Business Ethics Theories - Coursework Example

Business ethics Name Course Date Introduction Business ethics is specific division of ethics solely focusing on the application of moral standards to the organization. Therefore, it cannot be separated from the common ethical ideas and the common ethical theories application to the business ethics. Ethical principles are the basis of different contemporary concepts of work, organization and business. They broaden the corporate and individual priorities further than the basic organizational objectives of shareholders enrichment and profits. Significant influence is offered by ethical factors on organizations. Ethical leadership appreciates the important role played by leaders in ensuring that the organization’s values are upheld in practice. Some correlation between leaders and ethics are intuitive (Ferrell & Fraedrich 2009). This paper will discuss the ramifications for enhancing the outline of business ethics programs. The paper will concentrate on the ethical inspiration accounts presented by principle ethical theories. Deontological ethics, utilitarianism and virtue ethics mostly offer various criteria of judgment to encounter ethical dilemmas in relation to James Hardie case study. Business ethics Business ethics which is also referred to as corporate ethics is a manifestation of professional ethics or applied ethics that analyzes ethical standards and ethical or moral issues that emerge in an organization. Business ethics applies to all parts of corporate behavior and is pertinent to the behavior of people and business associations all in all. Applied ethics is a section of ethics that is concerned with ethical inquiries in numerous fields like legal, technical, business ethics and medical (De George 2001). Business ethics can be mutually a descriptive and a normative discipline. The field is mainly normative as a corporate practice and descriptive in an academic approach. The normative ethical hypothesis provides various moral theories. Each theory stipulates a set of moral regulations that can be applied by individuals to decide if an action is ethically right or wrong in different situations (De George 2006). The research conducted on the role of ethical hypothesis in corporate focus on the use of ethical principles in the human resource sector in additional to the evaluation of the ethical assessment of the manager. A number of the research tries to recognize the fundamental ethical regulation that can be followed by individuals in business or else to stipulate framework for an ethical principle to use in the process of decision making. The ethical principles are a derivative from diverse customary ethical theories (De George 2001). The process of making ethical decisions is illustrated in research and theory as a procedure that is made up of numerous stages. Each and every stage is affected by diverse situational, individual and environmental variables. The process is described as a model comprised of four components in which an ethical leader has to first appreciate the ethics issue, deliver an ethical judgment, give ethical concerns the first priority as opposed to other concerns and lastly act in accordance with these ethical concerns. The research conducted on ethical decision making has prioritized studying the impacts of surrounding factors and personal characteristics on the process (De George 2006). Theories Utilitarianism is a hypothesis in regularizing morals holding that the best possible strategy is a particular case that amplifies utility, typically characterized as boosting aggregate profit and lessening enduring or the negatives (Bowie 1999). According to Boje (2008), Utilitarianism is a standout amongst the most influential and convincing methodologies to regularizing morals ever. Despite the fact that not completely verbalized until the nineteenth century, proto-utilitarian positions might be recognized all around the historical backdrop of moral hypothesis (Bowie 1999). Despite that, there are numerous mixed bags of the perspective talked about; utilitarianism is for the most part held to be the view that the ethically right movement is the activity that processes the greatest. There are numerous approaches to illuminate this general case. One thing to note is that the hypothesis is a manifestation of consequentialism: the right movement is seen totally regarding results transformed. What recognizes utilitarianism from pride need to do with the extent of the pertinent results? On the utilitarian view, one should augment the general great — that is, think about the benefit of other people and one's greed (Boje 2008). The managerial morals of James Hardie are utilitarian perspective. Diminish MacDonald; the President of James Hardie settles on every choice is exclusively on the premise of profit that was a good decision for the management (Sexton 2014). The Kantian deontology theory states that everybody is ethically required to operate according to a distinctive set of rules not considering what the outcome will be. He was of the view that good will was the highest good (Altman 2007). To act from good will is to act from duty. According to Kant, the intent of acting is what makes a real action but not the result. A morally motivated action is the only truly moral. Ethical actions are not subject to alteration by motives which are contaminated by self interests. Since the great demonstrations of even the most edified businesses are quite often advocated to some degree in light of the fact that such activities are gainful. It may give the idea that even the best activities of the best companies are not positively moral (Belak & Rozman 2012). In James Hardie case It was evident afterwards that the compensation fund would run out within a period of three years, and the research foundation had no legal grounds to ask for more funding from the group to cater for the compensation. This shows that James Hardie group was running away from the asbestos liabilities which a wrong decision (Sexton 2014). John Rawls' theory of Justice is an approach to ethics which dictates that all individuals should be treated in an equal measure throughout the society. Race, creed, position, class and rank should not be an obstacle to justice (Cohen 2010). In business ethics hypothesis, this is regarded the fairness approach. There must be a justifiable reason if individuals are not given the same treatment. For example, if an employee receives a higher salary than the other, it must be on technical skills or the selectiveness of the job position (Cohen 2010). James Hardie Company did not use this theory in that not all employees affected by the asbestos were compensated (Sexton 2014). Ethical issues faced by leaders The ethical leadership challenges are an ever- present issue for leaders and scholars in diverse fields. Ethical misconduct is among the multitude sturdy challenges faced by leaders in the globalized business environment. There is no one time solution that would make sure that the staffs are ethically upright. It is important for a leader to understand how to lead the organizational culture. This is to make sure that behavior and ethical decision making becomes the norm. These practices must be constantly honored and practiced. Strong organizational culture founded on ethics is an important factor of any business success (De George 1994). Human resource management issues There have emerged new moral issues for human resource managers with the market globalization and the rise of progressively substantial, intricate multinational organizations. Specifically, the mixing of dialects, societies and methods for working together make a minefield of difficulties. In the present day, human resource managers are forced to make troublesome choices to seal these holes to make the organization amicable and to guarantee the organization is working inside worthy practices in every nation in which it works together (Grobler et al. 2013). Managers who manage Multinational companies unavoidably deal with miscommunication and absence of cultural mindfulness. The managers must set up their employees for proper lead before sending them abroad. Preparing and social classes help to illuminate representatives about distinctive traditions and practices abroad. An absence of social mindfulness could be indicated by an absence of admiration for the traditionalist or liberal nature of different societies. HR supervisors ought to expect obligation regarding giving workers the right learning to effectively explore social issues in outside nations (De George 1994). Human resource experts have to guarantee the business stays consistent with hostile to segregation and provocation laws. Harassment and discrimination of workers on the premise of race, religion or sex is a moral issue which the human resource workforce confronts every day. Laws that disallow oppressive conduct, for example, the Civil Rights Act and Americans With Disabilities Act assist Human Resource agents create awareness and training projects to avoid segregation and harassment in the working environment. These laws likewise secure methods human resource may apply to the discipline and report workers who show improper oppressive conduct (Grobler et al. 2013). The human resource department is concerned with quite a number of the employee’s aspects related to firing, benefits, hiring, leaves and compensation. The human resource personnel access the employee’s private information. Many HR personnel face the ethical challenge of keeping this information private. The personnel have a duty to keep the employee’s personal information confident (De George 1994). HR personnel have a challenge of maintaining the safety of the organization’s employees. It is the duty of the department to correct and prevent any situations that are potentially dangerous. The HR department has to swiftly act on hazardous circumstances that are a source of safety concern at the place of work (Grobler et al. 2013). Human Resource personnel have a responsibility to identify any prospective dangerous workers and make sure they do not cause havoc in the workplace or otherwise harm other employees as well as themselves (SIMS 2003). Implications of applying ethics in business There are two fundamental methodologies to incorporating ethics in an organization: the action based methodology, plus the agent based methodology. The conventional methodology is action based in that it concentrates on creating principles or rules to compel administration's activities. These guidelines or rules patent themselves in corporate sets of principles, or codes of ethics (De George 2006). On the other hand, instead of the action based focus in light of principles overseeing activity, the agent based methodology concerns the crucial character and inspirations of the individual agent. Under the agent based methodology, moral conduct is not constrained to adherence to a principle or rule yet rather includes the individual reasonably seeking after good magnificence as an objective all by itself. Generally, morals get to be integral to the levelheadedness idea as a destination as opposed to a stipulation: "something decidedly great, something to be looked for after (Koslowski 2000). The clear cut basic has expansive ramifications to associations. In the first case, it battles that we should not to treat individuals just as a means yet as rather with deference for personhood and humankind. Since associations are controlled by individuals, it coherently follows that the way individuals are dealt with in an association figures out if the association is morally upright or not. It is additionally contended that associations have the ability to make transactions and in this way fits the bill for moral judgment (SIMS 2003). Instead of venturing outside one's expert role, goodness morals would have one assess a morally charged choice from inside that role. Morals gets to be context oriented and associated with a given individual and circumstance, as opposed to particular and conceptual to individual and place. This is obviously an altogether different idea to that of morals as adherence to a set of unique doctrine, which is so basic in contemporary expert sets of accepted rules (Koslowski 2000). For instance, a financial accountant may have the capacity to improve her organization's accounted for results of operations by making a deal leaseback plan whereby a portion of the organization's benefits are sold (Koslowski 2000). An increase is recorded, all the proper bookkeeping proclamations are held fast to, and the organization still has utilization of its advantages. The plan of the transaction was never to free the organization of undesirable holdings, yet rather to record an increase and subsequently conceivably abstain from contravening debt covenant assertion or evade administrative necessities (Conroy, Emerson & Pons 2010). So as to inspect whether this illustration of inventive money related bookkeeping is untrustworthy, action based methodologies would have the individual venture out of her bookkeeping role and wear the cap of a Kantian (e.g., does this activity damage the privileges of clients of the financial proclamations to decently introduced budgetary information?), or of an utilitarian (e.g., does this activity expand the interests of each and every stakeholder?) (Sandel 2013). In this approach, the operator receives a kind of good schizophrenia in which being a decent expert in the feeling of being a financially powerful bookkeeper gets to be divisible from being a decent expert in the feeling of being an ethical bookkeeper. Subsequently, given this action based methodology, a bookkeeper could be a "decent" bookkeeper, in the feeling of being exceptionally proficient and successful, yet in the meantime not be a "decent" bookkeeper, in the feeling of being ethical (Conroy, Emerson & Pons 2010). Conclusion Business ethics promoters try to test the social authenticity of suppositions, for example, org hypothesis, which advertised the thought that business managers were just determined without anyone else present-interest. The hypothesis is they have to be incentivized to adjust their diversions to shareholders. The going hand in hand with reason is that business' essential part is to convey greatest shareholder profits. Numerously contend that the organization hypothesis turned into a fulfilling toward oneself prediction that prompted the development of managerial world class that legitimized disgusting motivator bundles and served to produce an era of irreverent managers. Kant’s moral doctrine, utilitarianism and social justice theories can be applied in business or organizational ethics References Altman, MC 2007, ‘The decomposition of the corporate body: What Kant cannot contribute to business ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 253-266. Belak, J & Rozman, MP 2012, ‘Business ethics from Aristotle, Kant and Mill's perspectives’, Kybernetes, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1607-1624. Boje, D. M 2008, Critical Theory Ethics for Business and Public Administration, Information Age Publishing, Charlotte. Bowie, N. E 1999, Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective, Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey. Cohen, M 2010, 'The narrow application of Rawls in business ethics: A political conception of both stakeholder theory and the morality of markets', Journal Of Business Ethics, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 563-579. Conroy, S.J., Emerson, T.L.N & Pons, F 2010, Ethical Attitudes of Accounting Practitioners: Are Rank and Ethical Attitudes Related? Journal of Business Ethics, 91, p. 183-194 De George, R 2006, ‘The relevance of philosophy to business ethics: A response to Rorty’s ‘Is philosophy relevant to applied ethics?’, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 381-389. De George, R 2001, ‘Law and ethics in the information age’, Business and Professional Ethics Journal, Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 5-18. De George, R 1994, ‘International business ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-9. De George, R 1987, ‘The status of business ethics: Past and future’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 6, pp. 201-211. Ferrell, OC & Fraedrich, J 2009, Business ethics 2009 update: Ethical decision making and cases, Cengage Learning, USA. Grobler, P., Bothma, R., Brewster, C., Carey, L., Holland, P & Warnich, S 2013, Contemporary issues in human resource management (4th ed.), Oxford, South Africa. (Chs 8 & 9). Koslowski, P 2000, Contemporary Economic Ethics and Business Ethics, Springer, USA. Sandel, MJ 2013, ‘Market reasoning as moral reasoning: Why economists should re-engage with political philosophy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 27, pp. 121-40. Sexton, E 2004, "Lawyer's notes add to Hardie's asbestos saga", The Age, Retrieved Oct 16, 2014. SIMS, RR 2003, Ethics and corporate social responsibility: Why giants fall, Praeger, USA. Appendix Crisis Management: James Hardie case study James Hardie is a world pioneer in fiber bond engineering, made in 1937. It is working in the United States, Australia and New Zealand. Presently, James Hardie is additionally venturing into Asia, with an assembling plant in the Philippines, and into Europe. As indicated by their site affirmation, their point and development method are: • Create esteem for clients and shareholders. • Aggressively developing fiber concrete organizations in businesses and seeing new markets. • Establish a separate aggressive. • Maintaining the authority in innovation, assembling, items and brand administration. James Hardie Company is a largest user of asbestos in Australia. Asbestos causes a serious health risk. The company became aware o f these risks and the health problems related with asbestos that were affecting its employees I n the 1960s. The company labeled their products beginning the year 1978 with stickers warning the handlers that the dust can cause cancer. The company started making compensation to some of its employees and later stopped the production of asbestos. The number of illnesses and deaths related to asbestos increased and the company set up investigation to decide the amount required for compensation. A subsidiary of the company, Medical Research and Compensation Foundation (MRCF) was set up and equipped with $300 million to cater for compensation. The subsidiary would later run out of money. The company set out the medical research and compensation foundation plus a specific amount of money to compensate the asbestos victims. It was evident afterwards that the compensation fund would run out within a period of three years, and the research foundation had no legal grounds to ask for more funding from the group to cater for the compensation. Read More

The process is described as a model comprised of four components in which an ethical leader has to first appreciate the ethics issue, deliver an ethical judgment, give ethical concerns the first priority as opposed to other concerns and lastly act in accordance with these ethical concerns. The research conducted on ethical decision making has prioritized studying the impacts of surrounding factors and personal characteristics on the process (De George 2006). Theories Utilitarianism is a hypothesis in regularizing morals holding that the best possible strategy is a particular case that amplifies utility, typically characterized as boosting aggregate profit and lessening enduring or the negatives (Bowie 1999).

According to Boje (2008), Utilitarianism is a standout amongst the most influential and convincing methodologies to regularizing morals ever. Despite the fact that not completely verbalized until the nineteenth century, proto-utilitarian positions might be recognized all around the historical backdrop of moral hypothesis (Bowie 1999). Despite that, there are numerous mixed bags of the perspective talked about; utilitarianism is for the most part held to be the view that the ethically right movement is the activity that processes the greatest.

There are numerous approaches to illuminate this general case. One thing to note is that the hypothesis is a manifestation of consequentialism: the right movement is seen totally regarding results transformed. What recognizes utilitarianism from pride need to do with the extent of the pertinent results? On the utilitarian view, one should augment the general great — that is, think about the benefit of other people and one's greed (Boje 2008). The managerial morals of James Hardie are utilitarian perspective.

Diminish MacDonald; the President of James Hardie settles on every choice is exclusively on the premise of profit that was a good decision for the management (Sexton 2014). The Kantian deontology theory states that everybody is ethically required to operate according to a distinctive set of rules not considering what the outcome will be. He was of the view that good will was the highest good (Altman 2007). To act from good will is to act from duty. According to Kant, the intent of acting is what makes a real action but not the result.

A morally motivated action is the only truly moral. Ethical actions are not subject to alteration by motives which are contaminated by self interests. Since the great demonstrations of even the most edified businesses are quite often advocated to some degree in light of the fact that such activities are gainful. It may give the idea that even the best activities of the best companies are not positively moral (Belak & Rozman 2012). In James Hardie case It was evident afterwards that the compensation fund would run out within a period of three years, and the research foundation had no legal grounds to ask for more funding from the group to cater for the compensation.

This shows that James Hardie group was running away from the asbestos liabilities which a wrong decision (Sexton 2014). John Rawls' theory of Justice is an approach to ethics which dictates that all individuals should be treated in an equal measure throughout the society. Race, creed, position, class and rank should not be an obstacle to justice (Cohen 2010). In business ethics hypothesis, this is regarded the fairness approach. There must be a justifiable reason if individuals are not given the same treatment.

For example, if an employee receives a higher salary than the other, it must be on technical skills or the selectiveness of the job position (Cohen 2010). James Hardie Company did not use this theory in that not all employees affected by the asbestos were compensated (Sexton 2014). Ethical issues faced by leaders The ethical leadership challenges are an ever- present issue for leaders and scholars in diverse fields. Ethical misconduct is among the multitude sturdy challenges faced by leaders in the globalized business environment.

Read More