Download file to see previous pages...
Their speech is a conditioned reflex accompanied by prejudgement of each other’s thoughts, which hinders communication. When Carol enters John’s office and presents his case, he gladly receives him as one of the needy students who have come for assistance. He abandons everything he was doing and sits to listen to the innocent college girl who wants to raise her grades. Several attempts by John to explain to Carol how she needs to study do not yield up anything because of the break up in communication. At one point, Carol misquotes John to have called her stupid. She twists words to have another meaning, which depicts her character.
In their conversation Carol and John use words like “what,” “I don’t understand,” “I don’t know what you are saying.” Carol and John are seeking of each other’s conversation meaning that they do not seem to understand one another. At one point, Carol thinks that “terms of art” have another meaning. On seeking for the meaning from John who had used it, he states that he does not know. With these unclear messages, you hear either Carol or John nodding in agreement or responding to what the other is saying. All this is bound to misinterpretation. For instance, according to Mamet,
After attempts to help Carol fails, Carol sobs deeply and John places his hand on her to comfort her. Carol throws his hand off her and she interprets this as a sexual harassment. Their conversation is interrupted by Johns wife who needs him at home and Carol Promises to come to the office the second time. The following day carol comes to John’s office with bills that show that she has filed a case with the tenure committee that John sexually harassed her. Professor’s noble efforts to help carol had been turned into something offensive. John could not understand such a misinterpretation and decided to sort things out with Carol, which only makes things worse. What the professor had though
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
However, Mamet who held himself out as a realist should have been amenable to method acting since it called for character credibility by virtue of the actor’s delivery and representation. This too is an important aspect of narrative and in particular beat narrative.
Aside from being looked down out of her being a woman, Gerber had experienced being harassed sexually by a doctor for the medical exam required upon entering the graduate school. Her womanhood was at the same time discriminated for a couple more instances.
Thesis John is a man full of honesty and courage, sympathy and charisma, but he fell a victim of Carol's malicious plans and racial envy.
John possesses static and heroic qualities, his is calm and honorable. He is a static characters marked by such features as harmony, integrity, stability.
The office also is directly involved in the plot of the play, since it represents the space where John is being threatened, at his work; therefore, Carol is an invader into this space, but John has the role of authority in it, which he uses to belittle her and
It targeted the ‘young mothers, office workers and retired persons, so as to help them keep fit.
According to Burker (2010), he stated that, with the rising issues of overweight, that predispose people to obesity, heart diseases and deaths, Toe Tappers
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Oleanna for FREE!