StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Decision to Drop the Bomb - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
Running Head: Hiroshima and Nagasaki Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Name) (University) (Course) (Tutor) (Date) Introduction The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have over the years been subject to analysis and comment of whether it was justified or not. Most scholars in the field have grappled with difficult questions of why the United States decided to use the atomic bomb when the Second World War was about to end…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Decision to Drop the Bomb
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Decision to Drop the Bomb"

Running Head: Hiroshima and Nagasaki Hiroshima and Nagasaki Introduction The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have over the years been subject to analysis and comment of whether it was justified or not. Most scholars in the field have grappled with difficult questions of why the United States decided to use the atomic bomb when the Second World War was about to end. Most of the Americans accepted the decision because of one basic reasoning that the atomic bombings brought the war to a timely end.

However over the later years many begun to question the conventional wisdom that Truman was saving lives (Oh 2000). This paper supports the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing and will give detailed reasons for this. Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is more concerned on the ethical, legal and military controversies surrounding the United States. The bombings caused the Japanese surrender, preventing massive casualties on both sides in the planned invasion of Japan whereby Kyushu was to be invaded in October 1945 and Honshu five months later (Oh 2000). The U.S side had anticipated losing many soldiers in the planned invasion of Japan even though the number of expected fatalities and wounded is subject to some debate.

After the U.S war president Truman stated that he was advised that U.S casualties could range from 250,000 to one million men. A joint study done by the Joint Chiefs of Staff in April 1945, the figures developed were 7.45 casualties per 1000 man-days and 1.78 fatalities per 1000 man-days. Thus the planned campaign to conquer Japan would cause 1.6 million U.S. casualties, including 380,000 dead (Nathalie Ettzevoglou-Hoyer, Hammond and Mueller 2000). In addition to this fact, millions of Japanese military and civilian casualties were expected as a result of such action1.

According to an Air Force Association history of the 21st century, millions of old men, boys and girls had been trained to resist by such means as attacking with bamboo spears, strapping explosives to their bodies and throwing themselves under advancing tasks. The Japanese cabinet also approved a measure to extend the draft to include men from ages fifteen to sixteen and women from seventeen to forty-five. There was an order given by the Japanese War ministry on 1 August 1944, ordering for the disposal and execution of allied prisoners of which was numbering to over 100,000 if an invasion of the Japanese mainland had taken place (Nathalie Ettzevoglou-Hoyer, Hammond and Mueller 2000).

To have waited for the Japanese to surrender would have cost a lot of lives. In each of the ninety seven months between July and August 1945 around 100,000 and 200,000 persons perished in China with the vast majority being noncombat. Famine in Vietnam caused a lot of deaths in Asia especially in 1945. According to Newman, each month that the war continued would have produced the deaths up to 250,000 people. Fire bombing that were taking place in Tokyo had killed over 100,000 people in Japan since the beginning of the war either directly or indirectly (Nathalie Ettzevoglou-Hoyer, Hammond and Mueller 2000).

Nuclear physicist Karl T. Compton in his defensive article said that if the atomic bomb had not been used, there would have been more deaths and destruction in enormous scale. Japanese government promulgated a National Mobilization Law and waged total war. They ordered many civilians to work in factories and militaries offices and to fight against any invading force. Hiroshima was mostly used as the headquarters of the Fifth Division and the 2nd General Army. It was a communication center, an assembly area for troops; it had military factories and was also used as a storage point2.

Nagasaki on the other hand was very much important because of its industrial activity which included the production of ordinance, ships, military equipment and other war materials (Oh 2000). Fumio Kyuma the defense minister of Japan stated that bombing caused great tragedy but he does not resent the U.S. because it prevented the Soviet Union from entering the war with Japan. Truman on his way to Potsdam stated that he had re-examined the decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan. In his speech he made it clear that the ordering of the bombings was to bring about a timely resolution of the war by inflicting destruction, and instilling fear of further destruction which was to make Japan to surrender.

The emperor in his speech to the Japanese said that if they could have continued to fight, the result could have been the collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation (Oh 2000). The Japanese warrior traditions were a major factor in the resistance to surrender by the Japanese military. Each soldier had been trained to fight to death and was to die before suffering dishonor. Those who surrendered were not deemed worthy of regard or respect. Even though some members of the civilian leadership advocated for diplomatic channels to attempt peace negotiation, they were not to negotiate surrender or ceasefire.

There was a political stalemate between the military and civilian leaders of Japan. The military leadership wanted to continue with the fight despite all costs and odds while the civilian leadership was seeking for a way to negotiate an end to war3. In 1945 the cabinet was also split between those advocated an end to the war on one condition which was the preservation of the Kokutai. Conclusion Arguing from these facts it is clear that the Japanese war would have caused massive destructions as opposed to the atomic bombing.

Being that government of Japan was not ready to call for cease fire, it was justifiable for the U.S to intervene. Therefore the critics of the United States intervention are not sincere of their critics as they are unable to provide a clear solution which could have been used to stop the war. References Nathalie Ettzevoglou-Hoyer, Nathalie Ettzevoglou, Hunter Hammond, and Tracey Mueller. "The Decision to Drop the Bomb." 2000. http://chalk.richmond.edu/education/projects/webquests/wwii/ (accessed April 15, 2011). Oh, Jung. "Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Decision to ." 2000. http://www.umich.edu/~historyj/pages_folder/articles/Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki.

pdf (accessed April 15, 2011).

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Decision to Drop the Bomb Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/family-consumer-science/1416916-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-the-decision-to-drop-the
(Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Decision to Drop the Bomb Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/family-consumer-science/1416916-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-the-decision-to-drop-the.
“Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Decision to Drop the Bomb Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/family-consumer-science/1416916-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-the-decision-to-drop-the.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Decision to Drop the Bomb

Ethical Dlemma Invovling the Bombing of Hiroshima

Winnacker (26) states that Professor Albert Einstein remarked leading physicists in the era urged the American government not to drop the two bombs that effectively ended the world war.... The officials' in charge took charge and the then president Truman allowed the bomb to be released at Hiroshima.... An analysis of the statements of the Secretary of State when the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima indicates that the government had taken into consideration the views of scientists and war analysts on the issue in Japan (Bruce 42)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Should the US have dropped the bomb on Hiroshima

The bombings on hiroshima and nagasaki were not only disastrous but also despising and shocking for the whole world, while the imprints of the incident still lie in the hearts of people whether or not related to the bombings.... Another justification in the favor of the bombings provided by the United States was that the two targeted cities, hiroshima and nagasaki, would have been destructed in any case with the use of fire bombs which were already being used in the war....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Terrible Truth behind a Shocking Decision

This paper seeks an overall understanding with regards to a historical interpretation of the decisions that led to the United States dropping the atomic bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki in 1945.... These children were all busily working in the city center at the moment the bomb was dropped.... The analysis seeks why the atomic bomb was used in the final days of the Second World War.... The preceding quote was but one account of a young girl named Setsuko from the city of hiroshima who lived through the horror of the bombing that ultimately brought the Empire of Japan to its knees after nearly 45 years of continuous war and conquest....
16 Pages (4000 words) Research Paper

Trumans Decision regarding the Atomic Bombs

Controversies President Truman experienced many dilemmas that influenced his decision to drop the Atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.... The Atomic bombing of the two Japanese cities hiroshima and nagasaki is an event surrounded by controversy till date.... The Japanese government even rejected the proposal made in Potsdam Declaration that proposed the Japanese armed forces to surrender or else face “prompt and utter destruction” (The bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

The Decision to Drop the Bomb

In the paper “the decision to drop the bomb” the author discusses the atomic bomb dropped over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which was one of the most devastating effects of the Second World War.... the decision to drop the bomb to Japan was considered after Germany surrendered (Studs).... ritics also argue that there was an element of racism, why was the bomb drooped on Japan and not Germany, was it because greater precautions were exercised in considering to drop the bomb on Germany which was a "white" nation and less care was taken against Japan as they were "yellow"....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

THE DECISION TO DROP THE ATOMIC BOMB ON HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI

It can be referred to the fact that a great number of people dies every month in war time, still considering the decision to drop the ATOMIC BOMB ON HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI History, Essay March 6, The only example of nuclear weapons usage in the history of mankind is bombing of Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II.... First of all, let's see what facts may prove the justification of dropping the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Can the the Atomic Bomb dropping on Hiroshima and Nagasaki be ever justified

This essay "Can the Atomic Bomb dropping on hiroshima and nagasaki be ever justified" argues different positions regarding the issue.... or those that condone its use, the moral questions are satisfied because, though many thousands were killed or maimed, the bomb saved many more thousands of lives on both sides.... This is not sufficient justification for others who believe the use of the bomb was wrong given any criteria of moral judgment.... Did President Truman authorize the bombing solely as a means to put an end to a bloody, prolonged conflict and to ultimately save both American and Japanese lives due to an impending invasion on Japan's homeland or was the decision based on assuring that the Soviet Union would not have a say in post-war Asia is it had in post-war Europe?...
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

The Negative Effects of Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Although the reasons behind why American had taken a decision to drop such disastrous bombs in two of the most economically important cities in Japan are still a matter of debate.... In the following paper “The Negative Effects of Atomic Bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki” the author discusses the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki by America, which has been one of the most controversial events in world history in the last century.... Third, America was fully aware of Japan's impending decision to surrender because America had been able to decode Japanese diplomatic messages....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us