Name English June 2, 2015 Should Sugary Drinks Be Taxed Like Cigarettes? Sugary drinks have been the subject of recent controversial debates in terms of potentials for being taxed, as proposed initially in the city of Richmond in California…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Should Sugary Drinks Be Taxed Like Cigarettes"
Download file to see previous pages
The people who oppose the imposition of taxes on sugary drinks include Mohammed Elzofri, a reported store owner; Corky Booze, an alleged former auto racer; and various agencies such as the American Beverage Association, which governs the beverage industry and particularly supports companies such as “Coke, Pepsi, Red Bull, and Gatorade” (Should Sugary Drinks Be Taxed Like Cigarettes? Calif. City Considering Idea par. 25); as well as the Americans Against Food Taxes. According to Elzofri, imposing taxes on sugary drinks, particularly on sodas would significantly be detrimental to the poor people and to business owners like him. His support was that more than 80 percent of people who purchase from his store buy sugary drinks and thus, imposing a tax on these would definitely make the drinks more expensive and possibly prohibitive. It was revealed that a tax on a two-liter drink would be tantamount to an addition of 68 cents to the current selling price. Concurrently, Booze was reported to have averred that the government should not dictate what people should or should not consume and the imposition of the tax on sugary drinks would be most hurtful to the local community. He noted that the poor people who do not have the means to leave the city and purchase these drinks in other cities that do not impose taxes on them would be left with no options except to contend with these or not to purchase them at all. While other local citizens who could afford to leave Richmond would just purchase these drinks in other cities. This was corroborated by the American Beverage Association which shared Booze’s contentions that the imposition of taxes on sugary drinks would be most hurtful to those who could not afford. On the other hand, the people who were reported to openly support the imposition of taxes on sugary drinks include Dr. Jeff Ritterman, a cardiologist and also the city councilman; Doria Robinson, a noted community activist; and Dr. Kristen Bibbin Domingo, who is allegedly an internist at the University of California, San Francisco. According to Ritterman, the imposition of taxes on sugary drinks is seen as an effective way to prevent obesity. This was supported by Domingo, who apparently conducted a study on the effect of a tax imposition on sugary drinks to health and medical costs. As disclosed by Domingo, “a nationwide penny-per-ounce soda tax would reduce consumption by 15 percent and would, over a 10-year period, prevent several million diabetes cases and nearly 100,000 heart disease cases, as well as saving $17 billion in medical costs” (Should Sugary Drinks Be Taxed Like Cigarettes? Calif. City Considering Idea par. 30). In addition to substantial savings on medical costs, the tax imposition would allegedly generate as much as $3 million in revenues, as alleged by Ritterman. These are definite benefits for the city and for the health of the constituents. As added by Ritterman, the revenues could be earmarked from programs such as “local sports fields, diabetes treatment for low-income children, and school-based nutrition classes” (Should Sugary Drinks Be Taxed Like Cigarettes? Calif. City Considering Idea par. 12). Likewise, Robinson, the community activist concurred that a tax on sugary drinks would eventually assist in breaking the addiction on sodas; and therefore, corroborates Ritterman’
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Sumptuary tax, also known as a sin tax, is a form of taxation that imposes an additional charge on culturally disfavored products such as cigarettes, liquor, gambling, and so on, appeals to voters who view it as a way of discouraging consumption of these objectionable products.1 Yet the temptation to impose taxes is one driven by economic reasons and has proven to be very lucrative and worthwhile.
Being a delicious drink, there is chemistry behind soda drinks that involves carbonation processes, which are evident by the provision of bubbles. Soft drinks are circulated on the market worldwide through cans, glasses, as well as bottles as forms of packaging.
Caffeine is drug naturally produced in leaves and seeds of many plants but it can be manufactured artificially as a food additive. The reason why caffeine is identified as a drug is that it is a central nervous system stimulant causing increased alertness and awareness as a result; people tend to use the energy drinks that contain caffeine to obtain an impermanent energy boost as well as elevate their mood.
Shopping online may be different in terms of experience, however money is still exchanged for goods - but the purchase may be made from a physically remote location. If tax is to be charged then how does one then resolve where to source the tax Supreme Court ruling in 1992 stopped states from collecting tax on out of state merchants' phone, mail or internet orders - orders which shipped goods into another state (Wiener, Leonard).
It is important for such individuals to reduce the amounts of energy drinks they consume due to the resulting adverse effects including increased blood pressure and weight gain. However, the dangers associated with these drinks are facing a lot of press because of the
The alternative product to cigarette smoking is called E-Cigarettes. An E-Cigarette is a handheld electronic cigarette devise, which vaporizes flavored liquid that usually contains Nicotine and other chemicals.
A lot of people are coming up with ways to fix both problems. One way is to levy higher tax on sugary beverages like soda. This will discourage people from overfly engaging in soda drinking on the one hand and increase the government’s earnings on the other.
It is so because most these are the institutions where most sports people are (Gunja 2012, p.48). These drinks are known to have many different health risks as well as benefits to those who use them.
Sports drinks include all the beverages having
Energy drinks have many ingredients that define its working. The most important one of them is the caffeine and simple sugars. Caffeine is highest in percentage and it is important as it motivates the body to generate energy. On the other
The author states that questions whether the new technology will help getting rid of cigarettes by offering safe smoking remains in the public’s head and other public health groups. Safety concerns associated with e-cigarettes may be killed if the regulations are too strict even though the real safety of the products is still in doubt.
17 Pages(4250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Should Sugary Drinks Be Taxed Like Cigarettes"
with a personal 20% discount.