My main goal is to request you to support Relief of J.D.S. by the Agency for Persons with Disabilities Bill Number SB 24. As we all know, this bill is a bout the relief of J.D.S., a disabled helpless lady who…
Download file to see previous pages...
The agonies of J.D.S. were caused by the negligence of the Department of Children and Family Affairs. So, as its successor, the Agency for Person’s with Disabilities should be held responsible for the negligence.
As a concerned citizen, I am committed to the protection of the rights of the disabled in the society. Therefore, I support this bill because it will make a big contribution towards the protection of the rights of the disabled who have not been treated with the dignity they deserve. Meaning, it will be useful in enforcing clause 393.13 of the Florida Statute and the Bill of Rights of Persons with Developmental Disability. These will help in preventing the disabled from being denied right to privacy, dignity. It will also grant them freedom from neglect, sexual abuse and exploitation. At the same time, it will put Agency for Person’s with Disabilities to be responsible and actively involved in monitoring the activities of home cares.
Those who oppose this bill argue that it is not a good one at this point of time. They argue that it is illogical to blame Agency for Person’s with Disabilities f the actions of Philip Strong. They are convinced that J.D.S’s case should not be special because it is just like any other rape. Therefore, no such attention should be given to it. However, I disagree with them because I feel that the disabled need protection1. This is supported by Reed who, in ‘The Rome I Regulation and Reapprochement of Anglo-American Choice of Law in Contract: A Heralded Triumph of Pragmatism over Theory,’ argues that indeed, the disabled are much vulnerable individuals who need special attention2. Similar sentiments are echoed by Mirrow who, in the article ‘The Social-Obligation Norm of Property: Duguit, Hayem, and Others,’ holds the view that clause 393.13 of the Florida Statute is under threat and needs to be salvaged through stringent
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
“Social stratification”, Macionis observes, “is a system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy.” (2008, p.254) Ethno-racial background, religion and socioeconomic position include the most dominant indicators of social stratification.
What is Social Class?
In all societies, material and symbolic rewards are distributed in unequal proportions and every society strives to find an answer to this unequal distribution of resources. Social Stratification is defined as systematic form of inequality.
I have been thinking about the assigned task for too long now, he seemed like a blessing in disguise to me. Therefore, I offered him the bench where I was sitting, This seemed like a good opportunity to strike a conversation with him. The purpose behind conducting his interview was to evaluate his socio economic status in his society by using social sciences survey method (Adle and Clark).
Social class also refers to a concept that centers on various models of social stratification where people are put together in groups of hierarchical categories of social standing with the main ones being lower, middle, and upper class. A social class refers to a set of persons who are in a similar position economically (Levine, 2010).
Social stratification is the feature of every society and not individuals. It depends mainly on three factors such as power, prestige and property. The social stratification is a universal factor but inconsistent, it prevails in the society from generations and the strata are formed due to the belief of the people.
Weber has given the three component theory of stratification based on class, status and party or politics. In this stratification class is an economical factor while status and politics are non economical factors. It includes the relationship between employer and employee, renter and owner and others.
apital owners and lower labor providers, Weber provides a detailed and a more complex perspective that explains social inequality using analytical processes. Reliance on forces of capitalism and modernity as the main drivers of social stratification enable Weber to approach the
tatus, then analyze how these two statuses become different from stratification of social, economic, class and caste, or how this stratification affect the build of status. This paper aims to find the difference between these two statuses when placed in the stratification
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Class Stratification and Work for FREE!