Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Supreme Court Justices (Government 2) - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
SCALIA AND THOMAS The Supreme Court of the United States is one of the most revered of American institutions. The justices who sit on it have some of the finest legal minds in the country and are sworn to uphold the Constitution, the founding document of the nation…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.2% of users find it useful
Supreme Court Justices (Government 2)
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Supreme Court Justices (Government 2)"

Download file to see previous pages Both men are on the conservative wing of the court and have held their position there for many years. Both are remarkably intelligent men who have also been lightning rods for political controversy. Antonin Scalia is a Reagan appointee and has sat on the Court since 1986 and is the senior associate judge. He still has many years of service left. He is known for his sarcastic wit and sharp tongue, as well as for his hard-headedness. He is known for his dissenting opinions. A dissenting opinion disagrees with the majority opinion and is issued separately, often attacking the reasoning of the judges who sided with the majority. As one critic observes: His writing style is best described as equal parts anger, confidence, and pageantry. Scalia has a taste for garish analogies and offbeat allusions—often very funny ones—and he speaks in no uncertain terms. He is highly accessible and tries not to get bogged down in abstruse legal jargon. But most of all, Scalia's opinions read like they're about to catch fire for pure outrage. He does not, in short, write like a happy man (Clarke). Nevertheless, Scalia knows what he believes. In the end, he is not interested in the government forcing people to act in certain ways. Although he is a pro-life Catholic, in 1992 in a case about funding for Planned Parenthood, Scalia has this to say about the legality of abortion: “The States may, if they wish, permit abortion on demand, but the Constitution does not require them to do so. The permissibility of abortion, and the limitations upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting.” Another famous ruling by Scalia came in Grutter v. Bollinger in 2003. This was a case about affirmative action. The court ruled that the University of Michigan should permit affirmative action in order to create a more diverse, harmonious school. Scalia, in a dissent, said he found this ridiculous. These were ideals that the government should not legislate but are taught by general practice. Respect for others was something that “is a lesson of life rather than law—essentially the same lesson taught to (or rather learned by, for it cannot be 'taught' in the usual sense) people three feet shorter and twenty years younger than the full-grown adults at the University of Michigan Law School, in institutions ranging from Boy Scout troops to public-school kindergartens.” Both of these cases show that Scalia is a man of principle. He is not willing to sell his ideals down the river. He understands that even thought the constitution may be a document written many years ago, a living tree is just as likely to rot as it is to grow. Clarence Thomas was appointed by President George H.W. Bush. He has many years of service ahead of him. He is originally from a poor family in Georgia. He is only the second African-American to sit on the Supreme Court, after Thurgood Marshall. He is known for his quiet and serious demeanour on the bench. The issue of his appointment was one of the most scrutinized and divisive issues in politics in America in the 1990s. During his confirmation hearings in the Senate, a woman named Anita Hill came forward to say she has been sexually harassed by Thomas. Thomas denied this. Thomas' response to the allegations was truly memorable. Faced with a huge circus around unproven allegations, he told the Senate, “This is not an opportunity to talk about difficult matters privately or in a closed ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Supreme Court Justices (Government 2) Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Supreme Court Justices (Government 2) Research Paper)
“Supreme Court Justices (Government 2) Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Supreme Court Justices (Government 2)

Important Models of Justices' Behaviour at the Supreme Court considerations on other external actors of the account. In conclusion, strategic model of behaviour has the greatest utility than either legal or attitudinal models of behaviour of judges and justices of the Supreme Court. Work cited 08-956 Wood v. Allen (01/20/10 and related cases that involved strategic models of behaviour, 2010 Epstein, L, and Jack K. The Choices Justices Make. Washington: CQ Press,1998. Hall, M. G. and Paul,B. "Toward an Integrated Model of Judicial Voting Behaviour." American Politics Quarterly 20(2).1992 Langer, L. "State Supreme Courts and Counterma-joritarian Behaviour: Strategic or Sincere?"...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Selection of US Supreme Court Justices

...Selection of US Supreme Court Justices - Procedures and Politics Introduction The selection and of Supreme Court Justices is embodied inthe Article 2 and 3 of the US Constitution as mere phrases: "The President. shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senateshall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law." ("U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 2") and...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...The Apocalypse of Adolescence By Yuliya Having read through the article en d "The Apocalypse of Adolescence", several conclusions came to mind. First, juveniles should almost never be given the death penalty, as this provides virtually zero learning in relation to moral guidance and the receipt of understanding as to what is right versus what is wrong. The death penalty takes their young lives and forever changes them, without the opportunity to be rehabilitated by competent sociological or psychological professionals. However, when the case is similar to the one in the article, the juvenile death penalty may be imposed, especially when the children show no regret for their actions. The problem, however, appears to lie in whether...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme court justices- controversial case

...Supreme Court Justices-Controversial Case Since the time of the constitution, the notion of separation of church and has been not only an issue of much debate but also an issue challenged in multiple ways within supreme court rulings. According to the separation of church and state, the government has no jurisdiction over religious ceremonies or practices which are church affiliated. This applies to the arena of marriage as in most cases, it is under some type of religious authority that marriages take place. Additionally, the government should not be able to dictate who may or may not be married depending on gender...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Court Justices

...Judicial Campaign Question Based on data presented in the tables, what is the difference between individual and al contributions? Which candidate raised the most money from individuals and from institutions? Answer: The individuals are the persons from public who does not belong to any business or law firm that is not having any direct personal interest. On the contrary, the institutions constitute PAC and businesses having direct interest in the selection of a particular judge. In this regard, Justice Jefferson raised 49% share of money from the individuals and 51% share of money from the institutions. Question 2: Use the tables in the assignment to compare the differences of courtroom funds as a...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper

Supreme Court

...Supreme Court Opinions The principle responsibility of the U.S. Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution. It has thefinal say in settling legal arguments and determining the meaning of laws thereby setting national policy. The Justices write majority and minority opinions following a decision. These fall into four categories, unanimous, divided, very divided and per curium. Unanimous decisions are written when all nine members of the court vote the same way. The Chief Justice (John Roberts) assigns any Justice the task of writing it or may choose himself. Sometimes, if the case has many nuances...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...Supreme Court Data of Supreme Court In the United s, the court is considered to be the highest tribunal in the land that is expected to exercise justice to all the citizens. It acts on, and provides fair arbitration to all the controversies and cases that arise under the constitution or the law. It being the final arbiter, the Supreme Court is entrusted with the ability to provide equal justice through the use and interpretation of the law, hence, it also functions and a guardian in interpretation of the constitution (Charles, 2012). It is because of these very important functions that the Supreme Court is expected to carry out constitutional review in order to equalize the constitution with the major changes that have taken place... in the...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Supreme Court

...Supreme Court Supervisor June 27, Supreme Court The argument for an originalist perspective to interpretation of the constitution is rational because of the advantages that the theory offers to the contemporary and dynamic environment. The fact that no written constitution, or any other law, can anticipate and provide for all possibilities is one of the justifications for a non-originalist perspective. Laws, such as the constitutional amendments, were developed to remedy immediate and anticipated problems and transition through the amendments’ existence have realized developments, some of which are beyond expectations of the developers of the amendments. Relying on the letter of the amendments would therefore be retrogressive... and be a...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Supreme Court

...and Fifth Amendment which were being violated. Decision of the court The decision of the court which was delivered by Justice Black and which had a 6-3 decision was the affirmation of the conviction order for Korematsu where it sided with the government about its national security and prevention of espionage. Reasoning in the case The reasoning of the court was not based on the constitutionality of the presidential executive order, the racial segregation or even the loyalty of the petitioner to the United States. It rather looked at the bigger picture which in this case was the safety of the citizens of the United States from espionage and further...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Supreme Court

... DD Month YYYY ESSAY POLITICAL SCIENCE Introduction The American government is divided into various armswhich perform different functions. The arms include the judiciary, legislature and the executive. Every branch of the government has distinctive functions which they perform independent of the other branches. To achieve this each has their specific roles which they perform as led by their leaders. All branches are guided by the American constitution which details out the rule and regulations governing the Americans. This paper explores the functions of the supreme court, its roles as well as Federalism and its effects to America (R. Dye, Zeigler and Schubert). SUPREME COURT The supreme court carries out various functions... which...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Supreme Court Justices (Government 2) for FREE!

Contact Us