Ethical Violations Alleged on Charles Rangel - Case Study Example

Ethical Violations Alleged on Charles Rangel United s Representative, Mr. Charles Rangel was censured on an attempt that he has violated eleven rules of house (Condon, 2010). As a matter of fact he told wrongly about his income to the service of internal revenue and utilized his influence to bring about his impropriety in respect of representing congress. The panel of ethics members extended their recommendation for censure of the representative due to the fact that he created an anomaly in terms of following ethics in his approach. This necessitated his censure of full house. Such a step happens to be a most grave measure of discipline that is prevalent for law makers to encounter certainty of expulsion. In spite of the fact his representation in twenty terms of congress has accredited him with special consideration. He had to encounter conviction due to the fact of his violation of rules. Various rules are to be complied with for the purposes of ensuring such action to be devoid of for a long time. (bbc.co.uk, 2010). Mr. Charles Rangel was accused of 13 ethical violations paving the way for problematic months of trial before the occurrence of midterm elections. The charges were embodied in a statement containing forty pages with an accent of bipartisan panel that the democrat of New York had solicited impropriety for accentuating that ignore stating his name including myriads of dollars in disproportionate income as well as assets including statements of disclosure (bbc.co.uk, 2010). The allegations created by throwing a light on the deliberations of the committee’s couple of years’ investigation into the conduct of the representative. The capability also involves minute analysis of various charges that have been leveled against representative for bringing about conformity in lying with ethical committee for ethical violations necessitating penal action. The investigative panel also brought about a problem for the purposes of ensuring ethical conformity. The charges leveled against also involved unethical regulation on income and wealth creation. As a matter of fact the above are the reasons and charges leveled against Mr. Rangel for bringing about an analysis of charges that were alleged against Mr. Rangel for development of a positive thrust for ensuring success in not leveling such charges against the individual whatsoever (Doyle, 2010, 202). It is very essential that such aspects should be given thought of and should be clearly understood to enable long term stability in ethical committee for bringing about such a situation. He also did not appear to create an atmosphere that would bring up the questions including Mr. Rangel’s expulsion from his given task. As a matter of fact background is good and he should substantiate and be worthy of the maintenance of ethical standards in his dealing in ordinary course of business. Various capabilities that were prevalent in Mr. Rangel for the development of an idea that it is essential for various people to understand assimilate and create simulations in the clearance of various matters. There are more factors that have reminiscences of deceit manipulations in real estate and tax fraud during the advent of career. In accordance with reports various financial disclosure statements reported his net worth that hovered around $500,000 as well as $1.3 million in the year 2007 and in the year 2009 one million dollars to 2.5 million dollars. He has also been criticized for selling his grandmother’s property for nearly $420,000 as well as his questionable trips to Caribbean islands for practices of fund raising. Various ideas have cropped up for application of tax breaks and a plan to organize a project for nine million dollars for real estate expansion. All these arguments were leveled for having an assessment and test for the success of his position as the chairman of the ethical committee (Miller, 2010, 65). Mr. Rangel also encountered the problem of violation of sponsorships of corporate in the year 2007 as well as in the year 2008 in conformity with transgression of chambers rules on gift. The ethics committee has been undertaking its examination for approximately a couple of years involving Rangel himself including the use of his apartment that was rent controlled and charges level against raising of funds for centre of Charles Rangel under the aegis of public service in the city of New York. Mr. Rangel himself gave his representations to the effect that the charges leveled against him were not proper and he decided to ease himself out and decided to get re-elected in New York for a 21st couple of years term. There were also findings that corruption charge leveled against him was found to be baseless and wrong. Mr. Rangel was also leveled charges against 13 ethical values and violations and he had to walk out of trial in front of his defense attorney of Washington. There are certain aspects covering issues such as no lawyer availability to defending for ethical lapses. There have been reports that corruption charges have been found to be non-existent in various cross sections of media and a proper base and investigations should be conducted for the purpose of this article to defend Mr. Rangel against allegations leveled against him. There are various aspects that would cover the broad range of unearthing the truth and making justice prevail for establishment of a base for getting absolute acquittal from the charges leveled against him. This is based on non-existence of corruption, non-deceit and commensurate with income the acquisition of property and his effective office management techniques for his personal office for ensuring his dignity. The various ways and means of raising funds are for actual uplifting the economic process to the effect that benefit ultimately reaches all concerned for deriving benefit in multifarious ways. Mr. Rangel’s counsel also came out with the candid and truthful statement that ethical committee did not allow him the aspects of protection of due process rights and engaging a defense counsel for making a defense of his charges. He also wanted that there should be a fair treatment that should be meted out on him for enabling him to prove his statements and actions that were taken in the best interests of the country of United States of America. This is intended for extending the truthful bestowments of benefits that would ultimately reach the recipients and the cause for which donations and fund raising aspects stand and the betterment of the society takes place in general. Mr. Rangel did not disclose his assets worth $600,000 reported to congress and he did not report to internal revenue service about income generated from rental properties through the resorts and the Dominican Republic. Hence, it goes on to prove that he had undisclosed assets worth several thousand dollars by proving himself negligent in protecting the august public office for protecting the best interests of the people of New York city as well as United States of America. There is a fundamental duty that is known as fiduciary that necessitates additional income made or secret income made to be disclosed above board as well as not to make secret profits. Hence, when all the assets and earnings get the cloak of legality and cleared from all concerned in spite of maintenance of diligence and integrity would only ensure non-censure in public office. As a matter of fact there is no harm to be worldly-wise but, once an opportunity is afforded it is essential that preemptions should be made from various prior actions and they should be saved from taking refuge of the legal provisions and taking full advantage of flexibility afforded by law to maximize the contribution in august public office as well as maintaining worldly-wise wealth creation individually. Hence, the ethical committee based on allegations of deceit non-disclosure of assets disproportionate to the income as well as making late payments or non-payments of taxes compelled the ethical committee to take a stringent action against Mr. Rangel (Rowley, 2010). It should be noted and it is pertinent in this context that every person should be afforded the principles of natural justice to justify his actions against allegations and fair opportunity should be provided when all the allegations are proved to be nothing but, unproved and untruth. The objective of federal democracy is to ensure that such opportunities should be provided to all concerned and this aspect should be borne in mind while taking such actions as well as exonerating such people in political career. On the basis of accusations Mr. Rangel was found to be guilty and as he is intending standing for elections once again he should be afforded an opportunity in case charges proved are pardonable (Rowley, 2010). The controversial case rests on the edifice of ethics in governmental affairs and it is essential that corruption should not be leveled against an individual. It is also customary to encounter trials in political career as it has affected many great statesmen as well as knowledgeable people who have been in power and in governance including Adolf Hitler. There have been circumstances when there has been an upsurge of mob agitation against such people. A diplomatic and strong handling and ensuring clear proven facts are the need of the hour to encounter such attacks. This matter happens to be only on ethical grounds and steps should be taken to improve prudent and astute financial as well as disciplined prudence. On the one hand, it creates improvement in wealth and at the same time contributes to the societal benefits as well as benefits to the organizations and cause. This is pertinent in the process of raising funds and appropriate disclosure backed by funds for projecting an image of propriety and proving it to the core throughout. It should also be noted that a wholesome creation of various aspects of governance is plausible and at the same time create abundance of wealth for sustenance in an ethical manner. There are ways and means of ingenuously create better way of making ethical funds to the maximum without risk of getting caught on the wrong foot by an application of mind and intellect. This also includes strong foundation of continuous education and explosion of latest trends and knowledge of various fields of investment. Whenever such precautions are undertaken with the knowledge of legislation and latest trends on various aspects of acquiring wealth that suits individual tastes, choices and preferences should be followed. Such angles of wealth creation should be explored in a legal manner with a blend of practicable applications that are necessitated when one to one demand is prevalent in the society and mankind for acceding for success without risk. The ethics also involve prior approval of taking financial decisions where the carte-blanche rests with higher authorities. Wherever delegations have been provided in writing individuals can exercise such financial rights and powers based on their sound judgment as well as assessment. Wherever the head honcho happens to be the same individual he can exercise financial right and powers independently taking decisions on various aspects. Such guidelines go along way in protecting good offices within the framework of ethical process that would also involve many angles of maintaining core values as well as not in a manner prejudicial to the tenets of federal constitution. The exercise of ethics can also be simplified based on the government framing up a code of ethics and standards for various decisions, disclosures as well as actions that would befit the image of the nation as well as the governmental operational efficiency and functional efficacy. Such a code of conduct could become a ready reference and further improvements could be made on them to give adequate opportunity for all concerned including president as well as governors of various states spanning various cities for enabling them to evolve a regime that would make operational hurdles easier for governance by ensuring code of conduct as well. It also rests on the attitude of an individual to maintain his strength of character and professional integrity. Works Cited Condon, Stephanie. “Ethics Committee: 13 Charges against Charlie Rangel”. cbsnews.com. 29 Jul 2010. Web 26 Nov 2010. “Democrat Charles Rangel walks out of ethics hearing”. bbc.co.uk. 15 Nov 2010. Web. 27 Nov 2010 Doyle, Jerry. Have You Seen My Country Lately?: Americas Wake-Up Call. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2010. Print Miller, Randy. Representatives Become Rulers: A Blue Collar Perspective of Government Behaviors. Indiana: Author House. 2010. Print Rowley, Charles . “Charles Rangel represents a rotten borough”. charlesrowley.wordpress.com. 16 Nov 2010. Web. 28 Nov 2010 Rowley, James and Ryan J. Donmoyer. “Republicans Say Rangel Passed on Chances to Settle Ethics Case”. bloomberg.com. 30 Jul 2010. Web. 26 Nov 2010. Read More