Keystone Pipeline Issue on U.S. Economic and Environmental perspectives - Annotated Bibliography Example

Keystone Pipeline Issue on U.S. Economic and Environmental perspectives Bertrand, Pierre. Keystone Pipeline: 5 Things You Need to Know. International Business Times, January 19 2012. Web. 19, October, 2012. Keystone Pipeline has thrown ecologists against energy business enterprises for the past three years. According to Bertrand, President Barrack Obama was at par with ecologists in a controversial disagreement regarding the oil company. The primal issue addressed by the article is the asphalt sands and oil and energy self-reliance.

If the Keystone Pipeline is constructed, refineries from the United States will convert Canadian crude oil into gasoline and other fuels. This is because the pipeline will extend from Alberta Canada to the gulf of Mexico (Bertrand 2012). Blakey, Christina. Canadian Boom, Environmental Bust: The Tar Sands of Alberta. Political Science 335, Fall 2011, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo According to Blakey, the Keystone XL pipeline polarizes parties from either side of the construction conflict. The article states that, in a typical enmity between liberals and traditionalists, both parties face a deeper disadvantage in their argument.

If ecologists believe oil is not worth the jobs creation, then liberals will consider profit to be the prime key to the United States’ energy security (Blakey 335). Blanchard, James and Jacobson, David. Future of the Canada-United States Energy Relationship. 36 Canada-United States Literature Journal. 235 (2011-2012) Blanchard and Jacobson provide an ecological perception reflecting the provided carbon-concentration of tar-sands creation. Even though conservatives believe that that operation of the Alberta tar sands would merely come to a stop, demand for hydrocarbon-based energy is extremely high.

In addition, the journal says that the Ogallala aquifer is acutely sensitive, but its vulnerability is more valuable than the likely damage to British Columbia’s rain forest. The last leading problem discussed in the journal is the likelihood of the construction of the Northern Gateway. The Northern Gateway may be a fallback approach for the ecologists (Blanchard and Jacobson 2011). Daugherty, Deon. Texas GOP Senate candidates strike similar energy policy platforms. Houston Business Journal, July 13, 2012. Web. 19, October, 2012 Daugherty states that the president destroyed tens of thousands of employment opportunities when he denied Keystone the opportunity to build the Keystone XL pipeline.

Many of the jobs would have been provided in Houston, Texas. Further than that, the government’s decision to halt the pipeline is considered complete irrational. The article says that the Obama administration is illogic from an economic perspective. This is because of an overpowering goal of national security supposed to reduce the country’s reliance on foreign energy sources (Daugherty 2012). Hargreaves, Steve. Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected, for now. CNN Money, January 18, 2012. Web.

19, October, 2012. Hargreaves says that the Obama administration refused an offer to develop the contentious Keystone oil sands pipeline. The article says that the government defended its choice by saying that the deadline enforced by the congress did not leave adequate time to carry out the essential review. The pipeline might not be constructed yet but the corporation looks forward to expanding the pipeline. Conservatives dread the pipeline seeping out leading to the locking of the nation into an unclean type of crude.

In any case, such a situation might eventually finish up being sold abroad (Hargreaves 2012). Hoeven, John. Why we need the Keystone oil pipeline. CNN, February 24, 2012. Web. 19, October, 2012. According to Hoeven, the United States government introduced a new policy that transferred the project towards authorization and construction. This policy followed President Barrack Obama’s refusal of the previous month’s project. From an ecological perspective, the article says that the Keystone pipeline project has been under re-examination from September 2008, and the State department’s ecological review was finished in august 2011.

The review did not uncover any vital effects on a majority of sources that offered the ecological limitations (Hoeven 2012). Mufson, Steven. Keystone XL pipeline crosses political boundaries in Nebraska and beyond. Washington post, October 18, 2012. Web. 19, October, 2012. Canada declared that the seven billion dollar Keystone pipeline project would become certified for construction from Alberta to Houston. However, this statement was met with lots of conflicts from all over the country. The pipeline was planned to cross 92 miles of the state’s environmentally responsive sands hills and parts of the immense Ogallala Aquifer.

According to Mufson, political borders deteriorated as the pipeline proposal joined Nebraskans from party lines and split them from inside (Mufson 2012). The New York Times. Keystone XL Pipeline. The New York Times, October 18, 2012. Web. 19, October, 2012. One of the main controversies articulated by Keystone’s XL pipeline project is that a pipeline of this magnitude and capacity is merely too dangerous to operate. According to The New York Times, the Keystone XL pipeline project will hold a crude combination that consists of bitumen extracted from the oil sands of Alberta.

Conservatives movements have long challenged that oil sands are additionally acidic to pipelines and harder to clean when leaked (The New York Times 2012). Works citedBertrand, Pierre. Keystone Pipeline: 5 Things You Need to Know. International business times, January 19 2012. Web. 19, October, 2012.Blakey, Christina. Canadian Boom, Environmental Bust: The Tar Sands of Alberta. Political Science 335, Fall 2011, University of Hawai‘i at HiloBlanchard, James and Jacobson, David. Future of the Canada-United States Energy Relationship.

36 Canada-United States Literature Journal. 235 (2011-2012)Daugherty, Deon. Texas GOP Senate candidates strike similar energy policy platforms. Houston Business Journal, July 13, 2012. Web. 19, October, 2012Hargreaves, Steve. Keystone oil sands pipeline rejected, for now. CNN Money, January 18, 2012. Web. 19, October, 2012.Hoeven, John. Why we need the Keystone oil pipeline. CNN, February 24, 2012. Web. 19, October, 2012.Mufson, Steven. Keystone XL pipeline crosses political boundaries in Nebraska and beyond.

Washington post, October 18, 2012. Web. 19, October, 2012.The New York Times. Keystone XL Pipeline. The New York Times, October 18, 2012. Web. 19, October, 2012.