Housing as a Common Need - Essay Example

Housing Housing is a common need; however it has different variables and dynamics associated with it. Especially n the case of college going there is a dire need for appropriate residing arrangements, which can match the mental and developmental approach of the person in question. Nonetheless, there may be definitive advantages and disadvantages to certain types of Housing arrangements, which can have an important effect on the students. The options in question shall be living in home, renting a single apartment, and renting a house with a group of friends. Lastly, on the option of renting a house with a group of friends. It is an option that shows sociable tendencies in a person, whereby he puts himself deliberately into a position where he can be amongst others in more ways than one. This tendency is a derivative of harmony, and highlights increased affinity for others within a person. It is purely an option that is driven by the need for recognition and approval. The probability is that the option and its consequences are familiar to common public; hence adopting this path is no new thing. In fact, doing this enables a person to be a part of a group, or a type of a person that he idolizes in terms of actions. Renting a house with a group of friends exhibits social supremacy. It depicts the intention of a person to have the want to go beyond limits in order to acquire social recognition. It is similar to another lion wanting to enter a pride. He feels that this is only way the conflict pertaining to dominance can be resolved - by joining the group! With renting a house with a group of friends, the person has speculated a possible response that is likely to some from the people concerned. The individual may not do so in a place which provides him with uncertainty. His prior interaction, and conception of the place is the primary factor which enables him to do the deed, otherwise it would not actualize. The second option of renting a single apartment is the second best option. It amounts to a much greater hassle as far as the intensity and repercussions are concerned. Options of housing in this realm are actually a type of escape, in which one is venting out the excess energy that is been surmounted due to other pressures and unresolved aims. Willfully committing an option that is likely to arm another person is representative of suppressed rage and anger, which has not been able to come out in a healthy way. Hence living alone would be the best solution for the person to carry out. Renting a single apartment is easily explained, simply because it is not an option that a person can creatively or originally think of. Renting a single apartment is an experience that has to be learnt in order to guarantee some form of success. The social divide and the option of renting a single apartment are also closely related. People who wish to acquire more, venture in greater and more dangerous deeds that would satisfy their urges. For college students, this option is socially satisfying as it makes them part of a cluster which can go beyond limits in defense of the aims they are nurturing. Even if this is not driven by need, this option clearly indicates the self-reliant intentions, of being oneself. With renting a single apartment, a person reckons with social reality based on everyday relations. The situation is thought-out, and the person deems it appropriate to conduct this option as he expects that the outcome will be in his favor. Based on previous experiences and perception, he would attempt to perform actions which are least in threat; the solace of independence. Looking at the option of living in home, it becomes applicable in the context that a person is trying to satisfy his motives by achieving a goal that is not otherwise easy. This concept would further go to add, that the option of not merely because of the need of a particular type of support, but actually to satisfy a need that has been generated due to some other insecurity. The option of living in home here would be explained in the context of the behavior that has been acquired out of dependence. Even if we assume that the option was a result of a need, the point arises as to how exactly did the person get the idea to stay back home. The answer lies in observational and social learning that takes place without knowing all the time. Television, movies, magazines, cartoon, elders, all create influences and generate ideas for a person. The option of living in home is hence an idea that is a repetition of a deed that was earlier known. Based on the need and requirement principle, the option of living in home can be understood. When people are not satisfied with what they have, and they get envious of what others around them do, them they are forced to adapt to means that are socially acceptable. They take their internal aims to the external level, and commit options that would narrow the gap creating the conflict. Every person tends to use internal conversation as a means of dealing with every other person and event happening outside. Hence with living in home, the person internalizes the event, and is wary of the situation at hand. The individual believes that this action is likely to produce the results he has already calculated. Therefore, the execution of his option is merely a process that he has thought out, not exactly a hassle for his sake. Definitely a position of advantage for the person; playing on safe territory. Though people may be largely different, but these options presented largely cover the frame of reference of all who fall in the said categories. Though all housing systems may well have advantages and disadvantages, the interesting thing remains, that there would always be a preference that would be followed in the social variations, pertaining to inter-group relations, assimilation patterns and housing patterns. Read More