Freedom of speech should have a limitation or not - Essay Example

In modern age of great communication, when the power of information increases from day to day, a government should have no control upon such a global historical process. To provide a limitation on freedom of speech in modern conditions would be both despotic and unnatural decision. Freedom of speech takes its origin from human nature. Humans are social beings and used to share information since time out of mind. Was it a warring call about a danger, or a process of expression own thoughts and feelings, but humankind learned to speak, invented languages, arts and signs, - all with the same goal, to convey information to others.

There was and is, and will be a human desire and need to speak freely to other humans. Humankind already has spent millenniums developing a wider system of communication, from sending a messenger to sending a digital message in any part of the world, and when taking a look on a global modern trend, the sphere of communication only increases its development. Apparently, knowing this human natural need of communication and to prevent the injustice of previous years, in 1948 the right of a free speech was recognized on a law level within Article 19 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed by General Assembly of United Nations.

“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers” (The Universal Declaration of Human Rights). The Declaration proclaims universal laws and rights for every human being, despite a race, religious and other differences, and nowadays it serves as a basic for every constitution of United Nations country members. Therefore, despite a particular state may specify own laws and rights on freedom of speech, they should correspond to ones