The World Monuments Fund - Essay Example

WMF hoped that the result of the forum would reach as many scholars as possible especially on issues regarding planning as well as conservation projects. The discussions held helped students in acquiring opportunities of learning about and be able to contribute to the knowledge as well as appreciate the ancient Roman society. Additionally, the discussion also presented the individuals with a unique opportunity to compare as well as exchange experiences, views, and ideas concerning best practices. More importantly, the discussion aimed at suggesting ideas that would contribute towards the chief goal of preserving the archaeological sites ((Pompei et al. 7-8). Recently, more conservational work has been carried out by the Instituto Centrale per il Restaurant and other numerous local institutions with help from other foreign organizations. Many of these institutions attended the symposium. In this region, much work under historical and scientific fields has been executed with the main goal of preserving the remains of the Romans.

Some of the remains range from tombs to entire insulae and represent Roman history dating back to the first century AD. The efforts of the WMF were brought to Pompeii when the region was listed among the most 100 endangered sites. According to the WMF, the symposium presented an opportunity that would help in the re-definition of the best conservation techniques that would be used both in the contemporary world and in the future. Although the discussion came across numerous disagreements, there were several ideas on which individuals agreed on. For instance, most archaeologists maintained that while implementing any effort in preservation, a door should always be left open for future archaeologists (Pompei et al. 21). Another disagreement came up about the reconstruction of the sites. Most argued that the sites would lose their texture once reconstructed. Tourism was also put in the limelight as a major problem towards conservation efforts. It was argued that if 10,000 tourists walk through the site in a day, wear and tear would be considerably high; therefore, some areas had to remove-limit.

From a personal view, I think that most of the arguments presented are valid and applicable. First ancient Roman history is one of the areas that could disappear if not preserved. The symposium was in line when it decided to include the Roman sites since it is one of the richest cultures and its past must be preserved. About the discussions, although there were various disagreements, to me, the individuals came up with good solutions as to how to manage and preserve the sites (Pompei et al. 35-37). The discussions also helped in pinpointing the main reasons why it would be difficult to preserve the sites. Such reasons include tourism. While some thought that it would be of importance to reconstruct the sites, they might change with regard tabouleh want to see the ancient sites and not a representation of the same. The other idea that I found interesting is that concerning future archaeologists. It was agreed that an opportunity should be left for future efforts since the future might bring better ideas that could preserve the sites in a better way.