Disposal of Industrial Wastewater and Alternatives - Essay Example

Disposal of Industrial Wastewater and Alternatives Industrialization is an avenue that leads to development of a nation. However, it has detrimental effects to the society. Argument about the need to control industrial pollution especially the effects of industrial waste on water leads to the debate on industrialization. Development conscious people view the impact of industrialization in terms of economy without projecting the impact it has on the environment. On the contrary, it does not mean that the process of industrialization does not benefit the society, but a recipe of environmental problems. Many industries release their industrial effluent in the air, channel the industrial water into sewer lines, or may also fail to treat the industrial sewer water before releasing it to the public sewer plants. It is not surprising to meet industrial sewer water spilling on the surface. Notably, no one seems to see the impact that the industrial sewer water has to the society. Water serves the society in almost all aspects. Arguably, industrial functions, domestic functions, and environmental functions require water. This certainly means that all process in both environmental set up and industrial set up require water. It is right therefore to argue that water is the source of human livelihood. That well said, environmentalists argue in favor of processes or activities that preserve sources of water. Constant awareness creation has acted in the resent past as a tool that used by the environmentalists to enlighten the society about the consciousness in preserving nature. On the other hand, development conscious think tanks work proposals that aim at creating more opportunity that would lead to development. \ Industrialization and activities relating to it has often featured in their-ever-changing- development agenda. Industrialists site a number of reasons that support their course in the society. First, industrialization creates opportunities for the society such as employment. These opportunities promote the wellbeing of the society. Second, promoting industrialization ideology creates opportunity for trade among countries or states. Trade brings products to the proximity of the consumers. What would happen when there is no trade? Would people be able to get products they need in the society? Holding social fabrics together entails a number of factors, which must promote the existence of people. Do we argue that environment has limited opportunities to offer to humankind? Probably not, but exhausting the opportunities in the environment would create detrimental outcome to the society. Industrial effluent discharged in rivers or water channels limit the environmental opportunities we have. For instance, industrial waste released in water limit the use of water since it contaminates the water. What would be the view of industrialists to this situation? It is not bad, shrugs, and goes his way. Yes, it is not bad. Do you expect us to close down our industries? Of course not, but what do we do about it? Protecting water sources is the top agenda, yet they environmentalists pass laws, which allow industrial discharge into water sources. Chanting their views towards environmental preservation is not surprising to the ears of the public. Does the government know about it? What steps does the government take to avert the situation? “We must preserve our future” yet they pass laws to allow water from industries to flow freely into our rivers. This hypothetical statement does not observe its own content. Diseases such cancer, typhoid and diarrhea among other torment the society. For instance, how many people care to know the probably causes of cancer? Not even environmentalists site the effects of asbestos used by most industries. Asbestos has elements, which promote cancer. It means that industrial waste is a threat to health. Rainwater is essential for daily use in the society. Some people take rainwater without bothering. This trend hit a snag following the advent of industrialization. Purity of rainwater does not apply anymore (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency). Who bothers to know how much poisonous gases mix with rainwater? Statement such as we shall endeavor to recycle poisonous gases before releasing them to the atmosphere would be the case. The government promotes agricultures yet it is reluctant to protect water for agriculture. It is apparent that rainwater used for agricultural projects has industrial chemicals released in the air. Plants recycle these chemicals and eventually man consumes the effluents. This means that no one is sacred, not even the rich. Acting appropriately must be the song of the day. Not to the public, government, industrialists or whoever. This will not only save the society but would provide a measure that protects the future. It is consciously right, measurable, and holds the future of humanity. Part 2 Argument about industrialization renders the reader wondering whether preservation of water is important in terms of future generation. In the article, it is apparent that industrialization is a contributor to the livelihood of many people in the society. However, the article does not fail to address effects of industrial wastes into the environment. Largely, the article uses illustrations and examples to point the effects of industrial effluents to the future of the society. The examples provided in the article provide a backing to the argument. Convincing the reader to take a stand, on the need to devise ways of protecting water, when he sees the fruit of industries is a daunting task. In the article, the author uses rhetoric questions to point out the effects that industrial effluents have to the environment. The author of the article makes use of illustrative sentences to make his argument. The strategy behind this approach is to explore all necessary points to convince the reader that industrial pollution has an effect to the lives of the people. Arguably, vagueness or ambiguity in illustrations results from short sentences. The author does not want the reader to meet ambiguous sentences, but provide a solid backing to his argument. Killingsworth and Palmer in their article used long sentences to illustrate views that they intended the reader to understand. This strategy makes the reader to ponder about the argument and make judgment. The article has numerous questions, which the author does not bother to answer, but are left for the reader to make an informed opinion. Notably, the use of questions in illustrating a point provides the reader with an opportunity of submitting his views alongside the authors view. Actually, it has a lot of influence on the emotions of the reader. Good writing should evoke emotions of the reader. For instance, Killingsworth and Palmer, evoke the emotions of the reader in their article when they use quotes as illustrated in the following example “self-contained individual” offers an alternative view to the author’s view. In the same manner, Killingsworth and Palmer were able to influence the thinking of their readers by using phrases in quotes. Throughout the article, the author develops the two contrasting ideas by mentioning the importance of both sides. The strategy developed by the author leaves the reader wondering whether the author supports the argument. The significance of this technique is point the values of industrialization in the society and environmental protection on the other end. Arguably, water supports various functions in the society. However, the society cannot fail support its industrial plans in favor of water conservation. Probably, amicable approach that balances two contradicting issues was the intention of the author. The argument of the author portrays two perspectives: industrial perspective and deep ecology perspective. In industrial perspective, the author successfully illustrates the importance of industrialization. In the second perspective, the author successfully, addresses the importance of preserving sources of water. To illustrate his points he sites various reasons for water preservation. The reasons sited by the author gives the reader an opportunity to argue out his own independent views. In conclusion, argument on industrial pollution with a view to water pollution renders the reader with so many questions about what stand he or she should take. The author successfully, illustrates his argument stating various reasons, which backs his perspectives. The use of illustrative statements and questions is a stylistic devise developed by the author to evoke various reactions on the side of the reader. Arguably, polluting water through industrial revolution does not only lead to vulnerability of natures resources but creates long-term effects that would affect the society. However, industrialization creates opportunities in the society, thus changing lives. Work cited Industrial Pollution. Web 24 Feb 2012. http://www.rrcap.unep.org/reports/soe/sa_part2_3.pdf Killingsworth, M. Jimmie & Palmer, S. Jacqueline. Ecospeak. Rhetoric and Environmental Politics in America. Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press. 1992. Print. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Disposal of Industrial Wastewater and Alternatives. Web 24 Feb 2012. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=11622 Read More