Nobody downloaded yet

Analyzing the differing conceptions of separation of power held by Publius and Anti-Federalists - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Course 19 March 2011 Analyzing the Differing Conceptions of Separation of Power Held by Publius and Anti-Federalists The debate over the ratification of the Constitution of the United States, which took place in 1787-8, was one of important political processes of the early history of the USA…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.1% of users find it useful
Analyzing the differing conceptions of separation of power held by Publius and Anti-Federalists
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Analyzing the differing conceptions of separation of power held by Publius and Anti-Federalists"

Download file to see previous pages THE NECESSITY OF SEPARATION OF POWERS The idea of the necessity of limitation of powers within the framework of written Constitution was a basic premise shared by Federalists and Anti-Federalists alike. For instance, Cato argues that “a general presumption that rulers will govern well is not a sufficient security” (“Cato”), while Federalist James Madison observes that “the separate... exercise of the different powers of government... is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty” (“The Federalist No. 51”). At the same time, there existed views sceptical of universality of separation of powers. Centinel, an Anti-Federalist, considered the scheme of separation of state power into rival branches insufficient for the establishment of a truly democratic government (“Centinel”). In a sense, both Anti-Federalists and Federalists accepted the necessity of limitation of powers and of delineating the functions of different governmental bodies. Nevertheless, while Federalists ascribed higher qualities to the principle of separation of powers (“The Federalist No. 47”), the Anti-Federalists viewed it just as one of many, and not the most important, safeguards against the abuse of power. THE SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE CONSTITUTION According to the Federalists, the separation of powers was to be maintained through the relevant organization of the internal structure of the government. The Federalist authors were convinced that by enabling independent agency to each “department” of government while simultaneously restricting their ability to interfere in proceedings of the other branches, the institution of truly republican government was perfectly feasible (“The Federalist No. 51”). Accordingly, the Federalists objected to the idea of recurrence to the people in the event of conflicts between the branches, cautioning against the strengthening of the legislative power at the expense of the others (“The Federalist No. 49”). They found the independence of the judiciary especially important, warning against the possible encroachments by the legislature on the aforesaid independence (“The Federalist No. 78”). Anti-Federalists viewed the model of separation of powers established in the Constitution as abstract, pointing at excessive powers of the Executive and at the mixture of the executive and legislative branches of power found in the Senate (“Cato”). Both Cato and Centinel regarded the Senate as an aristocratic institution; whereas Cato proposed to institute direct election of the Senators and to establish annual rotation of its members (“Cato’), Centinel advocated the abolition of the Senate and the House of Representatives in favour of creating unitary federal legislature (“Centinel”). In short, the Federalists feared the possibility of “tyranny of majority” expressed through the legislative branch and maintained the necessity of curbing the excesses of popular majority (“The Federalist No. 10”, “The Federalist No. 49”). The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, thought that strong Presidency and non-elected Senate undermined the proper distribution of powers and advocated their reform (“Cato”) or abolition (“Centinel”). ALTERNATIVE MECHANISMS TO ASSURE THE APPROPRIATE CONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS Both Federalists and Anti-Federalists believed in the necessity of ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Analyzing the differing conceptions of separation of power held by Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1412634-analyzing-the-differing-conceptions-of-separation
(Analyzing the Differing Conceptions of Separation of Power Held by Essay)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1412634-analyzing-the-differing-conceptions-of-separation.
“Analyzing the Differing Conceptions of Separation of Power Held by Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1412634-analyzing-the-differing-conceptions-of-separation.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Federalists v. AntiFederalists
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
The Anti-Federalists Objections to the Constitution
...The Anti-Federalists objections to the Constitution Those who sought the endorsement of the United States constitution between the year 1787 and 1788 referred to themselves as the “Federalists”. On the other hand, those who had various objections to the constitution were labeled as the Anti-federalists. The Anti-federalists had a variety of objections to the constitution. However, they were all united by their belief that liberty could only be secured in a small republic with limited powers in which the rulers were close to. The Anti-federalists believed that the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Essential Question: Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal of the American Revolution Why or w
...stepped down after two terms and in this manner confirmed the point of reference that Washington had created — a point of reference finally made part of the Constitution by the 22nd Amendment in 1951 (Hughes 45). Despite the fact that elected term limits have been limited to the presidency, the anti-federalist were not convinced that the constitution was strong enough to guarantee equal leadership chance and term limits on other members of the legislative assembly. The fears of the anti-federalist like Jefferson opposed the election system and the federal government that gave much executive power to the president. As McDowell (103) asserted, ‘Jefferson thought...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Were the Anti-Federalists Correct Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal of the American Revolution
... gradually left, but after a period of continuous unrest that the continental army did not relent. Though the American nationalists and the radicals had come together in fight for independence and revolution, their original intentions caused a difference on their desires of what a central government constituted, and the ultimate effect was a concession of the federalist and the anti-federalist interests in the previous conventions. The earlier adopted article of confederation in the course of 1781had brought the states closer, through a national government that had been established to administer relation with the Amerindians residing off the states, regulate the interstate and foreign relations, and declare war. Contrary to the powers given... History...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists
...Though the delegates at Philadelphia produced the Constitution, ratification was far from assured. While many saw the need for an organized, democratic national government, many people that remembered British tyranny were against the formation of such an institution. This led to the division into two separate groups in support of and opposed to the Constitution, known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, respectively. While each side had strong arguments to support their positions, the Anti-Federalists proved the most idealistic and democratic, though the leadership of the Federalists would prove too effective to overcome. The formation of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists seemed inevitable from the inception of the Articles... to the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Fallacies of the Anti-Federalists
... of the assertions of the anti-Federalists was that a "very extensive territory cannot be governed on the principles of freedom, otherwise than by a confederation of republics, possessing all the powers of internal government, but united in the management of their general, and foreign concerns" (Address and Reasons). While the British Empire covered much of the globe, it was in the initial stages of yielding its holdings to independence. Imagine how difficult it would be for a government in our own time to micromanage the affairs of such a large country - as the Soviet Union found out. In the late 1700's, there were not that many areas of life over which the government held sway. The provision of roads and public order were just about all... ...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Analytical essay on debate and conflict between federalists and anti federalists
...misgiving of the Constitution entailed the loss of self-rule among the individual states, that the powers of federal government would eventually overwhelm the autonomy of the states. Specifically, two of the phrases describing the responsibilities of government, the ability to enact ‘all laws necessary’ and ‘promote the general welfare’ bothered the Anti-Federalists. They believed these clauses used separately or together were in opposition to the spirit of the Constitution and the uniquely American conception of freedom. Invoking either clause allows the federal government to expand its powers to the point of monarchism. Today, states are...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Separation of power in the UK
...Separation of power in UK The law refers to rules that control the About oxford dictionaries, law is described as “the system of rules that a precise country or society acknowledges as controlling the action of its citizens and that it may implement by imposition of penalties.” Law is almost everywhere and in everything: its application is relevant to corporate, marriages, states and people. The study of the law is basic for those fascinated with politics. With the law, there is a regulation of societies to avoid no equality and no equality. The cruise of this paper is to examine the separation powers in the UK. The principle of separation of...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Separation of Power in U.S. Government
..., that the concentration of all powers in a single pair of hands was not acceptable and could possibly lead to usurpation of power. Thus, the framers of the American Constitution began their work on this monumental document having regard to the above. In 1748, long before the United States of America gained independence in 1776, The Spirit of the Laws, a book written by the Baron de Montesquieu, laid down conditions of separate branches of power with different tasks and responsibilities (Vile, 1967). This doctrine was used by the framers of the American Constitution. In 1786 twelve states of the USA slated 74 delegates who had to participate in the creation of the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal of the American Revolution
...number: 1787 Constitution Was Not a Betrayal to the American Revolution One of the reasons why the Anti-Federalists claimed that the 1787 Constitution was a betrayal to the American Revolution is that, the constitution gave the national government similar authority to that which they had just fought against. To them, restoring the power to tax and regulate trade to a central government was building the same government as that of the Great Britain (Mooney 74). It is true that a central national government with the power to tax and regulate trade has the same system as that used by the British, but it does not mean that the American Revolution was betrayed. According to the events...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Analyzing the differing conceptions of separation of power held by Publius and Anti-Federalists for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us