Nobody downloaded yet

Senior Course Study: Philosophy of Language - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Philosophy of language Thesis: The rule-following problem is a deep philosophical problem. It raises questions about what meaning is and what language is. The rule-following problem may be referred to the problem of meaning underdetermination of an intentional phenomenon…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.4% of users find it useful
Senior Course Study: Philosophy of Language
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Senior Course Study: Philosophy of Language"

Download file to see previous pages Though Kripke’s ideas are often criticized for his skeptical approach to the rule-following paradox, there are followers of Kripke who consider him to be dominant over Wittgenstein for his attempt to solve this problem in such a way and not only theorizing, as it did Wittgenstein. Introduction to the philosophy of Wittgenstein Early Philosophy of Wittgenstein Wittgenstein is a great philosopher. He discusses the issues of self and meaning. He tries to draw parallels between the role meaning plays in the communication. He tries to see what language is and considers its structure. The studies of Wittgenstein present a perfect background for development of numerous philosophical ideas. Our discussion concerns his vision of language. In order to understand his paradox of rule following, it is relevant to trace tendencies of his development as a philosopher. Wittgenstein in his early philosophy developed ideas of Russell borrowed from Principia Mathematica and was focused on discussion of false or true propositions. Wittgenstein was focused on application of logic for semantics. He was inspired by Frege and Russell and their considerations about axiomization (Kaplan, 2006). In the course of his creative activity, Wittgenstein referred to symbolic depiction and mathematic language in order to show a factual basis of the language. An integration of different approaches to solving the problem of what logic is, what language is and how these issues are reflected in an individual, make Wittgenstein a great philosopher. In his early theory of language, Wittgenstein reflects his ideas about interrelatedness of things and words. Thus, “if the words in a factual proposition were not correlated with things, no sentence constructed out of them would say anything” (Stern, 2006). A correlation between things and words is the basis of communication. Therefore, Wittgenstein uses philosophy as a ‘tool’ in identification of the language function. From this claim it is seen that the philosopher considers correlation between separate things, thus he refers to the ideas of ‘atomism’ developed by Russell, i.e. in his early years Wittgenstein considered different phenomena separately, like ‘atoms’, and in his later years he considered different phenomena in relation to each other. Further on, Wittgenstein developed his ideas and made remarks to his Tractatus. Gradually, Wittgenstein started to step back from his version of ‘logical atomism’. Firstly, in Tractatus he claimed that “A proposition can determine only one place in logical space: nevertheless the whole of logical space must already be given with it” (Wittingstein1922, 3.42 cited by Stern, 2006). Consequently, Wittgenstein moved to holism (Crary and Read, 2000). Thus, he rejected the ideas of atomism taken from Russell. Wittgenstein widened his philosophical views and started to appeal for consideration of things in integration and interaction. Wittgenstein started to claim about a set of logical elementary proposition and considered the structure of the language, which “might be visible on its surface and might actually be gathered from the ordinary uses that we make of words in ordinary situations” (Wittgenstein, 1968). Consequently, Wittgenstein descended to his later philosophy. The later Wittgenstein is of great importance in the modern philosophical paradigm. In a modern context of world’ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Senior Course Study: Philosophy of Language Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Senior Course Study: Philosophy of Language Essay)
“Senior Course Study: Philosophy of Language Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Senior Philosophy Seminar
...?Senior Philosophy Seminar Study Guide Readings 24-28 Plato, Sextus Empericus, Descartes, Locke, Hume Plato Explain the twice bisected line, and each of the four divisions. If a line is bisected twice into unequal parts and then divided again in the same proportion, assume the two primary lines are answers. The two primary lines would be AC and CE. The four lines are AB, AC, CD, and CE for discussion purposes. AC is the visible world, while CE is the intelligible world. AB is shadows and reflections, or illusions. BC is physical things, or beliefs. CD is mathematical reasoning, whereas CE is philosophical reasoning. Plato believed that the knowledge represented by these lines are ordered...
12 Pages(3000 words)Assignment
Senior Philosophy Essays for Language Philosophy and Social/Political Philosophy
...? Wittgenstein held that most if not all philosophical problems are caused by sloppy reasoning, inaccurate use of language or asking absurd or meaningless questions. “Philosophical theories, he suggests, are attempts to answer questions that are not really questions at all (they are nonsense), or to solve problems that are not really problems” (Richter, 2004). It is key to note that, when Wittgenstein suggests in Proposition 4.003 of the Tractatus that “Most of the propositions and questions of philosophers arise from our failure to understand the logic of our language. (They belong to the same class as the question whether the good is more or less identical than the beautiful.) And it is not surprising that the deepest problems... are in...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Senior Course Study: Political Philosophy the principle that could each have two different meanings. What follows is his thinking about these four systems. It’s why he chose the particular interpretation of his second principle that he did. The system closest to a version of libertarianism like Nozick’s, the System of Natural Liberty, is consistent but wrong. It does nothing to correct or compensate for what Rawls regards as morally arbitrary influences on the distribution of goods. These influences are social or natural and the idea is that it’s unfair for your course in life to be determined by your family’s social class or your natural abilities. Two of the systems make partial attempts to deal with the problem of morally arbitrary influences, Liberal...
14 Pages(3500 words)Essay
Philosophy of Language Senior Course Paper
...? Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of language: Plus or Quus? of Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Language: Plus or Quus? It is easy to dismiss something which one makes no effort to understand. The purpose of what follows is to advocate the significance of a simple yet misunderstood concept in the philosophy of language, namely, “meaning.” One of the major topics that undermine the concept of “meaning” can be seen manifested in the rule following problem. Thus, this paper will address Ludwig Wittgenstein and Saul Kripke’s interpretation of the rule-following problem. Furthermore, this paper will focus on the possibility of establishing...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay
Senior Philosophy : EXAM 2 Study Guide
...?Henry Nabea # Philosophy # 10 May, Exam Two Study Guide Quiz Answer. In his book, Concept of Mind, Gilbert Ryle is willing to say that minds exist but he is unwilling to say that minds and bodies both exist. The reason he adduces to support his view is that minds and bodies belong to different categories and, therefore, it is a categorical mistake to lamp the two together as if they belonged to the same category (Ryle, 12). The mind belongs to the logical category while the body belongs to the physical category, this means that the two cannot, logically, be said to exist together. By logical tones of voice Ryle means the different ways of understanding the two different realities in the physical category...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Senior Philosophy EXAM 3 Study Guide
...?Henry Nabea # Philosophy # 16/05 Answers to Exam 3 Study Guide Questions Epicurus, in his hedonistic Philosophy, gives those who are worried about death a reason why they should not be worried at all about death. Epicurus argued that all good and evil consist in sensations. But death is the deprivation of sensation. This therefore means that death is nothing, since it is neither good nor evil because it takes human sensations which are the determinants of good and evil. Epicurus went on to argue that we should never fear death because in life death is not with us, and when we die we will be no more. Hence, Epicurus concluded that we should not live in fear of death (Epicurus, 510). 2....
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Language Processing Course Work
...that there will be identification of body language and facial expressions as a way of learning to associate word form through lip reading. The relevance of this relation is that when patients cannot rightly make meanings from the body and face, they are much likely not to be successful with lip reading (Anderson, 1989). Meanwhile for KW, lip reading activity would help as a way of visualizing words that are spoken. The use of practice rephrasing is also going to be very common in the therapy. This is because practice rephrasing will ensure that there is adequate time in the processing of what people say. This way, enough practicing and exercising on abstract sources of knowledge can be guaranteed in the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Coursework
Senior Philosophy
...Senior philosophy Test Question Aristotle begins by investigating the fundamental purpose of humanity. In doing this, the renowned scholar determines that happiness is not just a feeling or a sensation. According to him, happiness is the ultimate goal of human existence. In his investigation of happiness, he seeks to determine the nature of happiness and its role in the life of an individual. He discovers that happiness is fundamental in the life of every human. Unlike the most prevalent definition of happiness, that attributes happiness to either a feeling or sensation, Aristotle determines that happiness is a prerogative for a successful and fulfilling life. According to him, happiness is a relative...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Philosophy of Language
...Gottlob Frege (1848-1925), who was among the founders of the so-called analytical movement within the Anglo-American philosophy, is known today as one of the most outstanding philosophers in terms of his influence on the philosophy of the twentieth century. While Freges main sphere of interest was related to the basics of mathematics, his mathematical studies as well greatly contributed to the development of the modern symbolic logic. At the same time, in his works Frege was also touching upon themes related to the analysis of the semantics of language, i.e. the study of meaning conveyed with its help. And it was in this aspect of his scholarly activity...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Language teaching course
...Learning an unknown language At the beginning of my I took part in a 15-minute-lesson learning a language that I, as well as the rest of the class, was unfamiliar with. As soon as the teacher started speaking this language my attention was immediately drawn to it. As the teacher would not use English, my classmates and I became more intrigued and wished to know more about this foreign language. In retrospect, I think my one of the goals of any teacher is to draw the attention of their students and one way to do that is by exposing them to a new situation that will make them want to try hard and deal with this new situation. Language learning has a little...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Senior Course Study: Philosophy of Language for FREE!
Contact Us