Download file to see previous pages...
In my opinion, higher education is never a right, but a privilege for every interested citizen to utilize. It is an opening advanced to the citizens to make use of at their will. Remember it is never unavoidable.
To say that higher education is a right is to assert that everyone, even those who have no interest in it whatever must have it. It also means that the government must provide it to all citizens at no cost. It is worthy to note, that the government must cater for all the advanced schooling costs. The government does not do that in the actual sense. In the community system, disabled students have a right to access proper education. Students with low incomes also have the right to get cheaper or free lunches in schools. It is impossible to compare higher schooling to the right of disabled students to access a proper education the community. You cannot, in a similar way compare higher education for citizens with low-income students receiving cheaper or free or lunch in schools.
Education is indeed something of merit, and it is essential for progress in the society. It is because an educated people are required to maintain a proper democracy. This does not qualify education to be a right. A right is usually sponsored fully and defended by the government as it is meant for the interest of a special group of people. It is worth noting that the right to public education was endorsed and is supported by legislation. It is given freely to all citizens. Nevertheless, students are not forced to take this path. They may opt for other ways. Some may go to private schools that are not usually government sponsored.
The reason people need college education is to have them competent enough to meet the standards and demands of the job/ employment market. It is obvious that a more learned person has more skills and competence to execute workplace duties upon training. Most employers prefer those with higher learning because they
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The move to call for a ban on credit cards for students is a welcome to me concerning cautioning them about the dangers involved. This is in light of recent events where students are getting themselves in debt at a significantly young age, while they cannot make enough to pay for the said credit cards.
This paper will attempt to provide a logically sound argument based on various ethical, legal and organizational theories, which will negate the delusion of employee rights to privacy while performing their jobs. Along with these, some managerial implications will also be discussed.
While many people including sociologists believe that grave offences such as murder need to be punished with death penalty, others uphold the view that awarding the capital punishment is against the laws of nature and instead advocate imprisonment for offenders.
The claims are strongly supported by warrants, grounds and backings. The warrants, ground, backings of the formal article’s discrimination discussion firmly supports the claims. Thesis Statement The article’s thesis is: The article’s discrimination discussion’s claims, warrants, grounds and formal language have both strengths and weaknesses.
According to their argument, the minority groups are sidelined in terms of accessing higher education. In terms of progressive development, gaps are still noticeable in respect of education accessed by the males and females. In this regard, it seems the girl child still lag behind when considering right to education for all.
Violence amongst young people, it is claimed, is becoming increasingly common and hip-hop is partly to blame. However, not everyone sees it quite like that. Despite its negative press, hip-hop has also been seen as a
In his essay on this fascinating topic, Highlet shows himself to be a true believer. He describes his own relationship with Zen and shows why he thinks Zen can be more than a philosophy.
One of Highlet’s main arguments in his essay is the
Federalism refers to a scenario where partial self governing states operate under a central regime. At this level, the federates and the central government have powers that are dictated by law, and cannot be negated or ignored by either party. Anti-federalism refers to a
The unjust decision will also be a bad decision, and will deprive Socrates life of value.
Firstly, Socrates asks and Crito confirms that unjust thing is unjust under any circumstances, even when responding on injustice. Then, Socrates
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Argument for FREE!