Analyzing film The Story of Bottled Water - Essay Example

Analyzing film “The Story of Bottled Water” The film “The story of Bottled Water” is a movie directed by Annie Leonard about bottled, drinking, and tap water. The film is remarkable as it explore much on how Americans spend much money buying bottles of water when it is accessible from the tap. While observing the video, the first thing one that one notice is that, tap water is easily available and for that reason, the film backs up tap water. This calls for attention on how effective the world would be if tap water was utilized more than bottled water.

Indeed, Americans would save their coins as most spend a lot of money purchasing bottled water. The film seeks to explain how bottled water is not safer than tap water thus people should opt for tap water that is cheaper. The most important pattern of the film is when it indicates how bottled water is a scam. Indeed, the simplest way of understanding this is by watching the short film that utilizes simple language and charming episodes that makes viewers walk through the economy of bottled water.

In brief, the film brings into attention benefits that emerge from taking tap water than bottled water. It indicates how bottle water is not often cleaner than tap water and worse to it cost expensive. To persuade the audience of its purpose, the film uses two strategies, which are simplest language and animation. The film uses simplest language that “Bottled water costs about 2, 000 times more than tap water.” The narrator proceeds by saying how bottled water is a lot pricier than tap water despite being not safer than tap water.

The film uses animation to contribute the effect of the video of most people taking ten bottled water that in total is a lot pricier. This video is created in such a way that, it persuades viewers to take tap water as it easily available and cheaper compared to bottled water that frequently derived from the tap, which is sometimes not safer than tap water. The film captures viewers’ attention when it recalls how the Coca-Cola Company discovered that its water exceeded the limit for carcinogen and bromated.

Still, it highlights how The Environmental Working Group tested ten bottled water to have contained harmful chemical pollutants thus, indicating how bottled water is not safer than tap water. The purpose of the video is to educate viewers on being cautious not to spend more money on bottled water while it is not safer than tap water. In doing this, he uses the text of how Americans spends a lot of money purchasing bottled water and indeed, it is not safer than tap water as it is mostly derived from tap water.

This text persuades the viewers to prefer taking tap water to bottled water, which is not safer and still cost expensively. It creates the need of utilizing tap water that is accessible and cheaper. The text persuades viewers as it captures viewers’ attention to comprehend how people waste a lot of money purchasing a commodity that is not safer and still costly. Indeed, this film is successful in achieving its purpose as it highlights historical approach of how in 2004, the Coca-Cola Company discovered that its water exceeded the required chemicals.

Still, the film outline how the environmental working group discovered that ten bottled water contained chemical pollutants. With this in mind, the film fulfils its purpose by giving evidences of why bottled water is not safer than tap water. The video is outstanding on how it presents its thoughts towards drinking water than bottled water. To persuade viewers, it uses two remarkable strategies, which are simplest language and animation that outline reasons why one should opt for tap water. Works CitedSaurabhMore.

The film “The story of Bottled Water. July 16, 2011.