Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1407796-examining-alternatives-to-globalization
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1407796-examining-alternatives-to-globalization.
In this regard, most of the anti-globalization proponents establish certain degree of advocacy with relevant reforms that are capable of acquiring remedies for the aforementioned concerns. They agree on allowing the developing countries to gain free access to the industrialized agricultural markets under protection and to other consumer products and technologies that have typically become less affordable due to enhanced global competitions. Hence, the opponents of globalization tend to express contention against tight restrictions imposed upon intellectual property rights by trade agreement or global agreement on investment (Ehrke).
Instead of granting WTO further liberalization, globalization opponents approve of realizing potentials through incorporation of democratic measures and control to be set up with social and environmental standards (Ehrke). This way, though most politicians or economists take the opposite perspective, the terms of globalization may be adjusted accordingly to meet the demands and interests of the greater majority whereas provision for debt relief (Ehrke) may be foreseen to enable developing countries to catch up on reviving the economy which consequently finds its way to treat poverty and hunger since there would be sufficient allocation to sustain the latter.
Open markets may also constitute more flexible options to trade and when coupled with legalization of a democratic approach, an increased level of freedom to expose new knowledge and possibilities of exploring avenues of industrial and economic growth for all nations involved. Consumers who are unable to afford certain commodities due to irrationally strict policies that prevent some appropriate balance in the flow and distribution of goods, both internationally and locally, are very susceptible to experience inadequacy of nutrition leading to poor health.
This vivid reflection of poverty eventually gives encouragement to the idea of immigration especially by the citizens of the third world countries. Consumerism, immigration, and nutrition thus at a point, are naturally placed in a cause-and-effect relationship. The most compelling perspective in the critique is the concern manifested by the opponents of globalization with how reforms bear impact on consumerism primarily. With the liberty to have the secured markets available for the multitude of consumers around the world, such move entails higher probability of choosing from product alternatives with larger range of values or modifiable costs that could raise affordability levels for the general mass particularly the one within the marginalized sectors.
One would essentially notice the humanitarian side of the advocacy in this respect while anti-globalization supporters also find a great deal of favor at intensifying attention on properly regulating international financial systems as applied through improved monitoring or supervision of banks, stock markets, as well as the system of taxation (Ehrke). Moreover, because globalization varies directly with the generation of issues that burden the environment with risks or factors correspondingly affecting human health and the
...Download file to see next pages Read More