We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Operation Iraqi Freedom - Research Paper Example

Comments (0)
Operation Iraqi Freedom Instructor name Date The expression “the first casualty of war is the truth” would probably be appropriately applied to all of the wars between nations throughout the entire history of warfare. The Iraq war, however, will always be branded as the only war that was based completely on lies…
Download full paper
Operation Iraqi Freedom
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Operation Iraqi Freedom

Download file to see previous pages... Iraq had no link to terrorism, no weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and no legal rationale to attack. Despite this, Bush decided to invade the Republic of Iraq for causes deemed objectionable to the majority of other countries so he frequently relied on and utilized false information to rationalize it. He lied. This discussion will examine how the truth was a casualty early and often during the lead up to the war and outlines some of the consequences brought about by these far-reaching and deadly deceptions. Bush voiced his disagreement to the concept of ‘nation building’ during the 2000 presidential election debates but as president waged an undeclared war against a sovereign country that had neither attacked first nor threatened to. Immediately following and as a reactionary reply to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, Bush stated the county’s intention to begin a ‘War on Terrorism’ which he portrayed as a protracted battle against those that would use terrorist actions in addition to the countries that enabled them. The eventual culmination of the selective legal reasoning and rhetoric concerning the ‘War on Terror’ was Bush’s order of the military to invade both Afghanistan and Iraq, an illegal action on many fronts. Bush had constantly claimed that these actions were legal. First, he argued, due to language existing within the UN Security Council Resolution 1441 regarding Iraq and secondly, the invasions were an act of self-defense which is permitted by international law. Conversely, according to Richard Perle, advisor to U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and official of the U.S. Defense Policy Board, “international law ... would have required us to leave Saddam Hussein alone.” (Burkeman & Borger, 2003). However, this option would have been “morally unacceptable” according to the Bush administration. The United Nations Charter, Article 51, Chapter Seven stipulates “nothing shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self defense if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations” (United Nations Charter, 1945). Article 51 allows a country the justification to “deter an act, or acts of imminent or ongoing violence” but only as a transitory solution until the UN Security Council takes the appropriate actions to ensure the protection of the affected region. By precise interpretation of this Article, the rights of self-defense a country can exercise does not comprise the right to retaliate after an attack has ceased. The U.S. defended its invasion and occupation of Iraq to the countries of the world by announce, if not substantiating, that it was a undertaking to remove WMD which endangered not only the U.S. but all other countries as well. Secretary of State Colin Powell as well as other administration officials, predominantly with the U.S. Department of State, enthusiastically endeavored to state their justification for aggressive military actions and make this plan as acceptable to as many other nations as they could. Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary of Defense at that time, is quoted in a Vanity Fair magazine interview dated May 28, 2003 as saying “For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction” (Shovelan, 2003). Before to the invasion, Hans Blix, the man in charge of the UN weapons inspection team in Iraq, said unequivocally and very publicly ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Operation Iraqi Freedom
Though obviously an overstatement, this observation has also some general correlations in the history of American wars. From the great war of independence, to the war being waged against Iraq, the US has shown some common elements of war policy and strategy through history.
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
Red Ball Express
Delving into the era of Alexander the Great, despite tremendous problems, gigantic armed forces were able to cross military ground fields and areas of war. Armed forces were ahead, whereas their large groups of wagons that were driven by animals and carriages lagged a long distance behind the troops.
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
The lost parents' perspective on Parental Alienation Syndrome
PAS involves one parent (in most cases the custodial parent), distancing or estranging the child “or children” from the other parent by means of various conscious and subconscious means including indoctrination. This is usually done in an effort to malign the other parent (Vassiliou & Cartwright, 2001).
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
Signal Role in Mission Command
Nationalist interests in every country and the growing pressure for national armies to take a full charge of their own security are increasingly making forward deployment of troop unnecessary (Tyler, 2008). The change to a force-projection troops demand that new rules of engagement and equipment be developed.
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
DepressionPTSD in the Military
Unfortunately, many of them exhibit life-long patterns of bad choices and self-destructive behaviors after their return. PTSD significantly compromises the quality of life of war veterans. Substance abuse, destructive behavior, depression, feeling of guilt, and other characteristics are manifestation of PTSD.
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Operation Iraqi Freedom
The Failure section highlights the failure in planning by the US that led to failure of rebuilding the Iraqi infrastructure. The counterpoint section gives some of the achievements of this campaign and downplays the notion it was all a failure. Generally, the paper investigates if indeed lack of planning could have resulted in the failure of Operation Iraqi Freedom from 2002 to 2005.
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Proposal
Oef oif
These are US Patriots who had dedicated their time to serve on active duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. Since they are Title 38 of the US Code (U.S.C.), Section 1710(e) (1) (D) guarantee them a free medical care,
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
The Iraq war
The Iraq war of 2002 began a year after the United States was attacked by terrorist in September 2001. The United States president George Bush junior, felt that the United States was vulnerable after the 11th September attacks, with the fact that Iraq leader Hussein was in possession of WMDs and as matter of fact produced them in Iraq. Bush argued that Saddam Hussein`s administration supported terrorist groups.
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
Operation Desert Storm
The purpose of the war was due to Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. The war was the first major foreign crisis for America since the cold war. The essay will focus on why US Army was unprepared for the war, the root factors that affect US
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
Defensive versus Offensive Realism
Ferguson described that Frederick the Great is a better ruler than Machiavellian leaders because the former supports preventive war that can better ensure the former’s powerful status in international political systems, while the latter will lose in an anarchic international political system by only waging wars as defense strategies.
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Operation Iraqi Freedom for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us