Comparison/contrast - Essay Example

Rather than comparing two points of view in deciding which one holds more strength, the preceding analysis will attempt to analyze the means by whichto authors compare and contrast with regards to how they present their subject matter. As a function of this, this brief analysis will focus its energy upon comparing and contrasting Williams’ “hyphenated American” and Julianne Malveaux “still hyphenated American”. It is a hope of this author that by drawing a level of inference based upon the means by which these two authors present their views, the reader can come to a better understanding of why the subject matter is so contentious, why such divergent views exist, as well as integrate a more thorough and thoughtful approach to the topic themselves.

Firstly, with regards to Williams’ piece, the author echoes many of Theodore Roosevelt’s qualms and misgivings with regards to the way in which individuals seek to portray themselves as a type of hyphenated American. It is the authors ultimate goal an opinion to present the subject matter in a way that the reader is convinced that harmony, social cohesion, and the future of the nation depends upon the level and extent to which this practice is furthered in the future. A notable difference between Williams’ essay and Malveaux is the fact that Williams does not go into any great deal of depth with regards to any specific examples.

Although this does not necessarily weaken Williams claim, the absence of concrete examples with regards to the subject matter that he is presenting and arguing against weeds the reader to question the overall veracity of his statements.Conversely, with regards to Malveaux, the reader is continually given evidence, reinforcement, and integration with past occurrences, history, and the realities of the present as a means of building a more effective argument. Although one might be tempted to say that this demonstrates that Malveaux’s argument is more effective, this is likely merely the result of the fact that Malveaux has had the luxury of ruminating upon Williams’ response prior to proffering her own (Sengupta 9).

Moreover, Malveaux approaches the issue from a much more personal stance; this is likely due to the fact that Malveaux takes a special interest in issues relating to African-Americans, economics, and society. In this way, the subject matter is perhaps more infused by pathos as compared to Williams’ piece on the same subject matter.Ultimately, more than merely disagreeing on the subject matter at hand, these two authors approach the issues in mechanically diverse ways. This is likely result both of their stance on the subject matter, understanding of its complexity and depth, and personal biases as a result of their education and personal life experiences.

Oftentimes, it is necessary for the reader to understand such dynamics prior to placing a degree of understanding, analysis, or appreciation for the particular argument that is given. This is due to the fact that without understanding from which point of view the author is seeking to inform the reader with an based upon what biases they may have, it is often difficult to come to any type of informed and rational decision upon the subject matter and.Work CitedSengupta, Ashis. "The Hyphenated Identity In Contemporary Multiethnic American Drama.

" Americana: E-Journal Of American Studies In Hungary 4.1 (2008): 9. Academic Search Complete. Web. 9 Apr. 2013.