LAW & ETHICS IN PRACTICE, and Case study(Paramedics area assessments) - Research Paper Example

The patient may not realize the potential seriousness of the wound, the potential danger to himself or others, and may be delirious for various possible reasons. Under the A person of or over 18 years of age may, while of sound mind, give a direction under this section about the medical treatment that the person wants, or does not want, if he or she is at some future time…incapable of making decisions about medical treatment when the question of administering the treatment arises” (“Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995,” 1995, pp. 6). Jack’s problem is not simply that he was drinking—the other issue was that he could possibly have other medical problems such as the hemmhoraging or a stroke, given the fact that he had certain symptoms.

Under the Ambulance Services Act of 1992, “A licence…will be subject to those provisions of this Act prescribed by the regulations, with any necessary or prescribed modifications” (“Health Care Act 2008,” 2008, pp. 40). 4. The doctor has legal, ethical, and moral obligations to follow up with his patient in an active role or capacity. He could have his license revoked without proper follow-up or if he mistakenly prescribed medication for which he did not follow up with the patient. It is not safe to assume that the cause of Jack’s problems are completely due to alcohol; rather, alcohol worsened the situation.

Jack was already possibly having a medical problem(s) when he drank alcohol. A possible stroke could’ve happened due to the slurred speech and dizziness. The clinicians should follow up just in case anything else is happening with Jack. A legal request may be made for a breathalyzer test since this did cause a domestic disturbance. Jack may be fined for any subsequent damages caused. “In Australia [there is no equivalent of] the First Amendment…,” therefore Jack cannot just say or do whatever he wants and call it free speech like it might be posited in the United States (Fatehi, 2007, pp. 102). He must be held liable for what he has said and done. 17.Yes, it is evidence of depression with a suicidal tendency.

Jack would probably qualify as a level 1 case. In such a case, “A patient to whom a level 1 detention and treatment order applies may be given treatment for his or her mental illness or any other illness of a kind authorised by a medical practitioner who has examined the patient” (“Mental Health Act,” 2009, pp. 20). This is enough to render Jack under the care and control of the first responders. Yes, evidence of depression would allow us to take Jack into our care and control, and by law, we now have enough evidence to put Jack under our care and control.

Showing that he has the inability to make rational decisions is part of the rationale of this decision. 20.Delaying a decision on this case puts other, more serious clear-cut cases at risk. Therefore, a decision must be made quickly. If the clinicians cannot decide what to do, the decision should be relegated to a higher authority. The police may be utilised to escort Jack to the ambulance. It has happened in several circumstances before where mental patients have been escorted to ambulances by the police. 28. If a guardianship order was issued, the powers that would then give the paramedic would be to take care and control,