Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1596304-global-warming
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1596304-global-warming.
Such has become advocacy for Intergovern¬mental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), World Meteorological Organisation (WMO), and the United Na¬tions Environment Programme (UNEP) since 1988 with civil society around the globe (IPCC, 2007). The issue deserved serious concern as global temperature increased from 3° to 5° C – and might reach 5.4° to 9° Fahrenheit in 2100. The sea level has also risen to 25 meters and is projected to reach 82” by the year 2100 (IPCC, 2007).
The rise of global temperatures brought along some drastic changes in land and oceans as thermal expansion in the ocean and the rapid melting of polar and Antarctic regions (IPCC, 2007; Craven, 2012). Ecologists likewise observed that precipitation patterns are changing with disaster’s increase in numbers and intensities. Experts posit that the erratic increase in frequency, duration, and intensity of climatic outbursts caused so much flooding, prolonged drought season, severe heat waves, and changes in weather patterns (IPCC, 2007; Craven, 2012). Global warming hurts agriculture too as yields became poor; more glacial retreats reduced the summer period; and brought about the extinction of some species (IPCC, 2007; Craven, 2012). Health experts also argued that global warming also espoused malaria and other diseases in areas where these have been quelled before (IPCC, 2007).
Global warming is a consequence of both manmade actions and astronomical developments influencing the earth’s surface (Craven, 2012). In the last decades, people have increasingly devastated ecology with pollution, logging, mining, and other resource-related extraction. This is further aggravated by the recent phenomenon when the sun reached its ripening period thus producing some C-flares, X-flares, and M-flares.
Craven (2012) called for people to adopt disaster risk management and strategies to mitigate the impact of global warming. Craven (2012) perceived that this is the sole alternative to ascertain sustainable development so as not to compromise the future of the succeeding generation. The researcher likewise contends that global institutions should start forecasting the worst impact of global changes to ascertain that strategic responses and actions could genuinely educate the people to proactively take measures for ecological rehabilitation (Craven, 2012). This calls for governments and institutions to shift on the developmental paradigms that put potential disaster as an integral part of the comprehensive plan to balance probabilities and consequences (Craven, 2012). This will hasten the adaption of economic models too to press on the need to regulate stringently the industries and companies with eco-friendly quality standards. Ecological protectionism should likewise be developed as a culture of every company while government should prioritize the formulation of policies for ecological protection in the name of sustainable development.