The dilemma with Americas financial cliff - Essay Example

The dilemma of global warming The Earth is undoubtedly warming up with the passage of time. There has been a noticeable increase in the temperature of the Earth over the last century (Nit, 2010). The prime cause of global warming is human beings’ dependence on fossil fuels, burning of coal, and emission of the greenhouse gases into the atmosphere from the industries, and vehicles etcetera. While global warming is caused primarily by the activities of the human beings, the animals and nature are suffering without any fault.

As a result of global warming, the polar caps have started to melt, the water level in the seas has risen, and the glaciers are melting. The polar bears in the arctic oceans are losing their natural habitat. A lot of species of animals have already become extinct because of their inability to survive in the climate as hot as it has got today. Besides, human beings themselves have been no less affected by the global warming. Melting of the ice caps would put a major portion of the land under water.

Results of the global warming have already started to show up in the form of frequent occurrence of earthquakes, cyclones, and floods. If human beings do not immediately stop the practices causing global warming, it might be too late to take any action few years later.There is no doubt that human beings are the prime cause of global warming, and that human activities have endangered the nature in many ways. However, if human beings stop such activities, it would be good for the planet but on the compromise upon the standard of living of the human beings.

In the present age, every country is striving hard to grow its gross domestic product (GDP), attain financial stability and advance its economy. These factors are very important particularly from the perspective of business. It would be very hard for the manufacturing companies to sustain if they reduce their carbon emission into the atmosphere or impose limits on its emission.Hence, global warming is essentially a dilemma. On one hand, economic growth happens but nature suffers. On the other hand, nature is protected by economic growth is hindered.

Solution with Immanuel Kant’s ethicsKant places emphasis on the will of an individual in a certain action rather than its consequences. Good will is the most important in Kant’s perspective. Following Kant’s ethics, the solution of the dilemma of global warming can be taking actions to protect the nature like growing trees while the practices causing global warming can be continued since the intention of human beings is to enhance the standard of living rather than destroying the nature.

Solution with Deontological ethics Deontological ethics asserts that human beings assume the responsibility to respect and protect others’ rights. Thus, human beings need to stop the practices causing global warming immediately because they are inhibiting the rights of the future generations as well as animals. The Right ApproachOf the two, Kant’s approach is better since it provides a way to improve the environment without necessitating a drastic change in the human lifestyle. Besides, global warming is a theory which might be wrong as well.

So stopping the practices causing global warming is too big a decision for a subjective matter like global warming. References:Nit. (2010, April 17). Global Warming a dilemma? Retrieved from http://www.jojojoson.com/global-warming-a-dilemma.html/.