Strengths and Weaknesses of Discrimination Discussion - Essay Example

? Article Review February 9, Summary The article contains some strengths and weaknesses. The article offers a wrong impression on the readers that killing people with abnormalities is an obligation. The same article shows that some groups, including the German army, feel they have a duty to kill members of other groups, including the Jews. The claims are strongly supported by warrants, grounds and backings. The warrants, ground, backings of the formal article’s discrimination discussion firmly supports the claims. Thesis Statement The article’s thesis is: The article’s discrimination discussion’s claims, warrants, grounds and formal language have both strengths and weaknesses. The article focuses on discrimination. The article offers examples of how one race or community imposes harsh treatments on other communities or races. The article claims that one group of individuals wreak havoc on their conceived freaks of society. The freaks include the dwarfs. Another group of freaks are the Jews. A third group of freaks are the people of African ethnicity. Strengths There are strengths in the article’s discussion. First, the article offers stories to prove the freak theory is correct (Rottenberg & Winchell 719). Some babies are killed prior to their being form in order to prevent hardships. For example, deformed babies may suffer the lifelong effects of their deformities. Consequently, killing the babies at such a very young age will stop the child’s lifelong suffering. Likewise, the article states that killing the deformed babies will remove the parents’ difficulties. The parents will have to pay for the education, medical, food, and other needs of the deformed babies throughout the parents’ lives. Killing the deformed children will remove the parents’ hardships. Weaknesses On the other hand, there are weaknesses in the article’s discussion. The article espouses implementation of the discrimination acts. Discrimination violates the constitution and the people’s right to live equality beneficial lives. The article espouses that the White race actively discriminated against the African Americans. In addition, the article discusses how Germany’s leader, Adolf Hitler, orchestrated the mass genocide of Jews. The statement brings out horrible pictures of old Jews, pregnant mothers, toddlers, and physically incapacitated Jews murdered because of only one fault. The Hitler army faulted the Jews because they were born and espoused Jewish faith (Rottenberg & Winchell 721). A: First Supporting Claim The article espoused that some humans are discriminatory in nature. Grounds The article shows that some sectors of society treat people who not born as normal human beings are inhumanely treated as freaks. Consequently, the same sectors hinder the people with disabilities’ equal life and opportunities. The Whites treat the individuals of African heritage as lesser human beings. For example, the German Army murdered the Jews (Rottenberg & Winchell 721). The claims of the article are based on sufficient grounds. The articles bring out actual facts. The readers will readily accept the supporting claim that the supporting claim the Germans murdered the Jews because they are treated as of a lesser unworthy race. Several movies and books have shown footages and other proofs that the Germans murdered thousands of Jews in the concentration camps. As proof, Germany’s Adolf Hitler committed suicide. Adolf Hitler committed suicide to avoid being captured and punished by the approaching combined army. The army was composed of the United States, United Kingdom and other countries’ armies (Rottenberg & Winchell 721). Warrant Treating people as freaks is a form of discrimination. Freaks include the Elephant man. The killing of the Jew is discrimination. The treating of people of African heritage as lesser value human beings is discrimination (720). B: Second Supporting Claim The article proposes that other humans punish those who discriminate. Grounds Laws were imposed to help other humans punish those guilty of treating other human beings as freaks. Laws were implemented punishing those who kill other human beings, including the Jews. Laws are made to ensure the jailing of those who treat people of African descent as lesser human beings (Rottenberg & Winchell 721). Warrants The other human beings use the laws to stop those found treating other human beings unfairly. Several cases have been filed in the courts of law against people who violate the anti-discrimination laws. British tribunals and the European Court of Justice decide discrimination cases filed against violators within the United Kingdom and the European Union, respectively (Hunter 23). Backings The warrants have sufficient backings. The law states that discrimination not treating another person on equal ground. The law enumerates that discrimination is occurs when one person or group is not treated equality because of one’s religion. The Germans killed the Jews because of their religious belief (Rottenberg & Winchell 721). Discrimination includes not treating another person or group equally because of one’s race or ethnicity. The German’s killing of Blacks falls under race or ethnicity discrimination. Treating one person as a freak falls under discrimination based on one’s physical incapacity (Rottenberg & Winchell 721). C: Fallacies in the article’s statements. The fallacies include wrong interpretations of how some groups treat other individuals and persons of other groups. The Germans believed that it was their duty to eradicate the Jews. The Germans felt that the Jews were not on the same human being level. The Germans did not have any remorse when they murdered thousands of innocent Jews (Rottenberg & Winchell 721). Some members of society felt that weeding out the persons with abnormalities or incapacities from society is the right thing to do, just because they have the power to do so. Further, the article shows the fallacy that deformed humans are not on the same level as the normally formed humans. The article shows that several freaks were experimented on. Likewise, the article shows that shows are conducted to show the freaks of society. The normal people make a mockery of the so called freaks of society (Rottenberg & Winchell 719). The nation’s laws penalized discrimination of all individuals. The laws prohibit discriminating against persons because of their physical deformities. Consequently, the law punishes the culprits for imposing harsh acts or unfair acts on persons with disabilities. Further, the law strongly prohibits the people being unfair to persons having different religions or beliefs. World War II ended with many countries combining forces. The combined forces attacked and overpowered the German army. The combined global army, led by the United States and United Kingdom, punished the German army for the killing of the Jews, among other crimes (Bliss30). D: Choice of Language The choice of language used in making the article is formal. The article does not use words that curse the human rights violators. Historical data is abundantly presented to convince the readers to accept the article’s discrimination claims. The article indicates how the freak victims suffered under the hands of the abusive normal citizens of the community. The same article offers convincing evidence of Germany’s atrocities against people, Jews, who are practicing a different religion (Rottenberg & Winchell 719). The article uses emotive and picturesque language. Discussing the murder of the Jews angers most of the article’s readers. Discussing the treatment some members of society as freaks will impress on the article readers that such practices should be stopped, at all cost (Rottenberg & Winchell 719). Conclusion: The article has some weaknesses and strengths. The article gives a wrong impression on the readers that killing people with abnormalities is an obligation. The same article espouses that some communities, including the German army, theorize that some groups should be eradicated from the face of the earth, including the Jews. The claims are strongly supported by warrants, grounds and backings. Evidently, the article’s discrimination topic’s claims, warrants, grounds, backings, and formal language contain both strengths and weaknesses. Works Cited: Bliss, John. Jewish Migration. New York: Raintree, 2012. Hunter, Rosemary. Indirect Discrimination in the Workplace. New York: Federatin Press, 1992. Langley, Andrew. Living Through World War II. New York: Raintree , 2012. Rottenberg, Annette, Winchell Donna Haisty. Elements of Argument: A Text and Reader. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2012. Print. Read More