Legalization of Same-Sex marriage - Research Paper Example

For example, marriage enables spouses to receive insurance through their partners’ employers. They are also allowed many other rights such as the ability to make decisions for their partner who is being hospitalized, have the right to sue on their partner’s behalf and cannot be forced to testify against them in court. Married couples also pay less in taxes and receive many other social and financial benefits. But because gay couples are legally prevented from marrying, they are excluded from receiving the same considerations that married heterosexual couples enjoy.

This paper will more closely examine the benefits denied gay couples as well as the political and legal implications involved with the issue. It will conclude with a discussion involving one of the main non-religious based reasoning’s that those who oppose of gay marriage espouse, the affect of this type of living arrangement on the children of the relationship. Five states plus the District of Columbia allow same sex marriage and California’s status in currently in the court system. Gay marriage in California will not be allowed to precede until federal and state appeals courts made a decision regarding proposition 8.

Gay-rights supporters had petitioned the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and asked it to end the hold put on a San Francisco federal judge's decision last year, that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional and California authorities should stop enforcing it. Other countries such and the UK, Norway, Denmark, and Canada all give full-fledged marital rights to any couple. Seven states and numerous countries allow civil unions. Allowing gay couples to marry works well in several states and countries.

Intolerance is the only reason it is not legal in the U.S. Advocates of non-traditional marriage argue that there is no constitutional basis for denying legal matrimony to gay couples. The Constitution not only legitimizes gay marriage but implies that the government should never have considered a ban and should instead actively pursue legalizing gay marriage. As citizens of the United States, all people are guaranteed the inalienable right to pursue happiness. It does not exclude on the basis of sexual preference.

The government was originally formed as an entity meant to champion the rights of the individual whether they are on the majority or minority side of public opinion. Laws that were enacted in the South disallowed the marriage between black and white people but were struck down by the Supreme Court. In 1964, the Civil Rights Act followed the tenets of the Constitution by prohibiting this type of discrimination. The opposition to gay marriage is based on prejudice and, as time passes, the concept will become more and more accepted.

It, like racial prejudice, will become socially abhorrent (Sullivan, 2000). In addition, the disallowing of gay marriage by legislation violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.  According to the American Civil Liberties Union, “The law [against same-sex marriage] discriminates on the basis of sex because it makes one's ability to marry depend on one's gender.” The ACLU continues by saying, “Classifications which discriminate on the basis of gender must be substantially related to some important government purpose.

Tradition by itself is not an important government purpose” (American Civil Liberties Union, 1998, pp. 14-15). In 1997, the General Accounting Office reported that heterosexual married couples enjoyed