Art, science, and imagination - Essay Example

In particular the author has identified the changing technology to be the main factor in the determining changes that are eminent in our society. The culture image has over days changed due to the concept of receiving and perception of the images that are around us. Berger further states that the current demand for visualization of images is so high in our present world that the images end up being degraded by the same people visualizing them. According to Berger, one has to deeply understand something before appreciating it otherwise any judgment prior to this is unjust.

All through the paper, he maintains that people always look at things and visualizes them even in dreams. However very few people do have the chance of showing interest on the actual happening of what they see rather their assumptions are always made from the things that they can see. Very few people find out what is happening in the inside and so make a lot of unjustified judgments. Due to this fact, he maintains that people have wrongly used the appearance instability to make judgments. He maintains that there is very minimal chance of a new product being made with its source being in direct contact with it.

Most of the theories of Berger are justified but at some point, I fail to agree with him. I believe that there is a major role that anxiety plays in the understanding of how an object is like, to someone viewing it. This is because some viewers take no time to know what is inside the object that they are looking at. According to Berger, most of the viewers tend to be blind to the real life that they are living and as a result, they fail to understand what the real images that they see contain.

As a result of this, communication in the current society is much complex. Wilson E.O presents a very contradicting idea to Berger’s ideas through his essay “The Bird of Paradise”. Depicting himself as a hunter and a poet, he links both the world of science and art. He narrates how he came into contact with nature in a research. Berger concludes that natural selection plays a major role in explaining how synthetic and analytic perspectives are reached. According to him, both work together to ensure the success of natural selection.

This is contradictive to the theory of Berger in which he insists that the world of artists are based on theory, and how people interpret art and imagine personal things. This would therefore mean that the world of art and science are too complex to merge. In her essay, “Imagination and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature” Emily Brady maintains that the individual subject is vital to the appreciation of all forms of art. By so it means that every individual can appreciate art in their own way through visualization of any image.

This is in contrast to Berger’s essay in which he maintains that visualizations without the deep understanding of an image are not possible. Emily insists that the aesthetic responses to art are guided by the art itself and the individual preference. Therefore some people may not appreciate the work of an artist not because they have not looked at it from within but because of their own personal preference. I can deeply understand this theory in my daily life while playing piano. A year ago, I fell in love with Chopin’s music and started to practice it.

During the first a few days of practicing, I focused mainly on the basic skills and closely followed the music paper, the accuracy of the notes, strength of the staccato, and the