Download file to see previous pages...
e against Gay Marriage,” focuses on the potential negative effects of same-sex marriage on the educational and psychological development of children and how same-sex marriage is against liberalism. Thus, the main objections of the dissidents of same sex marriage are: 1) gay marriage should be illegal, because homosexual behavior is immoral (Ferguson 39), 2) allowing gay marriage will put a “stamp of approval” on gay conduct (Rajczi 488), 3) legalizing gay marriage is illiberal (Shell), and 4) same-sex marriage will weaken traditional marriage and produce a wide array of social harms (Nussbaum; Shell).
This paper provides counterarguments to these main arguments of those against same-sex marriage. The central rebuttal argument for this paper answers the question: Should gay marriages be allowed? The previous paragraph shows the major arguments of those against marriage. This paper presents counterarguments to the validity and credibility of these claims. It will provide an overview of the arguments against gay marriage, which will be countered one by one. Gay marriages should be allowed, because not all immoral actions have been sanctioned by the government; gay marriage is not against liberalism; gay conduct is an example of free speech act that the Constitution protects; and researchers against same-sex marriage have not provided concrete empirical evidence that same-sex marriage is bad for gay spouses, children, and society in general.
First, opponents of gay marriage argue that gay marriage should be illegal, because homosexual behavior is immoral (Ferguson 39; Whitehead 74). The state, however, is expected to treat all citizens as equals. When asked, “What does it mean for the government to treat its citizens as equals?” Ronald Dworkin eminently answers that “government must be neutral on what might be called the questions of the good life” (Barry 335). This pledge of neutrality is captured in the “Basic Principle” of liberalism: “The
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The second major point is the important ethical consideration in doing and publishing a research. As the various ethical and legal complexities are analysed, the course makes one able to be cautious of such challenges. The next major part is the use of language.
The criteria upon which the ethical issues are usually evaluated include but are not limited to religion, culture, and human nature. Different communities, groups, and people in the society prioritize these criteria as per their own understanding and choice which lays the basis of conflicts of opinions since a matter culturally justified might be religiously condemned.
One has to rethink always before acting which leads to my assumption that reasoning is argumentative. John Locker and Marx have trust in human reason though their perspectives seem to differ. According to the Locker, for example, human reasoning should lead them to a social contract in things they handle (Locke 21).
The proponent further compares these different attitudes to women’s roles in the workforce. The different periods in the US have corresponding impacts on the changing attitudes towards the women’s role and this can be evident from the reasonable factors that surface along the way as evidently discussed at the work at hand.
Her diagnostic evaluation of the American city is perhaps as accurate, precise and timely today as it was when the book was written. The heart of her argument is that a city needs diversity at all of its levels in order to flourish. Jacobs states that the ubiquitous principle "is the need of cities for a most intricate and close-grained diversity of uses that give each other constant mutual support, both economically and socially" (19).
The author casts light upon the peculiarities of the decisions made by consumers. The author also provides the idea of Jansson-Boyd who mentioned that researchers show that “it is not as simple as saying that consumers are or are not rational”. Hence, there are many factors which contribute to decision making process.
However, their attitude towards learning process may vary. It is important to understand that all human are not identical. So, type of personality matters a lot in this regard. When I remind my past, I find myself quite a
On this research, workforce consisting of more than five hundred employees in two companies were interviewed and asked their opinions concerning their overall production and components which facilitated its degradation in any workplace. Additional forty employees from a third company responded to questionnaires concerning the same issue and gave vast variant opinions.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Choose one out of three in the instructions for FREE!