Renewable Energy in Australia - Report Example

Renewable Energy in Australia Name Professor Institution Course Date Renewable Energy in Australia Background Environment governance policy entails all the global stipulated rule and regulations that govern the welfare of environment. All scope of life starting from human being to animals and insects relies on environment for survival (Jessop, 2002). Natural resources such as water, air, soils and plants are the basic factors of life. Therefore, these essential natural resources need to be protected. There is a threatening environmental degradation worldwide that has been contributed by daily human activities in endeavor to sustain and improve their life. Government of various countries has contributed diversely in the squalor of the environment in the effort to improve and sustain their economy (Katrina, 2009). This has led to formation of multilateral environmental governance policy that applies to all nations to control and curb the impeding environmental degradation. This scenario espouses on the validity of the policy to the Australian nation in their effort to extract renewable energy. Analysis of Renewable Energy in Australia Australia relies on renewable energy at large scale with coal being the major source of energy. Renewable energy refers to natural occurring sources of pure energy which includes, water, wind geothermal and solar (Heynen & Robins 2005). Environmental governance policy advocates for all the programs that encompasses the sitting, extraction and financial issues that are related with usage and maintenance of the energy. In Australia, environment governance policy plays essential role in the field of renewable energy. The policy encourages the growth of renewable energy projects developers and industries by ensuring that these developers adopt proper and clean technology in extracting the energy. Renewable energy policy deals with economic factors and practices that involve the legal needs of serving the society (Katrina, 2009). The policy regulates the feed-in-tariffs that controls the renewable energy developers from exploiting the society with high prices of installation of the energy to the residents. This is implemented through setting a fix, reasonable and affordable prices as for the sale of energy produced by the renewable energy developers (Basil, 2011). The feed-in tariffs regulatory targets on improving financial assurance, by providing a cost effective and less ceremonial energy to the residents. Australia government applies environmental governing policy through encouragement of clean power mining s. These policies help to save the environment from gas pollution and global warming. Through mining of coal in Australia, it has contributed to 38 percent of carbon emission; the federal government has adopted Carbon Pollution Scheme that is an environmental governance policy. This environmental governance policy helps in reduction of carbon monoxide accumulation in the atmosphere in large quantities (Lucy, 2013). The government has also initiated a Renewable energy commercialization to curb the impeding danger of global warming and climate change risks. All the state government has put in place mandatory renewal energy target to and greenhouse gas reduction targets to minimize the effect of coal products in the atmosphere. In the effort to manage environmental governance policy, the government has supported low technology demonstration fund by allocating $500 million as competitive grants and $1 billion to private sector. Aims and Objectives of Environmental Policy This environmental governance policy initiative in Australia is aimed at achieving a sustainable economy with free devastating environmental effects. In achieving this target, the government should start investing in the rich renewable mineral resources in Australia. These should subsidize the current large scale mining of coal and uranium as source of energy. For effective implementation of the policy, the government should work in region correcting thematic environmental assessment (Bakker, 2004). This should be in effect to determining of the policy breakers and reporting them to the relevant authorities. There is a need for the government to involve international agencies like, UN that deal with global environment governance policy. International urgencies for environmental governance policy, ensures that the policy adopted by a given country are coherent with the set global environmental governance policies. The government objects to achieve its goals by ensuring of national environmental laws and institutions are better developed, strengthened and complies with the current and environmental issues. Government is also working to facilitate the processes that enhance the change of environment for sustainability and reduction of environmental pollution (Steiner & Oviir, 2010). This is made effective by supporting environmental teams like UNEP with relevant information and employing technical expertise in the energy mining industries. The government also keeps on updating on the reviewed global environmental report outlook in order to recover and improve the affected environment areas. Implications beyond the Policy The environmental governance policy affects a large scope that includes political ecology, government, and civil society as well as business. Australia relies on uranium and coal as a major source of local energy and the most commodities for export. By following all the environmental governance policy, it means that the market will be affected adversely and this affects the whole economy of the Australia (McCarthy, 2004). This means that Australia will lose its competitive value in the market. The policy also affects citizens. There are different classes of people who cannot afford to pay electrical bill in Australia, therefore this class of people can rely only on firewood for lighting and cooking. Regulation of cutting down trees makes life of this group of people uncomfortable. On the other hand, in implementing of the renewal energy policies, taxation will raise to around 40 percent. This will affect tax payers in a way that some cannot afford. This policy also does not include deforestation programs, thus there is no good timing and this results in leaving old growth forest vulnerable. The expense that will be used in reduction of coal effect and the high demand for coal-fire power by the residents is not stated. Therefore this can affect deprive the economy of the Australia (chris, 2010). The policy failure to address on the on the effect of climate change caused by burning of coal that is exported from Australia change leaves a dangerous gap. This affects global warming that not only affect human being but also affect the life of the animals. This effect, poses threat to extinction of some species. Accountability of the Policy The government, private sectors and the geosciences experts have the full mandate to develop and implement the policy. After all the policy has been formulated, the global environment governance body evaluates the policy to determine whether it correlate with the required and agreed standard (Mento, 2003). After approving the policy, environment policy agencies work in coordination with the state government to effect the implementation of the policy. Each energy producer plants and industry is subject to follow all the stipulated regulations without breaching. In case there is breaching of the law, legal action is taken to the involved party. If the government is found guilty of breaching the laws of the policy, environmental agency has power to sue the government to the global environment policy authority. Public Opinion on the Policy The development of the environmental governance policy in Australia has been viewed in a wide dimension. Public has different opinion concerning the implementation of the policy. There are a considerate number of those who support use of renewable energy and energy efficiency. On the average, about 74 percent argues that the greenhouse strategy is a reform for energy efficiency and environmental friendly measures (Hodge, 2004). Only 19 percent residents supported the nuclear power and clean core technology strategies. Public opinion on different sources of renewal energy varies in a survey conducted in 2007. 88 percent argued that government should invest more in the increase of solar power, while 78 percent considered that government should encourage on the wind energy since it has little negative impacts on the environment. The policy on renewable energy was welcomed in Australia and the public considered it as the remedy to help improve the living standard of the resident. This is evidence in the different suggestions to the government. Some urged government to make this renewable energy more affordable to the residents by reducing the price ( Castree, 2007). For example 82 percent suggested that government should make it easier for people to purchase energy efficient products such energy-saving light bulbs water-shaving shower heads and insulation. About 87 percent of the population proposed that government should encourage use of cars that use diesel instead of petrol to reduce emissions of toxic gases in the atmosphere. Outcome of the Policy The effort to implement the policy fully has a number of challenges. For the policy to be fully implemented, the government, international institutions and citizens should work together. Environmental protection measures require time, energy, money and diplomatic negotiations among all the stakeholders. The government system of Australia is subdivided into three levels, local, nation and state (Mento, 2003). These subdivisions make it impossible to effectively articulate environment governance effectively. Other impairment of the policy implementation is that there is insufficient fund to support the implementation of renewable energy projects. There many states leads to lack of consolidated integration of sector policies which delays full implementation of the policy. References Bakker, K. (2004). An uncooperative commodity: privatizing water in England and Wales. Oxford University Press. Basil, A. (2011). ‘The Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, retrieved on 13 th from Read More

Through mining of coal in Australia, it has contributed to 38 percent of carbon emission; the federal government has adopted Carbon Pollution Scheme that is an environmental governance policy. This environmental governance policy helps in reduction of carbon monoxide accumulation in the atmosphere in large quantities (Lucy, 2013). The government has also initiated a Renewable energy commercialization to curb the impeding danger of global warming and climate change risks. All the state government has put in place mandatory renewal energy target to and greenhouse gas reduction targets to minimize the effect of coal products in the atmosphere.

In the effort to manage environmental governance policy, the government has supported low technology demonstration fund by allocating $500 million as competitive grants and $1 billion to private sector. Aims and Objectives of Environmental Policy This environmental governance policy initiative in Australia is aimed at achieving a sustainable economy with free devastating environmental effects. In achieving this target, the government should start investing in the rich renewable mineral resources in Australia.

These should subsidize the current large scale mining of coal and uranium as source of energy. For effective implementation of the policy, the government should work in region correcting thematic environmental assessment (Bakker, 2004). This should be in effect to determining of the policy breakers and reporting them to the relevant authorities. There is a need for the government to involve international agencies like, UN that deal with global environment governance policy. International urgencies for environmental governance policy, ensures that the policy adopted by a given country are coherent with the set global environmental governance policies.

The government objects to achieve its goals by ensuring of national environmental laws and institutions are better developed, strengthened and complies with the current and environmental issues. Government is also working to facilitate the processes that enhance the change of environment for sustainability and reduction of environmental pollution (Steiner & Oviir, 2010). This is made effective by supporting environmental teams like UNEP with relevant information and employing technical expertise in the energy mining industries.

The government also keeps on updating on the reviewed global environmental report outlook in order to recover and improve the affected environment areas. Implications beyond the Policy The environmental governance policy affects a large scope that includes political ecology, government, and civil society as well as business. Australia relies on uranium and coal as a major source of local energy and the most commodities for export. By following all the environmental governance policy, it means that the market will be affected adversely and this affects the whole economy of the Australia (McCarthy, 2004).

This means that Australia will lose its competitive value in the market. The policy also affects citizens. There are different classes of people who cannot afford to pay electrical bill in Australia, therefore this class of people can rely only on firewood for lighting and cooking. Regulation of cutting down trees makes life of this group of people uncomfortable. On the other hand, in implementing of the renewal energy policies, taxation will raise to around 40 percent. This will affect tax payers in a way that some cannot afford.

This policy also does not include deforestation programs, thus there is no good timing and this results in leaving old growth forest vulnerable. The expense that will be used in reduction of coal effect and the high demand for coal-fire power by the residents is not stated. Therefore this can affect deprive the economy of the Australia (chris, 2010). The policy failure to address on the on the effect of climate change caused by burning of coal that is exported from Australia change leaves a dangerous gap.

Read More