed of men and women and the behaviors were almost similar. Having both genders in a group brings about synergy which might be missing in a group that is composed of only one gender. The other benefit is an equal opportunity to all whereby there is no discrimination that is based on gender.

Focus also changes from one person to the other and blame becomes a group thing rather than an individual’s because and thus this pushes the group towards finding a better solution to the problem. The behavior of women and men in this group seems to be that which compliments each other rather than isolation. There arise different strengths that each member of the group brings to the group based on their gender. Women having been known to be more emotional than men are likely to calm down heated debates and help find solutions.

This could be seen as a motherly approach to a situation that is going overboard. The male gender on the other hand comes in with the need to take responsibility. Men have been seen to be more likely to own responsibility for the mess caused. This brings in the aspect of the group not working in denial of the real situation and helps find solution to the problems at hand rather than blaming it on one person. The challenges within a group dynamics come with the fact that people have different backgrounds and could not be on the same level of needs much as the situation demands that they work together in groups.

People tend to have different perception, goals and reasons for working. For instance, in a group whereby the member is at the level of self-actualization as opposed to those who are at the self-esteem achievement would have different needs. The challenge is thus bringing together the individual interests to help shape the success of the group as a whole. This is why pursuing individual interest might ruin the success of a group if not well handled since the individual needs always tend to conflict with the group needs and thus it is better to find the fine line that could bring about balance.

The participants in a group setting like this need to put aside their individual interests and work towards the need of the group so as to find success at work. Both men and women need to collaborate away from the fact that they are of different genders. Much as this is sometimes difficult to achieve, they could complement each other by breaking down the work at hand so that it suits both genders and thus achieve synergy. There are various ways in which I would work to strengthen my effectiveness in a mixed-sex work situation.

One of the main actions would be to share all the information available to all members equal despite their gender orientation. This is because information is important and thus if not well handled brings about asymmetry in the group. Thus effective communication within a group is most important to help remove any form of tension. The other second action would be to build consensus on major decisions that are being undertaken within the group and in this case I would urge both genders to participate equally.

I would also encourage full participation by taking turns to speak when we are in a group gathering or meeting. Finally, I would be urging the group members to keep themselves focused on the goal of the group and work towards achieving it rather than basing work on gender issues (Cohen, et al., 2007). References Cohen A, Granot-Shilovsky L, & Yishai Y (2007), The relationship between personal, role, and organizational variables and promotion to managerial position in the Israeli education system. Pers. Rev., 36(1): 6-22.

Klochan FK (2002). The organizational and human dimensions of successful mentoring across diverse settings, United States of America: IAP. Nazzaro Ann-Marie & Strazzabosco Joyce (2011), Group Dynamics and Team Building