Belief, Doubt and Synthesis - Essay Example

Belief, Doubt and Synthesis Beliefs, strongly held as propositions, can combine to formulate a set of beliefs called credo by any individual or group of individual. Beliefs and credos guide people through their daily activities either in their professional or even in their social environments. In the context of writing, people believe in different concepts regarding the ideal manner of carrying out any form of writing assignment. The process of writing entails integrating the available resources like time and knowledge materials in presenting opinions and facts on professional topics (Starnino 38). Writing is one of the most significant professions in the US today. Based on this fact, numerous philosophies and principles apply in defining the ideal qualities and skills required of talented writers. These principles are subjective and mostly depend on the factors that determine the purpose of writing. In this regards, we have to acknowledge that not all writers possess the same qualities, as some of the American writers are better than others. Despite the fact that not all writers are equal in their skill sets, there should be a standard of differentiating smartest writers from poor ones. In this regard, I belief one should possess some of the fundamental qualities if he/she is to be considered as a professional writer (Starnino 42). The qualities of a writer fall into personal and technical skills. Possession of strong personal qualities entails the application of effective communication skills in presenting ones ideas and thoughts in written form. In America, every writer enjoys freedom of speech and expression in his or her work. Writers are free to express their thoughts in whatever manner they wish, as long as their work falls within the scope of national rules and regulations. In this regard, writers face the predisposition of expressing their thoughts in an appropriate language as per the environment in subject. In trying to justify their thoughts and philosophies, writers can engage in persuasive, assertive or criticizing pieces of work (Lutovich and Fisher 67). One should integrate all these freedoms of thought and language in developing persuasive or even criticizing essays in order to accomplish writing goals. In this case, I belief a brilliant writer should be creative, vivid and imaginative. For example, a writer in a political arena speculating about the future of a nation’s politics should be imaginative and creative in persuading his followers and criticizing those opposing. Coherent development of political essays requires a writer to articulate the freedoms available with the communication skills in ensuring effective delivery of the intended message to the target audience (Lutovich and Fisher 72). In addition to personal skills, a talented writer should have a thorough understanding of the technical qualities of writing. I belief the first technical quality of expert writes is the ability to communicate fluently in written language. English writers must follow grammatical rules in every piece of their work. Efficient use of English will facilitate delivery of the message in an objective manner. Since the better part of writing entails collection of information from both the primary and secondary sources, a writer should also have strong research skills. He or she should carry out a research exercise from the problem definition stage to the results interpretation stage. Every writer should be conversant with the fundamental concepts of the topic of writing and should use relevant and appropriate vocabulary in expressing his or her ideas. Lastly, a talented writer should organize the essential parts of an essay in a logical pattern. Integration of these technical skills with the above mentioned communication qualities in an essay provide a criterion of defining a lovely piece of writing (Lutovich and Fisher 61). Human beings are in a continuous process or receiving new ideas and meeting new patterns of thoughts in their lives. When one meets a new idea, he/she subjects it to some rigorous evaluation to check for the aspects of truth and validity. Ideas and thoughts from other people may receive acceptance without much deliberation on their validity, but personal beliefs may experience thorough evaluation and doubt. The concept of doubt refers to the mental state of uncertainty and suspense regarding a necessary decision. Some forces of uncertainty and doubt accompany operation and existence of beliefs and credo in daily activities. One belief concerning some proposition may hold true in one environment or situation and questionable in another (Boucher 68). In such a case, the person holding the belief starts to doubt and to question the validity and reliability of his or her belief. The process of doubting one’s beliefs may result in restructuring of modification of the ideologies, in these beliefs. Continuous doubt on the validity a belief may result in decreased confidence when applying the belief in real life situations. However, I belief doubt helps an individual to reconsider and strengthen his or her beliefs; hence ensuring the formulation of objective credo in life. I my life, I am fond of doubting some of my beliefs more than I tend to doubt the new ideas proposed by my colleagues and friends. For example, I hold the philosophical belief that whatever goes around comes around. However, I seem do doubt it in certain situations where this premise does not seem to be true (Boucher 57). I have done numerous pieces of writing concerning the judicial aspect of abortion. In my arguments, I agree to the belief that a fetus is a human being and has a right to live. The reference of my thoughts and ideas in the abortion arguments come from the social and religious aspects. I belief life begins at conception, and, abortion is an act of deliberate murder. However, I receive a lot of criticism from those supporting the practice of abortion. In their arguments, they state that abortion of unwanted pregnancies will help in addressing the issue of rapid population growth in the nation (Bartal 43). In addition, the supporters of abortion acknowledge the benefits of practice in providing a solution to complicated medical situations of pregnant women. In this context, my arguments concerning the illegitimacy of abortion does not hold in an environment dominated by abortion supporters. In my writings, I have based most of my law and terrorism ideologies on the claim that Islam faith is responsible for the terror acts in the world. In the context, of theology, I belief every religion is aims at creating a peaceful society without any evil deeds. However, the political claims linking Islam and terrorism have permeated most of my writings involving the issue of terror acts in the society today (Bartal 121). The credo I developed in the first part of my essay, on the beliefs of proficient writing skills, experiences some attacks in situations where I lack evidence in my arguments. According to the credo, I belief a brilliant writer should possess strong research skills. However, my claim has met numerous attacks and criticism from those holding contrary opinion on the quality of research skills. For example, most of the creative and fictional writers are significant, yet they are not necessary to employ any research skills in developing their writings. In this context, I lack the evidence to justify the importance of research skills in fictional writing. Because of this weak belief, I had to doubt the validity of some of the beliefs contained in my credo. My doubts will revolve around the technical qualities required of a good writer. I have realized that these technical qualities I listed are not necessary for every writer, but depend on the writing involved. Therefore, research skills are significant for writings covering the topics of science, business, applied sociology among others, but not on subjects like literature and fictional writings (Lutovich and Fisher 79). In actual practice, a credo is subject to doubts and inadequacies of holding true in all the environments of application. The appreciation of doubt in developing objective beliefs helps in highlight the weaknesses contained in any set of beliefs. In addition, arguments unearth the flaws present in a credo. During arguments, all the beliefs contained in a credo should hold true. In case, this does not happen thorough consideration and deliberation of the beliefs is necessary to modify the credo in compliance with the identified new ideologies (Starnino 131). The beliefs contained in my first credo does not hold true at all situations. Therefore, the process of doubt and lack of evidence during arguments highlights the flaws. One of the weaknesses in these beliefs on writing qualities involves the generalization of skills required of a good writer. In addition, I failed to acknowledge that skills required of writers differ depending on the writing services involved. In addition, the elements of personal and communication skills are unnecessary of every writer in the writing field. Some elements apply mostly to certain writing fields than to others (Starnino 114). One of the weaknesses identified in the credo concerns the qualities or research skills in professional writers. Based on the process of doubt and lack of evidence during arguments, I realized that research skills are not necessary of every professional writer (Lutovich and Fisher 101). At this point, we ought to consider a writers competence from the perspective of the writings. Scientific research writers require a thorough understanding on the concepts and application of research tools and techniques. On the other part, of communication skills, scientific writers and those dealing with project management reports may be unnecessary to possess crucial imaginative and creative skills. However, fictional and argument essay writers should be vivid, imaginative and creative. In this case, I will fix the weaknesses in my earlier credo by restating my belief that scientific and applied scientific writers are significant to possess excellent research skills. In addition, creativity and imagination are the qualities required of fictional and persuasive writers (Lutovich and Fisher 92). In addition to the correction made on the weaknesses identified in the credo, I would like to add some new concerns and beliefs of persuasive writing qualities. I belief smartest writers should be time conscious in handling their writing assignments. I writer ought to complete his or her assignment in time to ensure availability of more time to handle corrections and editing procedures of the final draft. Writers should be engaged in any piece of writing by providing examples of situations from personal experience. Moreover, I belief every writer should develop and follow instructions meant to provide direction on the topic of writing (Lutovich and Fisher 45). One could ensure exhaustive writing by following instructions, requirements and details. Based on the additions and corrections made to the earlier credo, my beliefs on the qualities of a brilliant writer involve possession of the required technical skills and the appropriate communication skills depending on the field of writing (Lutovich and Fisher 51). Works Cited Bartal, Daniel. Shared Beliefs in a Society: Social Psychological. New York: SAGE, 2009. Print. Boucher, Julie. Doubts. Pittsburgh: Xlibris Corporation, 2011. Print. Lutovich, Diane and Fisher, Janis. Professional Writing Skills: A Self-Paced Training Program. California: Write It Well Press, 2009. Print. Starnino, Carmine. Credo. New York: McGill-Queen's Press, 2010. Print. Read More