Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1598567-analysis-essay-martin-luther-king-jr-the-world-house
https://studentshare.org/english/1598567-analysis-essay-martin-luther-king-jr-the-world-house.
Martin Luther King the World HouseMartin Luther King sees the world as a home that we have inherited “World House” where humanity has to share. To him, people from all races, black and white, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, or Buddhism have to learn to live with one another in peace and cooperation. Enabled by technology, the world is full of neighbourhoods that make us see what is happening to neighbours and respond to such needs. Fighting for justice or one’s rights will have a secondary meaning if a human being has to sleep on the streets with no food.
In one way or the other, Martin argues that all life is interrelated and what affects the poor may ultimately affect the rich ( Nadell, Langan and Comodromos 596-599). This paper examines the “world house” to provide an analysis of the value and other fundamental assumptions.The article conceptualises people to live in two realms, the internal, and the external. The inside has spiritual ends characterised by morals and values while outside is characterised by technology. Materialism subjugates the inner man hindering growth of the soul.
Thoreau as quoted in School life website agrees with this in his report to summarise the present life, “improved means to an improved end” (School life web). It is true that modernisation block spiritual growth, which in return nurtures people with a selfish character that do not for their fellow human beings have to go through every day. The famous saying every man for himself and God for us all gains meaning. A 2007 study on racism shows that racism continues to pervade Americans society and that law by the state do not play their role in its prevention (ACLU web).
Therefore, the idea of encouraging countries to fight poverty and other problems in developing countries is pertinent.As Luther presents the problem of poverty that may inhibit people to live in the world house properly, he presents the extent to which poverty is sinking in neighbourhoods. Well, it may not be true that two thirds of the world goes to bed hungry every night, but at least a substantial number have no homes and go to bed hungry. The impression he makes by his quest to solve this poverty problem is that every person has the caring heart like him and will work towards ending poverty.
The resources available to the rich nations can help developing countries come up with the key to end poverty. However, are they willing to help?Martin appeals to the audience using his trustworthy character, emotions, and logical reasoning. He persuades the audience by appealing to their emotions. One of the grave problems Martin wants solved for people to live in the world house is lack. To describe the extent of poverty, Martin uses statistics of the people who go hungry to bed every day. Apparently, two thirds of the world goes to bed hungry every day.
Many sleep on the street pavements because they do not have a place to call home ( Nadell, Langan and Comodromos 596-599). Martin called them impoverished children of God whose health is at stake (Shiman web). In this writing, Martin uses logos to persuade by reasoning. Different parts of the world have the same appeal to achieve parity with their fellow brothers from different races, or ethnicity. To martin, their argument is valid because people cannot remain forever oppressed. Nevertheless, one thing is of utmost concern to him.
What does it benefit anyone to have freedom and justice and live in a world stricken by poverty and doomed to extinction by war? This is pure logic.From this piece of writing, we understand the nature of Martin as a person concerned of other people’s affairs. He is appealing us by his sympathetic personality that will not wait and watch a fellow brother sleep hungry or go through the pains of destructive war ( Nadell, Langan and Comodromos 596-599). In conclusion, “World House” implies a peaceful world where every citizen and others has the same rights, live in peace, and have a place to call home.
He argues that with the current technology, no individual citizen is supposed to want in anything decent, especially food, clothing, medical, and shelter.Works CitedShiman, David. “The World House” University of Minnesota, Web, 12 June 2012, American Civil Liberties Union “Race and ethnicity in America” Web, 12 June 2012 Nadell, Judith, John Langan and Eliza Comodromos. The Longman Reader. New York: Pearson Education, Limited, 2011. Print.School Life. “The World House” Web, 12 June 2012,
Read More