StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Defective Premises Act 1972 - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Defective Premises Act 1972" states that Bert knew that there had been parties at the first flat previously where guests were not to get onto the roof, which Alice forgot to do. On the night of the party, Delia, one of the guests, was electrocuted when she tried to turn on the kitchen light…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.1% of users find it useful
Defective Premises Act 1972
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Defective Premises Act 1972"

The electrocution was caused by faulty wiring. Edward, also a guest at the party, thought it would be amusing to dance on the garage roof. As he could not reach the roof unaided, he decided to use a radiator under the window as a step. For some time, Alice had known that the radiator was loose. The radiator collapsed under Edward’s weight and he broke his leg in the fall.

Question
Advise Alice and Bert, who are both, being threatened with legal claims by Delia and Edward.
A Glance at the Circumstance

Based on the given situation, one could say that both, Bert (the landlord) and Alice (the tenant) had committed mistakes resulting in the injuries suffered by Delia and Edward. About Bert, he was the one who hired Charlie’s Electrics which presumably did not fix well the broken light switch in Alice’s kitchen as Delia was electrocuted due to faulty wiring. Alice on the other hand, is somehow guilty of what happened to Edward. Edward suffered a broken leg after he tried to go to the garage roof using the radiator under a window which Alice knew to be loose. If only Alice reported the loose radiator to Bert for him to fix it, the incident could have been avoided. As far as the circumstance is concerned, it seems that Bert and Alice have failed to perform their respective obligations as the owner and tenant of the place.

Analysis
According to Markesinis and Deakin (1999, p.69), the element of duty is associated with the following query: “Does the law recognize liability in the cited situation?” The essence of this question is related to the duty attached to a landlord as far as the given situation is concerned. Under section 4 of the Defective Premises Act 1972, the landlord is obliged to maintain or repair the premises under tenancy. He or she owes a duty to take reasonable care in all circumstances to all persons who can be affected by the defects of the premises (Defective Premises Act 1972). This is to say then that Bert, as the owner of the first floor flat which Alice rented, must make sure that nothing in the premises is defective that might cause any harm to any tenants. To take reasonable care would mean that Bert should have inspected Alice’s area to check if there was something defective and to fix it immediately. Since Bert did not know about the loose radiator, it can be presumed that he did not exercise reasonable care to maintain the place. To note, the tenant doesn't have to notify “the landlord of the want of repair” (Clements & Fairest, 1996, p.85).
Nonetheless, Bert could not be made liable for Edward’s injury because the ultimate fault is attached to Alice. As the occupier of the place, Alice has the responsibility to take care of the premises.

Taking care of the premises would mean that she should not do anything that could damage the property and if she does, she will be held liable for it. Section 1 of the Occupier’s Liability Act 1984 states that the occupier of a certain premises is obliged to take good care of the people who are in his or her premises especially if he or she knows of the possible danger his or her area might have. He or she has reasonable ground to believe that a person may go to the vicinity of the danger and that the corresponding risk necessitates some form of protection from the occupier. To note, Alice had known of the fact that the radiator was loose even before she conducted the party. Presumably, she had entertained the idea that one of the guests would use the loose radiator as she allowed them to get onto the garage roof which could only be reached through the high window of her toilet. In such a case, it is a contention that she is wholly liable for what happened to Edward.

About Delia’s case, it is clear that Charlie’s Electrics was at fault. It did not fix the broken light switch that resulted in what had happened to Delia. Nonetheless, as Bert and Alice are the only parties to the tenancy agreement, Delia could only sue any of them for damages. This rule is emphasized in the case of Cavalier v Pope [1906] AC 428 where the wife of a tenant was not allowed by the House of Lords to sue the landlord based on negligence as the tenancy agreement only involved the husband and the landlord (cited in Harpwood, 2008, p.224). Notably, Alice is already out of the liability issue since before the incident transpired, she had asked Bert to fix the broken switch. Even though Bert is not the ultimate cause of the incident, he is the one to be made liable for damages since he is the owner of the place. It is up to him to ask for indemnification from Charlie’s Electrics. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Question 1 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1420092-question
(Question 1 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1420092-question.
“Question 1 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1420092-question.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Defective Premises Act 1972

Professional Liability in Advising Others in the UK

The paper "Professional Liability in Advising Others in the UK" discusses such laws as the defective premises act, 1972, Health and Safety Works Act, 1974, Buildings Act, 1984, Land Charges Act 1925 of UK (LCA 1925), the Law of Property Act, 1925, Housing Act 1985, RICS (2006), RICS (2007), etc.... I have summarised my opinion on the following issues as under: Professional liability in advising others in the UK is impacted by the following laws, namely defective premises act, 1972, Health and Safety Works Act, 1974, Buildings Act, 1984, Land Charges Act 1925 of UK (LCA 1925), the Law of Property Act, 1925, Housing Act 1985, RICS (2006), RICS (2007), Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 Privity of Contract rule, Property Misdescriptions Act 1991 and Misrepresentation Act 1967....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Health and Safety of the UK Citizens

Already in place are UK's Torts Act 1977, laws on public nuisance, Public Health Act 1936, Defective Premises Act 1972, Fatal Accidents Act 1976, (Harpwood 2005,p.... The Defective Premises Act 1972 meanwhile, obligates anyone engaged in construction or repair work on land to exercise due care to remove any possibility of harming anyone including trespassers(Murphy 2007,p.... The paper "Health and Safety of the UK Citizens" discusses that the company is overwhelmingly guilty of negligence and failure to exercise due care under the UK Torts act, the law on nuisance, and the Occupiers Liability act 1984, and its warnings clearly lack compulsion....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Property Law and Basic Principle in Voluntary Dealings

I refined my search for UK journals in Lexis Nexis by using the search term “Section 4 of the Defective Premises Act 1972” and was able to find law updates detailing other cases of council housing where the provisions of Section 4 of the Defective Premises Act had been applied.... ii) Section 4 of the defective premises act of 1974 places an obligation upon a landlord to maintain or repair the premises being occupied by a tenant.... On the threat of proceedings under the defective premises act, the landlords carried out the repairs without cost to the laseholders....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

How a Landlord Can Protect His Rent Flow during the Property Cycle

The landlord will also not be able to recover any setting up costs that are above the normal costs of maintenance of the building (Defective Premises Act 1972).... efective premises act 1972 (c.... According to the tenant act of 1927 and the landlord and tenant act of 1988, the lease agreement can be done by absolute prohibition, qualified restriction and absolute qualified restriction.... In the case of Addiscombe Garden estates Ltd v Cramble (1957) in which a trustee of a tennis court took possession of the tennis courts and a club house under lease agreement needed a new lease based on the Landlord and Tenant act of 1954 act....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Law of Business Leases

XYZ ltd have an argument since the act further states that damage for the repairs will not be recovered in case of breach of the covenant to put the building in repair or leave the building in repair if it is shown that the premises however the state of repair they might be would shortly after the end of the lease for tenancy have been pulled down or undergo structural alterations that would render meaningless the importance or need to undertake the repair (Defective Premises Act 1972)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Term Paper

Construction Contract Law

Incidentally, Defective Premises Act 1972 may give relief to the claimant in such cases but on the ground of negligence.... As per the Housing, Construction and Regeneration act 1996, adjudication is dealt with as below.... While deciding the dispute, the adjudicator is expected to act impartially and he can assume authority to decide according to facts and law applicable to the dispute.... In other words the person or persons who are so closely and directly affected by the negligent act....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Housing and Welfare - Melford Housing Association

k, ‘Defective Premises Act 1972', 1972, http://www.... However, there is the defective premises act, Section 4 of which points out that the landlord has such responsibility to repair and maintain the property so that the tenants are reasonably safe from personal injury or from damage to their property caused by the defect.... t is this defective premises act that gives some possibility of compensation to Shazia in the present circumstances....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

Delay in Contract Execution and Professional Negligence under JCT 2011: An Analysis

n Harrison11 case, it was held that as per the section 1 of the Defective Premises Act 1972, a single duty is ushered on an architect that he should certify in a professional manner, whether proper materials have been used and whether the house is fit for the residential purpose when finished (Fletcher 2014 p.... elay due to “act of God” or “Force Majeure” which is not come under adverse weather conditions or under “Specified Perils” (Towey 2012)....
15 Pages (3750 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us