Nobody downloaded yet

Analyzing the differing conceptions of separation of power held by Publius and Anti-Federalists - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Course 19 March 2011 Analyzing the Differing Conceptions of Separation of Power Held by Publius and Anti-Federalists The debate over the ratification of the Constitution of the United States, which took place in 1787-8, was one of important political processes of the early history of the USA…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.5% of users find it useful
Analyzing the differing conceptions of separation of power held by Publius and Anti-Federalists
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Analyzing the differing conceptions of separation of power held by Publius and Anti-Federalists"

Download file to see previous pages THE NECESSITY OF SEPARATION OF POWERS The idea of the necessity of limitation of powers within the framework of written Constitution was a basic premise shared by Federalists and Anti-Federalists alike. For instance, Cato argues that “a general presumption that rulers will govern well is not a sufficient security” (“Cato”), while Federalist James Madison observes that “the separate... exercise of the different powers of government... is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty” (“The Federalist No. 51”). At the same time, there existed views sceptical of universality of separation of powers. Centinel, an Anti-Federalist, considered the scheme of separation of state power into rival branches insufficient for the establishment of a truly democratic government (“Centinel”). In a sense, both Anti-Federalists and Federalists accepted the necessity of limitation of powers and of delineating the functions of different governmental bodies. Nevertheless, while Federalists ascribed higher qualities to the principle of separation of powers (“The Federalist No. 47”), the Anti-Federalists viewed it just as one of many, and not the most important, safeguards against the abuse of power. THE SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE CONSTITUTION According to the Federalists, the separation of powers was to be maintained through the relevant organization of the internal structure of the government. The Federalist authors were convinced that by enabling independent agency to each “department” of government while simultaneously restricting their ability to interfere in proceedings of the other branches, the institution of truly republican government was perfectly feasible (“The Federalist No. 51”). Accordingly, the Federalists objected to the idea of recurrence to the people in the event of conflicts between the branches, cautioning against the strengthening of the legislative power at the expense of the others (“The Federalist No. 49”). They found the independence of the judiciary especially important, warning against the possible encroachments by the legislature on the aforesaid independence (“The Federalist No. 78”). Anti-Federalists viewed the model of separation of powers established in the Constitution as abstract, pointing at excessive powers of the Executive and at the mixture of the executive and legislative branches of power found in the Senate (“Cato”). Both Cato and Centinel regarded the Senate as an aristocratic institution; whereas Cato proposed to institute direct election of the Senators and to establish annual rotation of its members (“Cato’), Centinel advocated the abolition of the Senate and the House of Representatives in favour of creating unitary federal legislature (“Centinel”). In short, the Federalists feared the possibility of “tyranny of majority” expressed through the legislative branch and maintained the necessity of curbing the excesses of popular majority (“The Federalist No. 10”, “The Federalist No. 49”). The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, thought that strong Presidency and non-elected Senate undermined the proper distribution of powers and advocated their reform (“Cato”) or abolition (“Centinel”). ALTERNATIVE MECHANISMS TO ASSURE THE APPROPRIATE CONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS Both Federalists and Anti-Federalists believed in the necessity of ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Analyzing the differing conceptions of separation of power held by Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Analyzing the Differing Conceptions of Separation of Power Held by Essay)
“Analyzing the Differing Conceptions of Separation of Power Held by Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Analyzing the differing conceptions of separation of power held by Publius and Anti-Federalists

The Anti-Federalists Objections to the Constitution

...The Anti-Federalists objections to the Constitution Those who sought the endorsement of the United States constitution between the year 1787 and 1788 referred to themselves as the “Federalists”. On the other hand, those who had various objections to the constitution were labeled as the Anti-federalists. The Anti-federalists had a variety of objections to the constitution. However, they were all united by their belief that liberty could only be secured in a small republic with limited powers in which the rulers were close to. The Anti-federalists believed that the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The Federalists Republic

...American Passages by Edward Ayers, Lewis Gould, David Oshinsky and Jean Soderlund Chapter 7: “The Federalists Republic, 1789-1799” Report Opposing Visions of America George Washington’s victory to presidency came after creation of the new constitution. Many Federalists disagreed with specific parts of the constitution and made arrangements to replace the Confederation. Conflicts that arose over policies, the varying interpretation of the constitution, and the competition that was present for power which led to the development of political parties. Political diversions emerged during Washington’s first administration, one of the sides choosing to favor commerce while the other...
5 Pages(1250 words)Book Report/Review

Federalists Paper

..., who contributed five Federalist Papers and James Madison, the Father of the United States Constitution and once elected as the 4th President of the United States of America, and authored the remaining twenty nine essays in which one of it thought to be initiated and originally proposed also by Alexander Hamilton. These three founding fathers of the United States Constitution use the pseudonym Publius in order for them not to hide their identity but to honor the name of the Roman consul Publius Valerius Publicola. The Revolution and Reconstruction of America and its Constitution are owed to several founding fathers of the United States of America which consists of statesmen,...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Fallacies of the Anti-Federalists

...counterpart. One of the assertions of the anti-Federalists was that a "very extensive territory cannot be governed on the principles of freedom, otherwise than by a confederation of republics, possessing all the powers of internal government, but united in the management of their general, and foreign concerns" (Address and Reasons). While the British Empire covered much of the globe, it was in the initial stages of yielding its holdings to independence. Imagine how difficult it would be for a government in our own time to micromanage the affairs of such a large country - as the Soviet Union found out. In the late 1700's, there were not that many areas of life over which the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Debate and Conflict Between Federalists and Anti Federalists

...” (“Objections”, 1788). The More Valid Argument The Anti-Federalists, as history has proven, had the strongest argument. Their principal misgiving of the Constitution entailed the loss of self-rule among the individual states, that the powers of federal government would eventually overwhelm the autonomy of the states. Specifically, two of the phrases describing the responsibilities of government, the ability to enact ‘all laws necessary’ and ‘promote the general welfare’ bothered the Anti-Federalists. They believed these clauses used separately or together were in opposition to the spirit of the Constitution and the uniquely...
9 Pages(2250 words)Coursework

Debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists

...Though the delegates at Philadelphia produced the Constitution, ratification was far from assured. While many saw the need for an organized, democratic national government, many people that remembered British tyranny were against the formation of such an institution. This led to the division into two separate groups in support of and opposed to the Constitution, known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, respectively. While each side had strong arguments to support their positions, the Anti-Federalists proved the most idealistic and democratic, though the leadership of the Federalists would prove too effective to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Can soft power prevent Anti-Americanism retaliation to the soft power of the United States which seems to be penetrating the societies of other countries so well. “To be sure, the deepest source of anti-Americanism is not US foreign or domestic policies, but the ubiquitous power of American culture, the power to penetrate by incantation the fabric of different societies across the globe. So while some anti-Americans may be reacting to George W. Bush’s policies in the Middle East, others resent its power “to occupy the minds of non-Americans peacefully and win their hearts”, as Ignacio Ramonet once put it.” (Opelz, 2007) It is this fact that makes us...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Federalists and Republicans

... Federalists and Republicans Introduction Originally, there existed only one party in America which was called the Federalists. This party was the only governing body in America. In 1793, another party emerged. The Republicans were also known as the Democratic-Republican Party. This party was formed as a result of Thomas Jefferson's resignation from the cabinet (Murrin and et al 56). His resignation was due to his opposition to the federalists’ policies which he insisted were based on corruption and oppression of the poor. The two parties had huge differences as far as domestic and foreign policies were concerned. The Federalists aimed at enriching the wealthy class in the community whereas... , The...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Separation of power in the UK

...Separation of power in UK The law refers to rules that control the About oxford dictionaries, law is described as “the system of rules that a precise country or society acknowledges as controlling the action of its citizens and that it may implement by imposition of penalties.” Law is almost everywhere and in everything: its application is relevant to corporate, marriages, states and people. The study of the law is basic for those fascinated with politics. With the law, there is a regulation of societies to avoid no equality and no equality. The cruise of this paper is to examine the separation powers in the UK. The principle of separation of...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Separation of Power in U.S. Government

..., that the concentration of all powers in a single pair of hands was not acceptable and could possibly lead to usurpation of power. Thus, the framers of the American Constitution began their work on this monumental document having regard to the above. In 1748, long before the United States of America gained independence in 1776, The Spirit of the Laws, a book written by the Baron de Montesquieu, laid down conditions of separate branches of power with different tasks and responsibilities (Vile, 1967). This doctrine was used by the framers of the American Constitution. In 1786 twelve states of the USA slated 74 delegates who had to participate in the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Analyzing the differing conceptions of separation of power held by Publius and Anti-Federalists for FREE!

Contact Us