Is gambling a moral issue - Essay Example

Although some of these arguments may be correct, gambling is more of a moral issue because it results in people’s suffering while others thrive. According to Fitzgerald there is no point in considering gambling and casinos as an economically viable industry. No doubt it adds to the pocket of a few and also contributes to the governments revenue box, yet considering the social maladies casinos and gambling are responsible for; it is more of a curse than blessing. Furthermore a healthy society can thrive amidst healthy individuals.

Here health does not only refer to physical health but also the psychological one. Gambling results in erratic behavior through a complex neurochemical reaction that is far from being healthy and therefore according to Fitzgerald should be abstained from. Last but not the least the writer has also criticized gambling and casinos for spreading pollution and congestion in weekends through the rush of gamblers in peaceful localities where casinos are located. Fitzgerald states at first that gambling although illegal in the state of California, in recent time permission has been extended to some Indian tribes.

Might be placed in a light note but according to him since from historical times the Indians have been exploited by the other Americans the state now want to compensate them by conferring right of exploiting the others. United States of America as a uniform country must follow the same law for all and the logic that the writer has presented in legalizing gambling is no short of disgracing the goodwill of the government and the equality doctrine of the constitution. Without any grain of doubt the writer is against legalizing gambling but his arguments against such legalization are all driven on materialistic grounds.

Fitzgerald has referred that gambling can never be considered as an economic boost owing to the $2 net loss it imposes on the government for each dollar earned as revenue. Another economic argument placed by the writer is the doubling of bankruptcy rate in countries with casinos in compare to those without them. The writer carefully states statistics to act as a psychologist while judging the compulsion of a gambler to spend more than he can afford. The statistics according to Fitzgerald in favor of such compulsion is quite high at 43%.

Apart from economic and psychological reasons another aspect that Fitzgerald has referred to is the environmental aspect of gambling or casinos. The economic aspect that Fitzgerald has cited against gambling holds quite a ground. However quantifying the qualitative variables and indicators often stirs much debate. Owing to this fact it is hard to tell that whether the exact number that the writer has cited as a burden on revenue owing to gambling is appropriate. Another study amidst a different surrounding might have yielded a different result.

Furthermore the modern day economics is a social science and much more beyond monetary value exists in a society that economic consideration must take into account. The psychological cost that gambling imposes on an individual in terms of erratic behavior and addiction might well receive a counter attack from those who support gambling and considers it as a means to joy. Gambling is based upon probability and neither the cost of loosing nor the profit from winning is assured. A