Why America should still be on guard against Terrorist - Essay Example

? Why America Should Still Be On Guard From Terrorist Attacks by Travis L. Hawkins 12 Dec Why America Should Still Be On Guard From Terrorist Attacks The United States, being a world's superpower, is less susceptible to combat defeat. However, it is more insecure to the hostility of other nations. For instance, unpretentious about its aptitude and achievements, the liberal aspect in helping others, is loved. Nevertheless, its attempts to control others, is loathed. Since the 9/11 radical attacks, the war and America’s move changed to mean rather different for the U.S. men in service, which has used up the last decade combating all kinds of unconventional enemies who use guerilla warfare and are more ephemeral than ever. The presidents Bush and Obama have employed new setting to sanction military action in regions most Americans know little of like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Yemen. The intimidations facing the United States are so immense and ever shifting, they entail diverse responses of force and not essentially the endorsement of assembly. The country should still be in the guard for terrorist attacks since the concepts of terrorism are changing daily. The kind of terrorism in the globe today is constantly changing in terms of the strategies that make it more complicated and harder to track. The acts of terrorism are constantly aimed at the public in terms of maiming and causing fear to spread across the nations. US has always made it clear that these attacks are not going without response judging by the advances the country has made to counter al kinds of terrorism. The threats on terrorism are changing from the 9/11 kind to more diverse types of terrorism. The fight against terrorism in the country is more evident in the sense that more radical are coming up with better ways to do their bidding. The advance in the technology had made it easier for them to articulate their terrorist acts on the country. The evolution of the terrorists attacks has changed from the normal forms into maritime, cyber, and even the economic biological and outer space terrorism. The initial official response picked up in America after the bombardments in Boston are heartening. President Barack took pains to continue being calm, contravening with the appalling conventions of the Bush management to guarantee reprisal while arousing the rule of law. Obama knows that the United States needs no new terrorist laws, no new regime agencies, no increase of police and intelligence operations and, the majority of all, no more provocative speeches. The staged search for the two bombing suspects was incontrovertibly a manhunt, and the social networks, particularly Twitter, were filled with false allegations and unbearable invective. However, none of this transforms the feature of Obama's actions, whose speech was patriotic in an optimistic intellect, relaxed and packed with assurance in the president's own, usually legitimized general power. This was in line with the act of Queen Elizabeth II who as a role model managed to set a comparable tone after the London attacks in 2005 (Bruce 4). She gave her subjects of her condolences and showed her sadness and compassion for the fatalities, she thanked the crisis services and the population of London, and then she said, shortly and in brief, that those who perpetrate these atrocious acts against blameless people should know that they do not change the lives of the people they hurt. This is what the voice of development sounds like, and it cannot be permissible to fall silent simply because a few cave inhabitants are continually feeling marginalized. At present and in the future, people should always recap the judgment of the Queen's and Obama's calm words each time terror occurs once again. In fact, the message to such killers ought to always be the same they will never change the lives of the ones they hurt. They can propel bombs, but the culture, the values, and the maimed society grow mightier than the desire to annihilate them. These varied attacks are some of the reasons that the country ought to look into and know that they are acts of terror that happen ones in a while to strike fear to the population. However, the evolution of terrorism also makes it plausible to have the government watch out for the terror attacks. Cyber terrorism New ways of terrorism have seen the country in many feuds with other nations over the stolen information. Recently the uses of cyber threats have found route to the countries secrets, which is sold to other nations. This type of terrorism give the country the need to have the high alerts for attacks however little the terror threat may be to the nation. The security of the nation’s secrets is very precious for the keeping of the balance in the country. U.S. being a super power the security of the country and it operation is very important in the sense that the country needs to have more security from this type of terror. The access of top-secret information may cause a government collapse or an attack from the radicals who look into making the nations citizen suffer. For instance, information on the weaponry the country has very dire consequences if the technology on the weapon manufacture gets into wrong hands (Crenshaw 384). The possibility of a terrorist to have access to the controlling system of the dams, power grids is narrow but still the government must be ready for the possibility of such attacks in the system. The access of the air traffic control is another high profile attack sector that can cause devastating outcomes of any attack is made (Catignani 245). However, the prospects of this kind of attack the guard on this kind of threats are very realistic in the making. To counter before it happens is the best guard for the terror attack. Therefore, the need to have the risk assessment and the fact that the risks can actually happen if not protected makes it plausible to gauge the kind of damage the event of such magnitude if it ever happens in the nation. Cyber terrorism is one of the international threats to peace and security in the 21stcentury where there is the little access of information can cause an economic meltdown in the nations. The technological impact in the globe makes these threats more apparent and therefore U.S. needs to be on the lookout for attacks not only from the terrorists but to the information hungry administrations. Issues and challenges The rise in the funding of radical groups has lately increased and the threat it poses make the terrorists more dangerous and the access to the weapons technology is more greatly served by the fact that the people are trained to use such technology (Bjorgo n.p). These technologies are sold to any one at the sufficient cash prices that make the sellers more money inclined rather than the use of the technologies to promote peace in the world (Bruce 4). Such acts give the nation more caution for the possibility that the radicals may have intentions and may be planning on articulation of the plans in the future. Because of the increase of information exits and rivalry with rising number of other aggressive groups, terror campaign now needs a greatly amplified amount of innovation to attract the consideration it requires. The heights of these threats are high and the underlying issues are the counter the magnitude of this attacks pack. According to Mohd the rise in the access of the destructive aptitude in the world calls for more vigilance in the watch out for the terror attacks (Mohd 4). He asserts that the assessment of the risks involved and the costs to protect the public from such threats comes in handy in looking at a peaceful nation with the citizens living in the without fear of attacks. Apart from the natural terrorism, the guard on terror goes on for all kinds of terror in the nation. This comes in as a reminder that the paradigms of terror have drastically changed and economy lately has terrorism. Conclusion Much can be learned from these terror attacks in London and the Boston attacks, especially since the incident of homespun terrorism by young migrant Muslims is comparatively a new paradigm. As many Western countries face similar problems, comparison of cases could bring insight into this particular phenomenon to a higher level. Still, drawing experiences from the past can lead to generalization and wrong similar being drawn amid past events and recent advances. There has not been a pattern of a particular hard line advance being able to overwhelm a radical organization. Internal cluster dynamics, timing of control actions in opposition to the acts and supplementary aspects of terror all play their part in the termination of a terrorism in the nation Work cited Mohd Hafizzuddin MD Damiri Malaysian Institute of Defence and Security (MiDAS) Benjamin, D. and S. Simon (2003) The Age of Sacred Terror: Radical Islam’s War Against America, New York Random House Bjorgo, T. ed. (2005) Root Causes of Terrorism: Myths, Reality and Way Forward, London: Routledge Borum, R. (2003) Psychology of Terrorism, University of South Florida, available online < http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/208551.pdf > Catignani, S. (2005) “The Security Imperative in Counterterror Operations: The Israeli Fight Against Suicidal Terror” In Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 17, No. 1/2, pp. 245-264 Club de Madrid International Summit on Democracy, Terrorism and Security (2005), Addressing the Causes of Terrorism, Volume I. Spain Crenshaw, M. (1981) “The Causes of Terrorism.” Comparative Politics, Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 379-399 Bruce Hoffman “Countering Terrorist Use of the Web as a Weapon,” CTC Sentinel, vol.1,no. 1, pp 4-5, December 2007 Bruce Hoffman, Inside Terrorism, NY: Columbia University Press, July 2006 Lansford, Tom, Robert P. Watson, and Jack Covarrubias. America's War on Terror. Farnham, England: Ashgate, 2009. Internet resource. Cordesman, Anthony H, Paul S. Frederiksen, and William D. Sullivan. Salvaging American Defense. Washington, D.C: CSIS Press, 2007. Print. Metz, Steven. Iraq & the Evolution of American Strategy. Washington, D.C: Potomac Books, 2008. Print. Schmitt, Gary J. Safety, Liberty, and Islamist Terrorism: American and European Approaches to Domestic Counterterrorism. Washington, D.C: AEI Press, 2010. Print. Read More