We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Why Gun Control is not Enough, by Jeff Mcmahan - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Summary
The article, ‘Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough’, written by Jeff Mcmahan, was published on December 19, 2012 in the forum, The Stone, of The New York Times Magazine. The main theme of the article is that gun control is crucial in order to ensure safety…
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER

Extract of sample
Why Gun Control is not Enough, by Jeff Mcmahan

Download file to see previous pages... This paper tends to summarize the article, with a personal reflection in a later section. Mcmahan emphasizes upon the fact that owning guns makes the matter worse by making self-defense a kind of self-help. Allowing guns will make criminals better instead of eliminating crime. This is because they will become better equipped with better guns and readier to shoot. The more the guns, the more are the chances of accidental shots. Even a slight conflict will make people shoot at each other. The power of government and police will be diminished, because people will not look for help from security agencies and police, and will defend themselves through the use of guns. “The power of the citizens and that of the police approach parity,” states Mcmahan (2010, par.5). Moreover, it is all a matter of relative safety. Individuals owing guns will feel safe, and those without guns will be the most vulnerable, and will look forward to having guns. The state which will allow guns will feel safer than that which does not. “When only one state gets nuclear weapons, it enhances its own security but reduces that of others, which have become more vulnerable,” writes Mcmahan (2012, par.10). This relative safety will disturb the balance of power and peace among people, agencies, and nations. Mcmahan further writes that gun control is a good solution because it limits the use of guns both for the criminals and for common men. He writes, “…we would all be safer if no one had guns — or, rather, no one other than trained and legally constrained police officers” (2012, par.12). With gun control, people will start trusting the police force for domestic defense. Mcmahan asserts that gun advocates present their arguments against gun control, but neither of them is valid, except that the prohibition and effective implementation of gun control is not easy. Mcmahan ends his article by saying that the United States is suffering from much more violence and violent incidents that the rest of Western countries because of easy access to firearms, and gun advocates should give their arguments a second thought as to whether guns should be allowed or not. Personal Reflection Mcmahan has very effectively described the importance of gun control and gun prohibition by presenting arguments from both sides, and has efficiently cleared his stance on the topic. Since owning a gun is beneficial and dangerous both at the same time, thus, it becomes important to discuss who should be able to own a gun. Efforts have always been made in order to decrease criminal activity around the globe, among which taking away guns is thought to be one such effort, when it is not. Although Mcmahan asserts that gun control will result in less violence and crime, I believe that common men should be allowed to own guns so that they can protect themselves. The most important point here is how the citizens are going to ensure their safety when they are told to turn in their guns, just as Boylan (2004, p.130) states in his book. People wish to keep guns to enjoy their autonomy and guarantee their safety when they meet robbers, criminals and terrorists. Armed citizens feel their strength in protecting themselves and their families from physically stronger criminals. I disagree when Mcmahan (2012, par.3) states, “When most citizens are armed, as they were in the Wild West, crime doesn’t cease. Instead, criminals work to be better armed…” I believe that criminals will still get better if guns are banned, because the wrongdoers will still obtain guns and ammunition from whatever illegal sources. And who will be in loss? The common man, because he will have no illegal source of owning a gun. Owning guns is one of people’ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Gun Control
Before buying a gun, one must get a permit from the authorities and the buyer must pass a record check. The records check is voluntary and necessitates a minimum waiting period between the original purchase effort and the ultimate delivery of the gun, which is almost similar to the Application to purchase system
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Gun Control
The crowd inclded young children, teenagers and even a judge. Most just wanted to meet her and wish her well whereas others wanted to ask her questions. But one man, Jared Lee Lougher, had a different agenda on his mind. He arrived at the spot some time after 10 a.m carrying a semiautomatic 9mm glock.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
GUN CONTROL
If the public was denied the right to possess guns for their own safety, there will occur many changes within the society. According to Barbara, “Gun control will have effects on the general public that may be detrimental but in general, the control of firearms is critical” (Barbara 103).
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Gun control
In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported that total of 11,600 homicides were committed with firearms, claiming 68% of all homicides (Kleck, 2009: p. 1). In addition, about 100,000 to 150,000 people a year suffer non-fatal gunshot injuries (Kleck, 2009: p.
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay
Gun Control
In essence, the march leading to a demonstration basically called for gun control albeit it sugarcoated its approach by citing rhetorics that does sound like gun control (i.e. gun responsibility). It was a knee jerk response to the recent shooting in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut that left 20 children and six adults dead (Martinez and Scmidt).
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Gun Control
The ownership of a gun in the United States of America applies as an individual’s right, if kept for self defense. Different views about gun control translate to the different opinions that diverse people hold about their American dream. While some legislatures promote gun controls, others oppose gun control with the view that people should not bear firearms because of incidents of improper use.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Gun Control
Gun control leads to focusing on appropriate use of firearms, that may be used inappropriately and in an improper violating way by others. There are legislations and laws are designed for the use of firearms. Most of the legislations are designed focusing on the reduced use of forearms and protecting the rights of common men and individuals.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Gun Control
While some support gun control, others support gun rights. Nonetheless, gun control includes the laws, rules, and regulations, which restrict the manufacture, sale, ownership, and use of guns.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Gun Control
It has been argued that the more guns a country have the more number of homicides. According to data analyzed by the Harvard school of Public Health, guns and homicides go together. I concur with this argument with the grounds that if a citizen has easy access to guns, they are more likely to kill each other.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Gun Control
The issue of gun control is one such issue that has sparked arguments in the United States. Proponents of gun control argue that the availability of firearms for
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Why Gun Control is not Enough, by Jeff Mcmahan for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us