Technology gadgets remain as one of the most intriguing topics that pull people's interest. Whether it on a new iPhone in the Market or a wireless charger for use in electric cars, people find technology news to be exciting and informative. …
Download file to see previous pages...
Today, there are many technology blogs in operations, with each one of them trying to meet the needs of its audience. Gizmodo.com and engadget.com are some of the technology blogs that people use to learn of any valuable technological news for their consumptions. After a close evaluation of the two websites, it is evident that both of them show some similarity, as well some differences in terms of quality of design, information, and ease of navigation.
Quality of design is an important parameter that evaluators can use to compare two or more websites. When one looks at the two websites, gizmodo.com seems to lack a consistent theme. However, engadget.com has a consistent them in all its pages. The two websites also excels in their usage of pictures. Rather than provide picture that distract the attention of readers, gizmodo.com and engadget.com have photos that blend in with the associated stories. Looking at the two websites, it is clear to notice that engadget.com has a collection of pictures with caption forming the top focal point of the website. This is what must people look at and choose what story they would like to read. On the other hand, the focal point of gizmodo.com is one picture that carries a picture of an article among the top stories of the day. This article keeps cycling to allow other article to be seen by readers. With pictures, the two website have sufficient contrast between text and background making them visible to readers. The designers of the websites put the eligibility of all captions into focus when designing the websites. The two websites also stand out on their use of text. With many items having significant length of articles, both websites have their articles segmented paragraphs that users can read with ease. Most important, both websites have their heading places at appropriate positions making their pages consistent with one another. Apart from quality of information, both sites provide various technology blogs and weblogs targeted to technology enthusiasts. After inspecting the websites, one can to identify with the audience based on the content provided. Both sites provide technology related content. Moreover, both gizmodo.com and endgadget.com aim at delivering new and technology related information to its users. With technology being a dynamic and exciting field full of innovation, the websites reason for existence is to disseminate this information to users with various interests in technology items. Being that the website's purposes it to disseminate technology news and other latest technology; both websites seemed to be well updated. For instance, both websites carried different stories posted at the same date this review was written. Nonetheless, engadget.com seems to have more information that gizmodo.com. This is because engadget.com has improved weblogs, as well as podcast. These features are not available in gizmodo.com despite its resourcefulness in technology news. After reading the websites, my interest is to experience actual use of these technologies. Surprisingly, none of the two had any errors. Instead, most of all the articles read through displayed a high sense of clarity and grammatical correctness. These attributes are desire of any blog or web blog in order to boost readily and at the same time increase the credibility of the website as a reliable source of information about latest technological development. A well-designed website provides users with easy navigation as they explore the websites in question. Comparing the two websites, both websites provide users
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Website evaluation- gizmodo.com vs. engadget.com Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1439803-websites-evaluation
(Website Evaluation- gizmodo.com Vs. engadget.Com Essay)
“Website Evaluation- gizmodo.com Vs. engadget.Com Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1439803-websites-evaluation.
The presented narrative structure would thoroughly review the content and web links and thereby state one’s personal opinion regarding whether or not this web site offers meaningful information for viewers, including students of criminal law and procedure.
Evaluation of a Website With the exponential growth of the internet over the last decades, websites are a part of daily lives all over the world. Websites serve as sources of information, commerce, entertainment and dissemination of opinion. In the extremely competitive World Wide Web, a website has to be skillfully designed to draw visitors.
They propose access to information and databases from all over the world.
The web site selected for analysis is "SIL", and the web page is "Endangered Languages". The article is written by Ph. D. Michael Cahill. The author does not include his personal e-mail address but there is reference information about the author and his current position.
The site is designed to raise awareness amongst individuals of the society about volunteerism. It gives them a guide how they can help the individuals who are in need and have suffered because of the calamities. The help generated through this can be in terms of money or manpower.
Unless a website meets the need of the intended users, it will not meet the needs of the organization providing the website. An efficient website should be user centric and needs to continuously improvise based on the evolving user requirements. The website should not only meet the needs of the intended end users, but also should meet certain requirements of being a good and friendly user interface.
The consequences include the wastage that can take place as well as the time constraints which are there when collecting primary sources.
A secondary source would list down research obtained from books, magazines, newspapers,
This method has been well discussed and recommended by educational researchers’ namely (Jonasse 2010) and (Boettcher 2014) to experience better learning through rhetoric. For the purpose of this paper, the website under
The author of the paper touches upon the content of the website "http://www.dhmo.org". The author also provides the idea of Jonassen, D., Kim, B., namely, “Meaningful learning requires deep engagement with ideas” and it is vital that one makes an assessment of the authenticity and quality of the material before doing so.
s professionals by providing long term experience that allow each individual to represent his or her State to the worldwide environment (Saint Joseph, 2014). The US Department of Student Internship Program provides students with career opportunities in overseas environments. The
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Website evaluation- gizmodo.com vs. engadget.com for FREE!