The Protection of Animal Rights - Assignment Example

?Animal Rights The rights of animals can be argued by many. Many feel that humans are dominant over animals so that gives the animals less rights. Others may argue that animals deserve as many rights as humans. Whichever argument one may take sides on, it is apparent that animals are alive just like humans. Animals can be ones best friend and animals can protect. Animals are able to show feeling. Showing feeling and the ability to know what is right or wrong leaves room for judgment. If animals can be judged for their actions then they have every right as anyone else. Animals can talk as they talk to their like kind. Just because humans cannot understand them does not mean that an animal should not be able to defend themselves. This may be hard for someone believing animals have no rights to understand. It is important to consider that people who believe that animals have no rights are of a different mind frame then other who do. This can be further explained when discussing poachers. People who hunt an animal that is soon to be extinct obviously do not care about animal rights or the sustainability of humans. When an animal leaves the environment this creates a gap in the food chain. The gap in the food chain creates a problem for other animals. If an individual does not care about animal and human life why should they care about animal rights? It is important to consider the different types of individuals that are against animal rights. There whole outlook on life is different. It is likely that a disagreement with someone on animal’s rights is likely to cause a disagreement in other topics of conversation. Since this is likely it is important to bring facts when arguing a certain topic. Facts are important when discussing a topic such as animal rights. Animals Do Have Right Similar To the Rights of Humans There are many different factors to agree upon when discussing why animals have right. As mentioned in the paper by Tibor Machan, animals act in a way that humans do. Animals are able to love, show compassion, and protect. Since animals show feelings similar to humans, why should they deserve less? The answer to that is that they don’t deserve less. They have the right to the same rights as humans. Would this be different if animals were able to speak better and be understood by people? It may be human’s ignorance of animal speech that creates a communication boundary. It is possibly that a human own ignorance towards animals allows for the thought that humans are more superior. This is where I have the strongest argument. There are some people that are able to study animals and communicate with them. Being able to communicate with animals break the barrier and allows other to be shown that the animals have feelings. Animals are no less than a person. Animals are here to protect, provide food, love and obey. Since animals are owned by humans it is the humans right to take care of the animals. Taking care of the animals means sticking up for the rights of animals. Acting in humanly to animals should be punished just like any other wrong act. Animals are alive just like humans. Taking a life from animals for game reasons and testing should be punishable by law. Animals were put on this earth to enable human survival and not to be used in a game or testing. These acts are cruel and it takes a cruel person to perform such acts. It is not just the rights of animals that is important to focus on but the nature of what is right and wrong. As mentioned in the paper, parents teach their children to be kind to animals in some parts of the world and are honored in other parts for killing for fun. That said it is the parent responsibility to ensure that children are taught the correct morals and values that honor life. Being taught to respect animals can lead to the respect of other things in life. It is wrong to think that killing animals for pleasure is okay. This type of thinking is not okay and can lead to other wrong violent behavior. Killing is killing regardless if it is a human or animal. Since it is not okay to kill a human for fun, it is not okay to kill an animal for fun. Animals are able to reproduce like humans so they should be respected like humans. Standing Up for what is Right The article talks about animal’s rights enthusiast fighting against animals testing. This is important because there needs to be people out there that are able to stand up for the rights of animals. What happens to these animals while they are tested should be considered torture. If this type of treatment was performed on humans it could be compared to events like the holocaust. The animals are forced to live in tiny cages and shown no love. The animals are burned and made sick. This type of treatment is cruel and inhumane. It is obvious that animals do not like to be tortured by testing. Just because the animals cannot stick up for themselves does not mean that testing is okay. A human that suffers from a mental disorder and cannot talk can relate to animals. This person is mentally disabled and unable to protect themselves. Since they are unable to protect themselves does this mean that they should be tested on like animals? The answer is clearly no. The point I am making is that because the animal cannot protect and stick up for them does not mean that it’s okay to treat the animal in an inhumane manner. That is why there is usually a person that helps the disabled adult to make decisions that protect the human since the human cannot protect their self. Those protecting animals are showing the same type of protection. Conclusion Animals do have rights. Anyone thinking otherwise is not thinking on a moral and humane level. Humans are dominant to animals which is why humans should protect the animals. The protection is important and needs to be justified. Animals are punished every day. The right they receive for punishment should also allow them the right for justice. If humans are going to try to act in a formal matter regarding animals it is important to act formally in every way. This includes allowing rights. Humans feel and animals feel. Humans love and animals love. It is proven that the love an animals can have for a human is unconditional. Shouldn’t that unconditional love be shown in return? Why is it okay to hurt a creature that only knows how to protect and love? Many may disagree saying that humans are superior and animals do not have right. Forever will I disagree with this stating that animals do have rights and should be shown the love that they show unconditionally? Read More