RUNNING HEAD: RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION INSTEAD OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SCREENING Response to Intervention instead of Special Education Screening A Research Paper Name University Professor Course Date Contents I. Introduction a. Description of RTI b. Purpose of RTI c…
Download file to see previous pages...
Lack of Consistent Measurement/Standards b. Lack of Training on Measurement Tools Associated with RTI c. Difficulty in Using RTI across Large Numbers d. Local vs. National Standards IV. Current Variations of RTI Use a. RTI to Replace Regular SPED Screening b. RTI in Conjunction with SPED screening c. No RTI V. Recommendations for Future Methodology a. More Standardized Criteria for RTI Results b. RTI Use for Entire Population c. Continue SPED Screening d. Implement a Shared Approach Using both Tools/Systems Response to Intervention instead of Special Education Screening I. Introduction Description of RTI Response to Intervention, commonly referred to RTI in the education discipline is a form of academic intervention and a multilayered approach that provides services to students by specifically providing the type of education that suit their level of academic need through the corresponding level of instruction. It is a new model in education used in the United States which specifically functions as a special education identification method (Harlacher, Nelson Walker & Sanford, 2010, p.30). RTI is composed of different levels of instructional supports within which the students are assigned on the basis of the results gathered from screening and progress monitoring data. There are variations to the structure of RTI model but the most common example is the three-tiered model. Tier 1 is composed of scientifically based curriculum with differentiation in terms of instructions to be able to prevent possible learning difficulties
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Response to Intervention instead of Special Education Screening Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/family-consumer-science/1418603-response-to-intervention-instead-of-special
(Response to Intervention Instead of Special Education Screening Research Paper)
“Response to Intervention Instead of Special Education Screening Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/family-consumer-science/1418603-response-to-intervention-instead-of-special.
This paper looks into the health-education related problem that I have come across with in my own community. With regard to that, the paper looks into the various aspects of the deficiency, identifying the extent of the problem, as well as providing innovative interventions to it. The paper also reviews the theoretical approaches and models of health promotion and how they can be used in the intervention process.
The general fact is that children who do not show response to effective interventions are more likely to have biologically explained learning disability hence needs a special education process. The introduction of this program was in order for it to replace the ability-achieved discrepancy model that required students to exhibit their ability in academic achievement usually measured through grading and standardized testing.
From this definition, it is clear that education is a very wide field with various areas of focus. This essay purposes to concentrate on special education as an area of education, which caters for learners with exceptionalities. Every child deserves to be educated on how to live a self-determining and fulfilling life, despite having physical, mental, or any other disabilities.
The approach gained credibility in the last decade as alternative to the criteria used traditionally in teaching students with special needs. The most critical elements of the RTI approach are that it facilitates the adoption of intervention and instruction program in education that is based on research and scientific facts.
In this article, Garry Freeman (2012) tackles two major issues with regard to special education. The first issue that he tackles is the belief and the accusation that schools in UK are overstating the number of special education students in their school in order to get more funding from the government.
Each of these forms has their own specific differences, as well as, the features upon which each can be evaluated so as to suit the organizational needs of Ms Seow. In this paper, I seek to discuss in brief these forms and then select on one upon which I shall make a recommendation about and the justifications for the same.
Lack of health insurance serves as a major barrier to cancer screening compliance. Second major factor affecting compliance is awareness or misconceptions about screening programs. Education is an important tool to improve awareness which
The purpose of this paper is to present a traditional review of literature on PBS interventions for children with autism with a specific focus toward classroom special education teachers. The paper will conclude with identification of the most critical educational implications for classroom special education teachers regarding PBS intervention for children with autism.
The argument suffices if the people to whom the education or schooling program is intended to have special needs or in a euphemized situation and state are “enabled differently.” Thus, in order for the students or people with special needs or
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Response to Intervention instead of Special Education Screening for FREE!