This Changes Everything vs Odds Against Tomorrow - Essay Example

Introduction Klein in a brilliant way unpicks the climate chaos, which is too complex. Klein attempted todestroy the myth of austerity and extraction, terming it as poisoning and poverty.She created an image to show that climate change can create several jobs, build a society and a source of hope when hope seems to be a rare commodity. She noted that capitalism, particularly the current passion of extractivist version, as the core driver of the climate change crisis. Klein based her argument that climate change should rally call around the globe that the alternative is built (Klein350). Richs novel, Odds againsttomorrow, attempts to trace the life of Mitchell Zukor. He was a young mathematician who had an obsession with predicting apocalyptic natural disasters. After completing college, he found himself as an employee of a secretinsurance firm in New York City. His job was to predict disaster calamities due to his ability to do so. Because of his ability of prediction, he is considered as a prophet in this world(Rich 3). The main focusing of this essay is to bring comparison-contrast that can ultimately work to highlight the better book of the two read for class. In addition, since this is a literature essay, it will argue about which work displays a greater degree of sophistication in the deployment of literary terms and techniques. The terms include theme, organization and (pathos, logos and ethos; these three terms are used at once because they are all used to persuade though in a different way). Therefore, the most appropriate way to show how these terms emerged in between the two books is by discussing its content to illustrate its use. It will be of great essence to define these terms that have been used in the two books. The definition of a theme is the main subject of writing, whereas, pathos; ethos and logos is a way of persuading although in a different way. Klein has attempted to take the reader deeply into the bottom heart of the movements all over the globe about those attempting to campaign for climate change, but they do very little.  She described movement that spreads with such speed through organizations and universities.  The author says that those movements missed the strength of strategic means: now and then professors, religious leaders and students, make the case for such divestiture.They chip away at the social licence with which these companies that cause climate change operate (Klein 396).  Furthermore, Klein gave an example of societies that attempts to mobilize its members’ to avoid extraction of oil, removal of top mountain and pipelines globally. Klein claimed; there ispeople who are just ordinary and are of all age brackets who attempt to stand up and put their bodies on the track to preserve carbon underground in order. The main idea behind all this is for protection of air, future and water. At this point, the author report demonstrates on blockades, resistance of politics and mountainsides. Klein attempts to persuade that there is no other potent arsenal in the battling against fossil fuels than the coming up of actual means (Klein 397).The author attempts to convince how the story about why fossil fuel companies are not good. Klein argues inline tothe classic rational deficit means, that is, if you offer people adequate for that is depressing; there are chance that you will get a response.  She further noted that an appeal to values is also very significant(Klein417). However, as you approach the book end, she attempted to compare between campaign that was against the slave trade and battling to save the climate as similar and very powerful.Slavery abolition is historic, and it took a very short time to change this activity around the world. She stayed put and stressed that change in climate is the time to push for everything that past movements have attempted to achieve and worked on. Klein made a very comparative argument of that of climate change justice, social justice and ecological justice. She said it was timely and urgently required. All this is very persuasive statements concerning the climate change. Odd against Tomorrow Nathaniel has turn around foreseeing of disaster and calamities into arts that are very high. Being set in a near-future New York City, the book followed the unusual career of futurist, and someone who was obsessed with mathematics, by the nameMitchell Zukor. Zukor lived during scenarios that were very disastrous. Surely, he had predicted this scenario to five hundred organizations that were very fortunate. In the due process, Zukor became a hero culture.(Rich).The Seattle destruction is where the novel began. This event appeared to be set at roughly the same time, and it has been hinted that Against the Odds is an alternate history where a natural disaster defines generation of Mitchells instead of terrorism act. They called them generation Seattle. Mitchells post-graduation provided a narration for substrate of the philosophy debates at the core part of the book. Their tender age became allegories for two ways we comprehend the future after enormous disasters. Mitchell relocated to the surreal New York offices of FutureWorld, a consulting firm that offered organization advice about preparing for disasters. Mitchell has devised every possible mean to tackle and prevent calamities. An odd is also a spot-on satiric nature of the future industry. It the novel, you would realize that FutureWorld take advantage of loopholes in the legal arena which was introduced in the wake of Seattles post-quake lawsuit hazardous situation. A bill has relieved corporations in New York City legal responsibilities for damages in the event of a calamity as long as they have retained the services of anorganization that offers them advises regarding their risks. That company is FutureWorld, and the intensely brilliant Mitchell became absurdly wealthy by telling organisations CEOs about cyber-terrorist in China(Rich17). Rich the novel, Odds against Tomorrow, was written before the occurrence of Sandy Hurricane and was obliged to revise it. Zukor showed knowledge of this event before it happened, and so well-observed, that the novel comes across more believable in the real-life storms aftermath.This novel provides remembrance that the final complete destruction of the world is more complicated than what we can think about. There is no feeling overwhelming happiness of universal ends of our messes, species, nor is there arecomplete tactics to survive on.Instead, there are several ways to meet death and survive.Most significantly, even the worse carnage has an aftermath. Its what you do with the remains that matters(Rich 2013). Conclusion In conclusion, the first author, Naomi Kleins has demonstrated how the terms have been employed throughout her book. The theme of her discussion is all about climate change, and this has come out very clearly. In addition, she has tried to demonstrate how it is significant to consider this issue of climate change. Further, she convinced on how some communities attempted to offer environmental protection as well as preserving for their future. Organization also comes in her discussion as it has been seen in her book. The second author, Nathaniel Rich, has demonstrated to have applied theme and organization in the novel. He talked about foretelling of events before they happened, and the foreteller became very rich by informing organisations CEOs about events that are to happen. However, Klein’s novel seems to be best in application of these terms, unlike the Rich novel. Works cited Klein, Naomi. This Changes Everything. New York: Simon and Schumester, 2014. 350-417.Print Rich, Nathaniel. Odds Against Tomorrow. St. Martins Press, 2013. 1-20.print Read More