Love Ethical Standards in the film The Inside Man - Report Example

BUSINESS ETHICS It is possible to do the ethical dead by breaking the law. The research focuses on the four characters of the Spike Lee film, The Inside Man. The research centers on the several concepts including “Act‐ and Rule‐ Utilitarianism (West 67) “Consequentialism” (Tim Mulgan 53), “Rights and Justice v. Monetary Value”, “Kantian Ethics” (Wood 25), “Virtue Ethics” (Darwall 105), and “Social Responsibility” (Werther 5). Concepts are made to explain the action or inaction benchmarks, especially in business dealings. Dalton Russell. Dalton Russell is a good example of Rule Utilitarianism In terms of “Act‐ and Rule‐ Utilitarianism, Dalton Russell pretends to rob a bank in order to bring Case to justice. Case, the bank founder is has been receiving money from the Nazis in exchange for Case’s supporting the killing of the innocent Jews. Russell also complies with the Rights Justice versus monetary value theory. Russell impresses on the police officers that the robbers are not intending to rob the bank. Russell makes the officers feel that they did not enter the bank to rob the bank (rights and justice versus monetary value). In terms of “Consequentialism”, Dalton Russell does not care if he gets caught for faking the bank robbery. Russell feels that the end justifies the means. He fakes the robbery in order to get Swastika, the evidence that will pin down Arthur Case. Arthur Case should be pinned down as a person who benefitted from the Nazi war operations. In terms of “Rights and Justice v. Monetary Value”, Russell focuses on punishing Arthur Case. Arthur Case should be brought justice for receiving money from German donors. The victims of the Nazi gas chambers have the right to punish their assailants, including Arthur Case. Russell real goal is find the Swastika to make Arthur Case, Bank owner, pay for his evil deeds during the dreaded Nazi era. In terms of “Kantian Ethics”, Russell must comply with the law at all cost, if caught. Russell orders pizza so in order to feed his companions. He does not want to steal pizza. Russell also shows that Arthur Case should be punished, without exception. Unlike utilitarianism, the end does not justify the means in Kantian Ethics. In terms of “Virtue Ethics”, Russell embodies what is morally right. Russell‘s job is to ensure that everyone must comply with virtue ethics. Russell feels that Arthur Case’s past violates Virtue Ethics. Russell finally gets the Swastika from the bank vault to make Arthur Case pay for his deadly sins. In terms of “Social Responsibility”, Russell is complying with his social responsibility. Russell’s social responsibility is to ensure he does not cause harm to his community by not harming the bank hostages. This also includes Russell’s setting up the fake bank robbery in order to bring out Arthur Case’ hidden past as a Nazi financial beneficiary. Detective Keith Frazier. In terms of “Act‐ and Rule‐ Utilitarianism, Keith Frazier feels that he must act the part to bring Russell to justice. Keith Frazier’s police force uses every means to arrest Russell. This includes giving free pizza to Russell however, Keith Frazier’s group is able to smuggle bugs into the bank. The bugs are eavesdropping devices that can hear what the people are talking about. Keith Frazier offers Russell an escape plane in exchange for the freedom of the bank hostages. In terms of “Consequentialism”, Keith Frazier uses every means to achieve his end, the safety of the bank hostages. The free pizza offer is one of the means of enticing Russell not to harm the hostages. The use of the free plane is another good means to ensure the safety of the bank hostages. Keith Frazier finally uses smoke bombs to rescue the hostages. In terms of “Rights and Justice v. Monetary Value”, Keith Frazier places importance on the rights of the bank hostages by allowing the robbers to ride the plane with their money. Keith Frazier orders the police to finally storm the bank in order to bring the robbers to justice. Keith Frazier allows Russell to escort him inside the bank to see the rights of the bank hostage are cared for. Keith Frazier prioritizes the safety of the bank hostages, without thinking of Keith Frazier’s own safety at the hands of the bank robbers. In terms of “Kantian Ethics”, Keith Frazier must obey the law at all cost. The law states that Keith Frazier must capture Russell at all legal costs. Keith Frazier’s obeys that Kantian ethics where giving free pizza must be complied without thinking if the giving of pizza because the hostages’ safety is paramount. The law states he must obey the hostages’ demands, without thinking of the consequences. Keith Frazier must pay for the pizza and not steal the pizza. Unlike utilitarianism, the end does not justify the means in Kantian Ethics. In terms of “Virtue Ethics”, Frazier embodies what is morally right. Frazier’s job is to ensure that everyone must comply with virtue ethics. Those who do not comply will be arrested and put to jail. Frazier is bent on arresting the robbers for violating virtue ethics. Virtue ethics includes avoiding robbery of banks. Virtue ethics includes arresting the bank robberies at minimum hostage damage. In terms of “Social Responsibility” Keith Frazier is complying with his social responsibility. Keith Frazier’s social responsibility is to ensure Russell does not cause harm to the bank hostages. Keith Frazier must storm the bank premises in order to put a stop to the prolonged bank hostage drama. Keith Frazier is tasked to offer the plane in order to save the community from the possible carnage of robbers killing the hapless hostages. Madeleine White. In terms of “Act‐ and Rule‐ Utilitarianism, Madeleine White must do whatever it takes to ensure Arthur Case’s instructions are complied. Madeleine White persuades Frazier to have a meeting with Russell in order to accomplish her task of hiding the Swastika evidence. Madeleine White is an epitome of a woman who uses her prowess to enter the bank premises. Madeleine White uses the best means to successfully comply with Arthur Case’s instructions to hide the Swastika evidence. In terms of “Consequentialism”, Madeleine White knows that entering the bank endangers her life. However, doing is the only way to comply with Arthur Case’s commands. Madeleine White is a good example of a person who is intelligent enough to get the trust and confidence of Russell. Madeleine White does not care about her own life when compared to following instructions from Arthur Case. In terms of “Rights and Justice v. Monetary Value”, Madeleine White believes that Arthur Case should not be caught in exchange for money. Madeleine White does not believe that the rights of the Jew Victims is more important compared to the Arthur Case’s paying Madeleine White‘s services. Madeleine White believes she has the right to implement Arthur Case’s commands to hide the Swastika evidence. Madeleine White believes that the Swastika is more important compared to Russell’s taking away the bank’s cash. In terms of “Kantian Ethics”, Madeleine White prioritizes compliance with Arthur Case’s instructions. Madeleine White does not care about the outcome of her compliance. Madeleine White prioritizes keeping the safety deposit box of Arthur Case a secret. Madeleine White is only interested in whatever it takes to make Frazier arrange a talk with Russell, without minding the consequences of her action. In terms of “Virtue Ethics”, Madeleine White places priority on virtue ethics. Madeleine White believes that secrecy is a virtue. Madeleine White uses her persuasion virtue to successfully meet with Russell. Madeleine White implements her charm virtue to persuade the robbers not to divulge the Swastika secret. Madeleine White is convinced by Russell that Arthur Case is a criminal, by showing her the Swastika symbol. In terms of “Social Responsibility”, Madeleine White performs her social responsibility well. Madeleine White’s social responsibility includes complying with Arthur Case’s instructions. Madeleine White must not trigger the killing of the bank hostages by complying with the bank robbers’ instructions. Madeleine White completes her social responsibility role by placing the hostages’ lives in danger when she enters the bank vault. Arthur Case. In terms of “Act‐ and Rule‐ Utilitarianism, Arthur Case must do whatever it takes to ensure his evil past is kept secret. Arthur Case must employ all means to keep his past covered up. Arthur Case puts up a bank to keep his Swastika evidence tightly sealed. The bank vault is the secret hiding place of Arthur Case’s Swastika. In terms of “Consequentialism”, Arthur Case knows that letting the robbers reveal the Swastika evidence will be the end of Arthur Case’s free life. Arthur Case hires Madeleine White to cover up his past. Arthur Case fears that he is not brave enough to enter the bank himself to hide the evidence. Arthur Case fears doing the hiding himself may result to the robbers’ killing Arthur Case, a bad consequence. In terms of “Rights and Justice v. Monetary Value”, Arthur Case feels that he has the right to keep his past a secret. Arthur Case feels that financing a bank (monetary value, is reasonable since he can hide the Swastika. Arthur Case has the right to pay Madeleine White to endanger her life as she enters the bank premises. Arthur Case feels that the Jews do not have the rights make him pay for the Deaths, thus he hides the Swastika In terms of “Kantian Ethics”, Arthur Case believes that he must obey the law. The law states that Arthur Case will be punished for his past evil acts. To remedy the situation, Arthur Case hides the Swastika so he will not be jailed. The have justice, evidence must be presented. In terms of “Virtue Ethics”, Arthur Case believes in virtue ethics. By setting up a bank, he hires people to work for him. Arthur Case hides his past in order to show he has virtue. People who do not evidence of any moral violations will think a person has virtue. In terms of “Social Responsibility”, Arthur Case has a social responsibility to attend to. Arthur Case believes the hostages’ safety is paramount by not personally barging into the bank premises. Arthur Case has social responsibility to provide bank jobs to the community. Arthur Case has a social responsibility to keep his evil past tightly sealed within the bank’s premises. Arthur Case is right in allowing a third person, Madeleine White to intercede in his behalf to ensure the secrecy of his Swastika evidence. Based on the above discussion, it is possible to do the ethical dead by violating the law. The four characters of the Spike Lee film, The inside Man” movie exemplifies some of the concepts of actions and inactions. The characters fall under one or more of the concepts of “Act‐ and Rule‐ Utilitarianism “, “Consequentialism”, “Rights and Justice v. Monetary Value”, “Kantian Ethics”, “Virtue Ethics”, and “Social Responsibility”. Indeed, the concepts of actions and inactions vividly set the benchmarks for people to implement, especially in the business world’s interpersonal transactions. Works Cited Darwall, Stephen. Virtue Ethics. New York: Wiley Blackwell Press, 2003. Print. Mulgan, Tim. The Demands of Consequentialism. New York: University Press, 2005. Print. Werther, William. Strategi Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Sage Press, 2010. Print. West, Henry. The Blackwell Guide to Mills Utilitarianism. New York: Wiley Blackwell Press, 2006. Print. Wood, Allen. Kantian Ethics. New York: University Press, 2008. Print. Read More

Detective Keith Frazier. In terms of “Act‐ and Rule‐ Utilitarianism, Keith Frazier feels that he must act the part to bring Russell to justice. Keith Frazier’s police force uses every means to arrest Russell. This includes giving free pizza to Russell however, Keith Frazier’s group is able to smuggle bugs into the bank. The bugs are eavesdropping devices that can hear what the people are talking about. Keith Frazier offers Russell an escape plane in exchange for the freedom of the bank hostages.

In terms of “Consequentialism”, Keith Frazier uses every means to achieve his end, the safety of the bank hostages. The free pizza offer is one of the means of enticing Russell not to harm the hostages. The use of the free plane is another good means to ensure the safety of the bank hostages. Keith Frazier finally uses smoke bombs to rescue the hostages. In terms of “Rights and Justice v. Monetary Value”, Keith Frazier places importance on the rights of the bank hostages by allowing the robbers to ride the plane with their money.

Keith Frazier orders the police to finally storm the bank in order to bring the robbers to justice. Keith Frazier allows Russell to escort him inside the bank to see the rights of the bank hostage are cared for. Keith Frazier prioritizes the safety of the bank hostages, without thinking of Keith Frazier’s own safety at the hands of the bank robbers. In terms of “Kantian Ethics”, Keith Frazier must obey the law at all cost. The law states that Keith Frazier must capture Russell at all legal costs.

Keith Frazier’s obeys that Kantian ethics where giving free pizza must be complied without thinking if the giving of pizza because the hostages’ safety is paramount. The law states he must obey the hostages’ demands, without thinking of the consequences. Keith Frazier must pay for the pizza and not steal the pizza. Unlike utilitarianism, the end does not justify the means in Kantian Ethics. In terms of “Virtue Ethics”, Frazier embodies what is morally right. Frazier’s job is to ensure that everyone must comply with virtue ethics.

Those who do not comply will be arrested and put to jail. Frazier is bent on arresting the robbers for violating virtue ethics. Virtue ethics includes avoiding robbery of banks. Virtue ethics includes arresting the bank robberies at minimum hostage damage. In terms of “Social Responsibility” Keith Frazier is complying with his social responsibility. Keith Frazier’s social responsibility is to ensure Russell does not cause harm to the bank hostages. Keith Frazier must storm the bank premises in order to put a stop to the prolonged bank hostage drama.

Keith Frazier is tasked to offer the plane in order to save the community from the possible carnage of robbers killing the hapless hostages. Madeleine White. In terms of “Act‐ and Rule‐ Utilitarianism, Madeleine White must do whatever it takes to ensure Arthur Case’s instructions are complied. Madeleine White persuades Frazier to have a meeting with Russell in order to accomplish her task of hiding the Swastika evidence. Madeleine White is an epitome of a woman who uses her prowess to enter the bank premises.

Madeleine White uses the best means to successfully comply with Arthur Case’s instructions to hide the Swastika evidence. In terms of “Consequentialism”, Madeleine White knows that entering the bank endangers her life. However, doing is the only way to comply with Arthur Case’s commands. Madeleine White is a good example of a person who is intelligent enough to get the trust and confidence of Russell. Madeleine White does not care about her own life when compared to following instructions from Arthur Case.

In terms of “Rights and Justice v. Monetary Value”, Madeleine White believes that Arthur Case should not be caught in exchange for money. Madeleine White does not believe that the rights of the Jew Victims is more important compared to the Arthur Case’s paying Madeleine White‘s services.

Read More