Peer review form - Assignment Example

Peer Review What do think is the thesis for this paper and what does it tell you about the paper? Is it a strong, effective statement, why or why not? Does the paper follow the direction of the thesis, why or why not? In this paper, the thesis statement is that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s decision to portray animals as per their appearance serves the purpose of connecting the readers with the story in The Adventure of the Speckled Band. This thesis explains that the paper focuses on the impact of the using animals in the story.

However, the thesis statement is not strong because it lacks clarity especially on the last sentence of the introduction part. Nonetheless, the paper does follow the direction of the thesis because the following paragraphs are related to the thesis. 2. Comment on the introduction. What strategies is the writer using to hook the reader and set up the paper? Are they effective? What suggestions do you have? The first part of the introduction is well crafted because it starts by introducing the paper.

The writer uses suspense to hook the reader up, and this is effective. For instance, in the introduction, the writer avoids availing all the information about the story which compels the reader to read the other parts. Thus, they are effective, and almost require no suggestion.3. How does the writer use textual evidence and analysis to back up his or her claim? Comment on several examples and offer any suggestions that you have. Do you think that the writer “digs deeply” into the text (vertical thinking)?

Why or why not? What are some of the implications that the writer draws from the examples? In a bid to back up claims, the writer quotes from the story. For instance, to show the relationship between animals and danger, the writer states that the doctor kept two animals: a cheetah and a baboon. Another entails the snake which is portrayed as sharing similar traits with one Roylott because of the ruthlessness demonstrated. The suggestion is that author ought to have indicated the page numbers where direct quotations were used.

The writer had dug deeply and this is confirmed by the implications such as humans resembling humans in terms of characteristics.4. Comment on the organization of the paper. Is it logical and clear, why or why not? Is each paragraph unified around one main idea, indicated by a topic sentence? Note any issues that you see concerning paragraph unity, general organization or awkward transitions? Offer suggestion where appropriate. Notwithstanding the use of examples, the paper’s organization is poor.

Whereas the overall message is clear and logical paragraphs are poorly arranged. For instance, there is no indication of a topical sentence. Besides, there is also a lack of proper transition as evidenced on the second and the last paragraphs. Each sentence ought to revolve around one idea coupled with evidence for the topic. Also, there has to be a connection between the paragraphs. 5. Discuss the style of the paper – is there any unevenness in the writer’s prose. For example, does the paper become too conversational for an academic analysis paper?

Provide examples. Clearly, the paper lacks evenness in the prose as it sounds ore conversational than academic. This is confirmed by the choice of words as well as the tendency to lack analytical evidence on the paper.6. Do you have any other suggestions for the writer? It is vitally important for every paper to show the source of information. That is to say, citation is needed whenever using another person’s idea or work.