Download file to see previous pages...
The acquisition between the two firms created a lot of opportunities for the competitors in the market to gain stability and thus pose even stronger competition in the market. Besides, the acquisition led to an increase in the shares [prices of the company as opposed to the reduction in its value as it was anticipated. Moreover, the acquisition was as a result of ACM struggling to pursue its selfish interest in the construction industry to ensure that it controls the whole market. It is evident that the primary aim of the acquisition was to eliminate other competitors from the market in order to create a free market for ACM Construction Company to dominate the market. This however did not succeed due to the poor strategies involved in the acquisition. To begin with, the Income statement of the company before the acquisition is better than after the acquisition. The company used to make a lot of profits in the past as observed by Depamphilis (2011).
Since the acquisition between the two companies took place, Jacobs Construction Company has remained steady and continued to enjoy more customer base than before. There has been a significant increase in the number of share of JCE traded with a stable price of $ 23.8 and an average of 240 shares being traded daily. The income statement also signifies a decrease in diluted average weighted share from 132.18 to 126.47 by the r March 2015. This is a good indicator that the company had gained economies of scale and thus financial growth due to the competitiveness created by the acquisition of the two firms according to Bruner, (2004).
The operational synergy for JCE converged and moved together in the same direction after the acquisition of AECOM. This also signifies an improvement in functionality and management of JCE as compared to the merged firm. Moreover, it means increased competition among the firms in the industry as opposed to the primary intention
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
It has been seen that the value created is high for the target firms present in advanced institutional and economic environments. The advanced economies refer to the countries that possess resources of high quality. Aulakh et al (2000) have shown the modus operandi of the domestic firms that take part in the international resources acquisition.
Since the past decade, the globalisation of the businesses across the globe has initiated a search for the competitive advantage, worldwide. With the increased competition to fetch the customer satisfaction in a cost effective way, the companies have responded to the pressure of attaining scale in a quickly consolidating global economy
Introduction In the last 5 decades there are more stances of cross border mergers and acquisitions than the number of lockouts and cases of bankruptcy. Although the number of cross border merger and acquisitions has increased manifold but the instances the number of cross border mergers and acquisitions has increased substantially.
The degree of concentration is on rise due to the horizontal mergers. Considering an example of Staples Inc., a retailer of office supplies acquired Office Depot i.e. giant retailer of office supplies as well. It was believed that the merger will reduce the number of superstore competitors, as Staples will be the only product available in the market.
Most companies carry it out to improve their business fortunes.
The terms mergers & acquisitions are generally used together or sometimes even interchangeably but there is a sight difference in the two terms. Acquisition takes place when one company becomes the owner of another company in a way that the company sold ceases to exist and the buyer company continues to trade its stock.
The acquisition of related targets creates economic value, but the value is captured by the owners of target firms while the owners of bidding firms break even or, as studies showed, at the least M&A does not decrease the shareholder value of bidding firms.
In a merger, the surviving firm acquires the assets and liabilities of the other firm(s). A relevant example here is the recent merger of HDFC Bank and Times Bank. After the merger, Times Bank will go out of existence and expanded HDFC Bank will continue to exist.
The current P/E ratio of the shares is 6.6 and the market price per share is 1.03. Since P/E ratio = market price per share/earnings per share (www.12manage.com), if the P/E ratio is to be 8 without affecting the earnings from the share, the value of the
lly starts through a series of informal discussions among the board members of the companies, following with formal negotiations, letter regarding the objectives, goal towards the company, acquisition or merger agreement and finally, executing the deal and transferring the
Companies may also merge in order to overcome forces of competition by increasing economies of scale. Many companies have merged due to diverse reasons depending on their situations and market scenarios. This paper will discuss the merger that took place between the US airways
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Mergers and Acquisitions (AECOM) for FREE!