Food- Steroids. Anitbiotics. Sprays. Are food manufacturers killing us - Research Paper Example

English 11 October Topic Outline: The Benefits and Risks of Food Steroids, Antibiotics, and Sprays in the Eye of the Food Manufacturers andthe ConsumersThesis: The government should implement strict guidelines on the use of food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays in the production process instead of banning their use in order to balance the claims of the food manufacturers as well as the advocates of public health of the benefits and risks of these food enhancers.I. The benefits derived by food manufactured in using food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays. A. Production cost is low.B. Food-animals are healthier and more robust. C. Supply of food-animals in the market is abundant.II. Public health advocates argue that food manufacturers are killing the consumers by using food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays in their manufacturing process A.

Diseases that can be acquired from eating processed foods with food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays. 1. Cancer 2. Diabetes 3. Heart Diseases B. The routine use of antibiotics was a contributing factor in the surge of drug-resistant bacteria. C. Research of different scientists showing the risks of using food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays to humans.III. The role of the government in the use of food steroids, antibiotics, and food sprays by food manufacturers.

A. The research done by the National Research Council as commissioned by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) under the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).B. The regulations and guidelines issued by the government 1. The Animal Medicinal Drug Use Clarification Act 2. The Animal Drug Availability ActC. The recommendations of the government for the food manufacturing industry for the safety and health of consumers.

ConclusionThe food manufacturers have their valid reasons in lobbying for the government not to ban the use of food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays in the food industry. The public health advocates on the other hand, have solid grounds to encourage food manufacturers not to use food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays for the benefits of the consumers who are the main reason for flourishing profit of the food industry. It is then the intervention of the government by issuing strict guidelines on the use of food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays that could pacify the food manufacturers and the public health advocates who have a common ground – the consumers.

Works CitedAdams, Mike. “The U.S. Food Industry, FDA, and USDA Are Highly Corrupt to Protect Profits, Not People.” Natural News. n.d. Web. 10 Oct. 2012.“Does Giving Antibiotics to Animals Harm Humans?” Daily Herald. Arlington Heights, IL. April 30, 2012. Print.Guthrie, Margaret. “Fortifying Food.” The Scientist Vol. 22, No. 1. January 2008. Print.Jacobson, Michael F. “Tackling Salt.” Nutrition Action Healthletter Vol.35, No. 1. January- February 2008. Print.Lawley, Richard, Laurie Curtis and Judy Davis.

The Food Safety Hazard Guidebook. RSC Publishing. 2008. Print.Margulis, Charles. “Playing With Our Food: A Massive Food Experiment Already Underway.” Earth Island Journal Vol. 17, No. 4. Winter 2002. Print.National Research Council. The Use of Drugs in Food Animals: Risks and Benefits. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 1999. Print.Poisuo, Pauli. “The 6 Most Horrifying Lies The Food Industry Is Feeding You.” Cracked. n.d. Web. 10 Oct. 2012.Poulter, Sean. “The Proof Food Additives Are As Bad As We Feared.

” Mail Online. 18 May 2007. Web. 10 Oct. 2012.Raloff, Janet. “Hormones: Here’s the Beef: Environmental Concerns Reemerge over Steroids Given to Livestock.” Science News Vol. 161, No. 1. January 5, 2002. Print.