Little Red Riding Hood - Assignment Example

Comparing and contrasting two versions of “Little Red Riding Hood” Despite the slight similarities in the traditional and modern version of the story “Little Red Riding Hood”, the two tales differ significantly. In both versions, the girl is denoted as a beautiful creature, lives in a village in the outskirts of the town and both versions illustrate the grandmother living in the forest. Similarly, the characters mentioned are grandmother, little girl, wolf and mother. However, there are various differences in the two versions.

In the traditional version of the tale, the girl finds herself in the forest after being sent by her mother to take cakes to her ailing grandmother. In the modern version, the girl finds herself in the woodland after sneaking from her grandmother’s cottage to taste strange fruits and wild berries. The girl in the traditional version of the story appears to experience anxiety after meeting the wolf, but sojourns on to reveal her identity and whereabouts of her grandmother, an action that later costs her dearly while in the modern version, the girl spots the wolf, instantaneously falls in love with him and runs to catch it just to spend jiffies together.

Whereas in the traditional version it is the girl who admires the beauty of the imposed grandmother, in the other version it is the wolf that admires the physique of the girl. Unlike in the traditional version, the modern tale allows the grandmother and the girl to live after meeting the wolf; the girl enjoys life with the wolf, giving birth to Leroi, the first Loup. Noteworthy, a clear analysis and interpretation of the two stories indicate that the stories are the same. The main character remains the same.

The aforementioned differences arise due to changes in time, culture and geographical location of the writers. The events have been slightly altered to suit or portray the differences in cultures, landscape, and time and the need to make it easy and relaxing for the audience to relate it to their real experiences. The second version seems to have been developed from the first version. Apparently, I used context, flow of events, and themes to establish the level of difference and sameness in the two versions of the story.

The context of the story remains same; an untarnished consideration of the stories designate that the forest and village are an imperative setting. I further considered how the story unveils, for instance, how the girl meets the wolf and how the end is designed. Additionally, I considered the themes of disclosure of identity and the girl’s growth to adulthood. Therefore, using framework, flow of events, and presented themes reveals various differences and similarities between the traditional and modern version of the story.

Ostensibly, the process of comparing and contrasting the two stories led to the realization that the stories are reasonably similar and the changes therein are steered by cultural and environmental differences. Judging from the similarities and perceived differences, the stories warn against revelation of identity and insensitive interaction with strangers. The slight variances do not perplex the meaning hence there is every reason to believe that the one story is an advanced version of the other.