Literary Sources in Nuclear Weapons - Annotated Bibliography Example

He goes on to express his discontent with the increasing spirit of war that is reflected in emerging nuclear weapons technology alongside expanding government expenditure on the military. Most countries offer skewed information to the public to seek their approval on nuclear use and this manipulation is what Wilson rejects. The ideas of the author are relevant to the contemporary global political debate that strives to shun nuclear weapons. However, the author fails to mention the technological pressure that encompasses nuclear energy as more sustainable which is difficult to alienate from a desire to make weapons.

Bernstein is concerned about the level of ignorance across the world on critical aspects of nuclear weapons. He makes efforts through intensive and extensive research findings to explain the role of society in addressing the issue of nuclear weapons. According to this author, most developed economies are bent on investing in nuclear technology or sustainable energy and weapons of mass destruction. There is significant ethical concern derived from this technology. According to Bernstein, the public need to be informed about the dangers of nuclear weapons in the environment and the biological processes of living organisms including man. This information would offer a convincing perspective of nuclear weapons to the public who has the final say through the political process to pass nuclear weapon bills and subsequent financing through taxes. The opinion of Bernstein is relevant to the question under discussion since it addresses the centrality of a nuclear weapon in diplomatic relations among countries besides health and environment-related risks.

Krieger offers the other side of the nuclear technology argument. In his opinion, existing socio-economic and political events justifies nuclear weapons. However, he cautions against failure to establish and adhere to the legal framework that would guard the society against this weapon of mass destruction. The author overwhelmingly criticizes the wrong notion that nuclear weapons would address external aggression as pure psychological manipulation. In essence, the threat of nuclear weapon is real and unless diplomatic laws associated with this issue is addressed through the stringent international community; the world is on the brink of war (Krieger, 63). The author points out the existing socio-economic and political deterrence toward controlling the creation of nuclear weapons. Weak international laws and numerous legal loopholes that include hiding under nuclear energy are attributed to limited possibilities of stopping nuclear weapon development. This work is significantly relevant to the raging debate over the abolition of nuclear weapons that has led to a strained relationship among countries and consistently heightened suspicion. The author only fails to note the complex international socio-economic and political diversity among states which make it difficult to curb the problem. The overall idea of Krieger is an integral part of the globalization of politics and diplomatic relationship reforms campaign.